Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Placebo Interventions for Nausea: a Systematic Review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Expectancy often predicts nausea, but the extent to which placebo interventions can alter nausea is less clear.

Purpose

We conducted a systematic review to determine 1) if placebo interventions can affect nausea and 2) which features of these interventions are effective.

Methods

Articles were identified via PsychInfo, Medline, and PubMed databases. We targeted instructional and conditioning interventions aimed at altering nausea via the placebo effect.

Results

Fourteen studies were identified, nine instructional and five conditioning. Many found evidence suggesting that placebo interventions could alter nausea, but a few found no evidence or ‘reverse’ effects. Effective interventions tended to be those that were aimed at participants with high initial expectancies, with evidence that combined or conditioning manipulations were more effective than instructions.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that placebo interventions can alter nausea and that these may serve as a useful way of reducing the burden of nausea in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muth ER, Stern RM, Thayer JF, Kock KL. Assessment of the multiple dimensions of nausea: The nausea profile. J Psychosom Res. 1996; 40: 511-520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy- induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2482-2494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Hansen M, Herrstedt J. Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 4472-4478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillarius DL, Kloeg PH, van der Wall E, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in daily clinical practice: A community hospital-based study. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20: 107-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson Q, Teleni L, Muller J, et al. Malnutrition and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Implications for practice. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012; 39: 340-345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zachariae R, Paulsen K, Mehlsen M, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, and fatigue—the role of individual differences related to sensory perception and autonomic reactivity. Psychother Psychosom. 2007; 76: 376-384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Erblich J, Diefenbach MA, Bovbjerg DH. Pre-surgery psychological factors predict pain, nausea and fatigue one week following breast cancer surgery. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010; 39: 1043-1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanger GJ, Andrews PLR. Treatment of nausea and vomiting: Gaps in our knowledge. Auton Neurosci. 2006; 129: 3-16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient-clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 2012; 307: 567-568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart-Williams S, Podd J. The placebo effect: Dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate. Psychol Bull. 2004; 130: 324-340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Benedetti F, Pollo A, Lopiano L, et al. Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responsese. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 4315-4323.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Price DD, Milling LS, Kirsch I, et al. An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain. 1999; 83: 147-156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Price DD, Finniss D, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: Recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 59: 565-590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirsch I. Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Appl Prev Psychol. 1997; 6: 69-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bovbjerg DH, Redd WH, Jacobsen PB, et al. An experimental analysis of classically conditioned nausea during cancer chemotherapy. Psychosom Med. 1992; 54: 623-637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peck C, Coleman G. Implications for placebo theory for clinical research and practice in pain management. Theor Med. 1991; 12: 247-270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Voudouris NJ, Peck CL, Coleman G. The role of conditioning and verbal expectancy in the placebo response. Pain. 1990; 43: 121-128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirsch I. Conditioning, expectancy, and the placebo effect: Comment on Stewart-Williams and Podd (2004). Psychol Bull. 2004; 130: 341-343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Colloca L, Siguado M, Benedetti F. The role of learning in nocebo and placebo effects. Pain. 2008; 126: 211-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Colloca L, Benedetti F. Placebo analgesia induced by social observational learning. Pain. 2009; 144: 28-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horing B, Weimer K, Schrade D, et al. Reduction of motion sickness with an enhanced placebo instruction: An experimental study with healthy participants. Psychosom Med. 2013; 75: 497-504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klosterhalfen S, Kellermann S, Braun S, et al. Gender and the nocebo response following conditioning and expectancy. J Psychosom Res. 2009; 66: 323-328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roscoe JA, Hickok JT, Morrow GR. Patient expectations as predictor of chemotherapy-induced nausea. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 121-126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH. Specific response expectancies predict anticipatory nausea during chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001; 69: 831-835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Colagiuri B, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, et al. How do patient expectancies, quality of life and postchemotherapy nausea interrelate? Am Cancer Soc. 2008; 113: 654-661.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colagiuri B, Zachariae R. Patient expectancy and post-chemotherapy nausea: A meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2010; 40: 3-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrstedt J, Muss HB, Warr DG, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis over multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer. 2005; 104: 1548-1555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver I. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer. 2011; 19: 1533-1538.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller FG, Colloca L. The legitmacy of placebo treatments in clinical practice: Evidence and ethics. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9: 39-47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roscoe JA, O'Neill M, Jean-Pierre P, et al. An exploratory study on the effects of an expectancy manipulation on chemotherapy-related nausea. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010; 40: 379-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stockhorst U, Wiener JA, Klosterhalfen S, et al. Effects of overshadowing on conditioned nausea in cancer patients: An experimental study. Physiol Behav. 1998; 64: 743-753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Burish TG, Carey MP, Krozely MG, Greco AF. Conditioned side effects induced by cancer chemotherapy: Prevention through behavioral treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987; 55: 42-48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Redd WH, Montgomery GH, DuHamel KN. Behavioral intervention for cancer treatment side effects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 810-823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Eberhart LHJ, Doring HJ, Holzrichter P, Roscher R, Seeling W. Therapeutic suggestions given during neurolept-anaesthesia decrease post-operative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998; 15: 446-452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Silverstein JH, et al. Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: Response expectancies and emotional distress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010; 78: 80-88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Disbrow EA, Bennett HL, Owings JT. Effect of preoperative suggestion on postoperative gastrointestinal motility. West J Med. 1993; 158: 488-492.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meissner K. Effects of placebo interventions on gastric motility and general autonomic activity. J Psychosom Res. 2009; 66: 391-398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sternbach RA. The effects of instructional sets on autonomic responsivity. Psychophysiology. 1964; 1: 67-72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gay LN, Carliner PE. The prevention and treatment of motion sickness; seasicknes. Bull John Hopkins Hosp. 1949; 84: 470-490.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mattes RD. Prevention of food aversions in cancer patients during treatment. Nutr Cancer. 1994; 21: 13-24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Okifuji A, Friedman AG. Experimentally induced taste aversions in humans: Effects of overshadowing on acquisition. Behav Res Ther. 1992; 30: 23-32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartz MD, Jacobsen PB, Bovbjerg DH. Role of nausea in the development of aversions to a beverage paired with chemotherapy treatment in cancer patients. Physiol Behav. 1996; 59: 659-663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu S, Willoughby LM, Lagomarson JJ, Jaeger HA. Optokinetic rotation-induced taste aversions correlate with overall symptoms of motion sickness in humans. Percept Mot Skills. 1996; 82: 859-864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lamon S, Wilson GT, Leaf RC. Human classical aversion conditioning: Nausea versus electric shock in the reduction of target beverage consumption. Behav Res Ther. 1977; 15: 313-320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stockhorst U, Steingruber H, Enck P, Klosterhalfen S. Pavlovian conditioning of nausea and vomiting. Auton Neurosci. 2006; 129: 50-57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ozdemir E, Akgedik K, Akdogan S, Kansu E. The lollipop with strawberry aroma may be promising in reduction of infusion-related nausea and vomiting during the infusion of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells. Am Soc Blood and Marrow Transplant. 2008; 14: 1425-1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tyler DB. The influence of a placebo, body position and medication on motion sickness. Am J Physiol. 1946; 146: 458-466.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Eden D, Zuk Y. Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. J Appl Psychol. 1995; 80: 628-647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Williamson MJ, Thomas MJ, Stern RM. The contribution of expectations to motion sickness symptoms and gastric activity. J Psychosom Res. 2004; 56: 721-726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Levine ME, Stern RM, Koch KL. The effects of manipulating expectations through placebo and nocebo administration on gastic tachyarrhythmia and motion-induced nausea. Psychosom Med. 2006; 68: 478-486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shelke AR, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, et al. Effect of a nausea expectancy manipulation on chemotherapy-induced nausea: A university of Rochester Cancer Centre community clinical oncology program study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2008; 35: 381-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Weimer K, Schulte J, Maichle A, et al. Effects of ginger and expectations of symptoms of nausea in a balanced placebo design. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 1-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Klosterhalfen S, Ruttgers A, Krumrey E, et al. Pavlovian conditioning of taste aversion using a motion sickness paradigm. Psychosom Med. 2000; 62: 671-677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Klosterhalfen S, Kellermann S, Stockhorst U, et al. Latent inhibition of rotation chair-induced nausea in healthy male and female volunteers. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67: 335-340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stockhorst U, Hall G, Enck P, Klosterhalfen S. Effects of overshadowing on conditioned and unconditioned nausea in a rotation paradigm with humans. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(8): 2651-2664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Barnett LJ, Eaker EY. Electrogastrography: A document prepared by the gastric section of the American Motility Society clinical GI motility testing task force. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003; 15: 89-102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Durlach PJ, Rescorla RA. Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within-compound associations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980; 6: 175-187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lubow RE. Latent inhibition. Psychol Bull. 1973; 79: 398-407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jensen MP, Karoly P. Motivation and expectancy factors in symptom perception: A laboratory study of the placebo effect. Psychosom Med. 1991; 53: 144-152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Colloca L, Benedetti F. How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia. Pain. 2006; 124: 126-133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bennett CH, Tremain M, Mackintosh NJ. Facilitation and retardation of flavor conditioning following prior exposure to the CS. Q J Exp Psychol. 1996; 49: 220-230.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ferguson CJ, Heene M. A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012; 7: 555-561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Colagiuri B, Lovibond P. Psychological processes that can bias responses to placebo treatment for pain. In: Colloca L, Flaten M, Meissner K, eds. Placebo and pain: From bench to bedside. London: Academic Press; 2013: 175-182.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Yates BJ, Miller AD, Lucot JB. Physiological basis and pharmacology of motion sickness: An update. Brain Res Bull. 1998; 47: 395-406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof Phyllis Butow for her assistance with the concept and design of the review, and Prof Robert Boakes for his appraisal of an earlier draft.

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Authors Quinn and Colagiuri declare that they have no conflict of interest. Author Quinn was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award in writing this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Sydney, Australia

    Veronica F Quinn B.A. Psych. & Ben Colagiuri Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Veronica F Quinn B.A. Psych.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben Colagiuri Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica F Quinn B.A. Psych..

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinn, V.F., Colagiuri, B. Placebo Interventions for Nausea: a Systematic Review. ann. behav. med. 49, 449–462 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9670-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9670-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation