Direct and Buffering Effects of Social Support Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There are few studies of QoL among long-term gynecologic cancer survivors; available data suggest significant sequelae of disease and treatment. Research clarifying circumstances that improve difficult survivorship trajectories is lacking.
The present study examines whether social support moderates the relationship between physical functioning and psychological outcomes by testing the stress-buffering hypothesis.
Participants (N = 260) were gynecologic cancer survivors (cervical, n = 47; endometrial, n = 133; ovarian, n = 69; vulvar, n = 11). Compromised physical health was conceptualized as multidimensional. Social support (SNI, PSS-Fa, PSS-Fr, ISEL) was tested as a buffer of adverse psychological outcomes (IES-R, CES-D).
Results for traumatic stress provided evidence for buffering; whereas social support was of general benefit for depressive symptoms. Effects varied by source and type of support.
These results suggest that circumstances for gynecologic cancer survivors burdened with physical symptoms may be worse for those with fewer support resources, providing needed insight into a common target of psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors.
- Direct and Buffering Effects of Social Support Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 39, Issue 1 , pp 79-90
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Gynecologic cancer
- Cancer survivorship
- Social support
- Traumatic stress
- Depressive symptoms
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, 159 Psychology Building, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- 3. Gynecologic Disease Center and U.S. Military Cancer Institute, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA