A Randomized Trial of Generic Versus Tailored Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Intermediate Risk Siblings
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Individuals with a sibling who has had colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 61 are at increased risk for colorectal cancer and may derive particular benefit from screening. Tailored interventions may increase participation in appropriate colorectal cancer screening.
This study evaluated the efficacy of two tailored interventions and a generic print intervention.
Participant siblings (N = 412) who were not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening were randomly assigned to receive either a generic print pamphlet, a tailored print pamphlet, or a tailored print pamphlet and tailored counseling call. Colorectal cancer screening 6 months after the baseline interview was the outcome measure.
Results indicated that colorectal cancer screening adherence increased among intermediate risk siblings enrolled in all three intervention groups. Participants in both tailored intervention groups reported having colorectal cancer screening at significantly higher rates than participants in the generic print group. The increase in colorectal cancer screening in the tailored print and counseling call group was not significantly higher than that achieved by the tailored print alone. Decisional balance partially mediated treatment effects. Tailored behavioral interventions are effective methods for increasing screening adherence but telephone counseling did not add significantly to treatment effects.
- American Cancer Society, Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, Georgia: 2008.
- Lynch HT, Lynch PM, Albana WA. Hereditary cancer: Ascertainment and management. CA. 1979; 29: 216–232. CrossRef
- St. John DJB, McDermott FT, Hopper LJ. Cancer risk in relatives of patients with common colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 118: 785–790.
- Rozen P, Fireman Z, Figer A, Legum C. Family history of colorectal cancer as a marker of potential malignancy within a screening program. Cancer. 1987; 60: 248–524. CrossRef
- Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Colditz G, Hunter DJ. A prospective study of family history and risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 1669–1674. CrossRef
- Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(10): 2992–3003. CrossRef
- Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1365–1371. CrossRef
- Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CPJ, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 653–702.
- Levin B, Lieberman A, McFarland B, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal Cancer and the American College of Radiology. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 130–160. CrossRef
- Thrasher J, Cummings M, Michalek A, Mahoney MK, Pillittere D. Colorectal cancer screening among individuals with and without a family history. J Public Health Manag Prac. 2002; 8: 1–9.
- Ruthotto F, Papendorf F, Wegener G, et al. Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18: 1518–1522. CrossRef
- Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol. 2002; 21(1): 3–15. CrossRef
- Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Goel V. Reasons given by relatives of colorectal cancer patients for not undergoing screening. Prev Med. 2004; 39: 643–648. CrossRef
- Caffarey SM, Broughton CIM, Marks CG. Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia in a targeted high-risk population. Br J Surg. 1993; 80: 1399–1400. CrossRef
- Glanz K, Steffen AD, Taglialatela LA. Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(7): 1485–1491. CrossRef
- Rawl S, Champion V, Scott L, et al. A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71(2) :215–227. CrossRef
- Kreuter M, Wray R. Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Promo. 2003; Supp 3: S227–32.
- Noar S, Benac C, Harris M. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored bring health behavior change. Psychol Bull. 2007; 133: 673–693. CrossRef
- Myers R, Sifri R, Hyslop T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2083–2091. CrossRef
- Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984; 84: 104–106.
- Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. In: Becker MH, ed. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack; 1974: 27–59.
- Champion V, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008: 45–65.
- Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother: Theory, Res Prac. 1982; 20: 161–173. CrossRef
- Prochaska JO, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008: 97–121.
- Leventhal H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Adv Exp Social Psychol. 1970; 5: 119–186. CrossRef
- Leventhal H, Brissette I, Leventhal EA. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, eds. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003: 42–65.
- Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994; 13: 122–129. CrossRef
- Rauscher G, Earp J, O’Malley M. Relation between intervention exposures, changes in attitudes and mammography use in the North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 741–747.
- Center for Disease Control. Colorectal Cancer Screening Saves Lives. CDC Pamphlet, 2002; available at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/sfl/print_materials. Accessability verified October 22, 2008.
- Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York: Guildord Press; 2002.
- Townsend A, Franks M. Binding ties: Closeness and conflict in adult children’s caregiving relationships. Psychol Aging. 1995; 10: 343–351. CrossRef
- Lipkus I, Rimer B, Halabi S, Strigo T. Can tailored interventions increase mammography us among HMO women. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18(1): 1–10. CrossRef
- Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, de Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 236–242. CrossRef
- Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological and research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 1173–1182. CrossRef
- Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology. Vol. 1. In: Gilbert D, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York; 2003.
- Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data A: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford; 2003.
- Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1993; 12: 399–405. CrossRef
- Pinto BM, Lynn H, Marcus BH, DePue J, Goldstein MG. Physical-based activity counseling: Intervention effects on mediators of motivational readiness for physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(23): 2–10. CrossRef
- Hay J, Oliveria S, Dusza S, et al. Psychosocial mediators of a nurse intervention to increase skin self-examination in patients at high risk for melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1212–1216. CrossRef
- Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158(6): 848–856. CrossRef
- Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization and applicability of research: Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006; 29 s:126–153. CrossRef
- A Randomized Trial of Generic Versus Tailored Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Intermediate Risk Siblings
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 2 , pp 207-217
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Colorectal cancer screening
- Tailored interventions
- Intermediate risk siblings
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 2. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- 3. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 4. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- 5. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- 6. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- 7. Northeast Regional Cancer Institute, Scranton, PA, USA
- 8. Colorectal Surgical Associates of New Jersey, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA
- 9. City University of New York, New York, NY, USA