Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background and Purpose
Although evidence suggests that survivors and spousal caregivers tend to experience somewhat similar levels of distress and that the survivor’s distress affects his/her own quality of life, the degree to which each person’s distress has an independent effect on their partner’s quality of life is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to examine the dyadic effects of psychological distress on the quality of life of couples dealing with cancer.
A total of 168 married survivor–caregiver dyads participating in the American Cancer Society’s Study of Cancer Survivors-I and Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers provided complete data for study variables. Participating survivors were diagnosed with either breast or prostate cancer approximately 2 years prior to participating in the study.
Using the Actor Partner Interdependence Model, results revealed that although each person’s psychological distress is the strongest predictor of their own quality of life, partner’s distress and (dis)similarity in distress of the couple also play significant roles in one’s quality of life. In addition, the adverse effect of having a partner who is less emotionally resourceful was especially pronounced on men’s physical health.
Our systematic investigation provided valuable evidence for identifying the subgroup of cancer survivors and their spouses who are vulnerable to poor quality of life due to their mutual psychological distress. These findings suggest that couples may benefit from interventions that enhance their ability to manage psychological distress, particularly the wife’s, which may improve the mental and physical health of both partners when they are dealing with cancer.
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007.
- Hughes SL, Giobbie-Hurder A, Weaver FM, et al. Relationship between caregiver burden and health-related quality of life. Gerontologist. 1999; 39: 534–545.
- Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 738–746.
- Baider L, Cooper C, De-Nour AK. Cancer and the Family. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.
- Hodges LJ, Humphris GM, Macfarlane G. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 1–12. CrossRef
- Nordin K, Berglund G, Glimelius B, et al. Predicting anxiety and depression among cancer patients: a clinical model. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 376–384. CrossRef
- Roth A, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, et al. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998; 82: 1904–1908. CrossRef
- Vanderwerker LC, Laff RE, Kadan-Lottick NS, et al. Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use among caregivers of advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 6899–6907. CrossRef
- Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 1517–1524. CrossRef
- Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, et al. Couples’ adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis 18. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 37–48. CrossRef
- Manne SL. Cancer in the marital context: a review of the literature. Cancer Investig. 1998; 16: 188–202. CrossRef
- Manne SL. Coping and social support. In: Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Geller PA, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Health Psychology, vol. 9. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2003: 51–74.
- Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Felgoise SH, et al. Project Genesis: assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 1036–1048. CrossRef
- Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, et al. Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer. 1999; 86: 577–588. CrossRef
- Kim Y, Schulz R, Carver CS. Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience. Psychosom Med. 2007; 69: 283–291. CrossRef
- Holland JC, Reznick I. Pathways for psychosocial care of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2005; 104: 2624–2637. CrossRef
- Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006.
- Given BA, Given CW, Kozachik S. Family support in advanced cancer. Ca. 2001; 51: 213–231. CrossRef
- Kim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strains: Comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. Journal of Aging and Health. 2007 (in press).
- Hagedoorn M, Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, et al. Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 274–282. CrossRef
- Brown SL, Nesse RM, Vinokur AD, et al. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14: 320–327. CrossRef
- Manne SL, Ostroff J, Sherman M, et al. Buffering effects of family and friend support on associations between partner unsupportive behaviors and coping among women with breast cancer. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2003; 20: 771–792. CrossRef
- Gilbar O. Gender as a predictor of burden and psychological distress of elderly husbands and wives of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncol. 1999; 8: 287–294. CrossRef
- Given B, Wyatt G, Given C, et al. Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004; 31: 1105–1117. CrossRef
- Hagedoorn M, Buunk BP, Kuijer RG, et al. Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psycho-Oncol. 2000; 9: 232–242. CrossRef
- Foxall MJ, Gaston-Johansson F. Burden and health outcomes of family caregivers of hospitalized bone marrow transplant patients. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24: 915–923. CrossRef
- Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G, et al. Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychosom Res. 2003; 55: 453–460. CrossRef
- Smith T, Stein KD, Mehta CC, et al. The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer. 2007; 109: 1–12. CrossRef
- Shacham S. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. J Pers Assess. 1983; 47: 305–306. CrossRef
- Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
- Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. Amos Users’ Guide, Version 6.0. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation; 2005.
- Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993: 111–135.
- Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL VI User's Guide. (3rd). Mooresville, IL: Scientific Software; 1984.
- Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1–55. CrossRef
- Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, et al. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psycho-Oncol. 2002; 11: 273–281. CrossRef
- McNair DM, Neuchert JWP. Profile of Mood States: Technical Updates. Multi-Health Systems, Inc., 2005.
- Coyne JC, Smith DA. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61: 404–412. CrossRef
- Hooker K, Manoogian-O'Dell M, Monahan DJ, et al. Does type of disease matter? Gender differences among Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease spouse caregivers. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 568–573.
- Miller B, Cafasso L. Gender differences in caregiving: fact or artifact. Gerontologist. 1992; 32: 498–507.
- Yee JL, Schulz R. Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity among family caregivers: a review and analysis. Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 147–164.
- Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton T, Cacioppo JT, et al. Marital conflict and endocrine function: are men really more physiologically affected than women? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996; 64: 324–332. CrossRef
- Baider L, Koch U, Esacson R, et al. Prospective study of cancer patients and their spouses: the weakness of marital strength. Psycho-Oncol. 1998; 7: 49–56. CrossRef
- Burman B, Margolin G. Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: an interactional perspective. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 39–63. CrossRef
- Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001; 127: 472–503. CrossRef
- Shumaker SA, Hill DR. Gender differences in social support and physical health. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 102–111. CrossRef
- Andrykowski MA, Manne SL. Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? I. Standards and levels of evidence. Annals Behav Med. 2006; 32: 93–97. CrossRef
- Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74: 1143–1152. CrossRef
- Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 35, Issue 2 , pp 230-238
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Psychological distress
- Quality of life
- Dyadic adjustment
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, 250 Williams St. NW., Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
- 2. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- 3. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA