Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding demand volatility in supply chains through the vibrations analogy—the onion supply case

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

Fluctuating demand for goods in many situations is not caused by genuine discontinuities in the consumption or usage of those goods. Basic food products, for example, are consumed at relatively stable rates. But disruptions in their supply—real or imputed—may cause demand volatility with consequences of unwanted price fluctuations. In this paper, the vibrations analogy is proposed to better understand this phenomenon. Various alternative scenarios of damping vibrations are discussed in this paper, viz., underdamped, overdamped, and critically damped system. An interpretation of those scenarios is offered with respect to their meaning to supply chain management and illustrated through the case of the onion supply. The proposed analogy is found to be useful in explaining and taking appropriate steps for improvement in such cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arshinder K, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG (2008) Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 115:316–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackstone Jr. JH, Jonah J (2008) APICS dictionary, 12th edn, 134

  3. Chen IJ, Paulraj A (2004) Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. J Oper Manag 22(2):119–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall, pp 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  5. Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information. Manag Sci 52(3):323–336

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR, Towill DR (2003) Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: a control theoretic approach. Eur J Oper Res 147:567–590

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. De Treville S, Shapiro RH, Hameri AP (2004) From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance. J Oper Manag 21:613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Disney SM, Towill DR (2003) Vendor-managed inventory and bullwhip reduction in a two-level supply chain. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(6):625–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kachani S, Perakis G (2006) Fluid dynamics models and their applications in transportation and pricing. Eur J Oper Res 170:496–517

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly SG (2000) Fundamentals of Mechanical Vibrations, 2nd edn. Singapore, Mc Graw Hill

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim I, Springer M (2008) Measuring endogenous supply chain volatility: beyond the bullwhip effect. Eur J Oper Res 189:172–193

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai KH, Wong CWY, Cheng TCE (2006) Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. Comput Ind 57(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997a) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Manag Rev, Spring, pp 93–102

  14. Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Manag Sci 43(4):546–558

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee HL, So KC, Tang CS (2000) The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Manag Sci 46(5):626–643

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. National Horticulture Board website www.nhb.gov.in, accessed during Feb–Aug. 2011

  17. Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen K-Y (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Manag Sci 57(6):1111–1137

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. PHD Chamber, Press Release; 30 Dec (2010) Price fluctuations, supply chain management need to be monitored to check food inflation

  19. Prakash D, Shrotriya GC (2007) Enhancing the pungency through “Pink Revolution” -Marketing of onion in India. Rural Development and Management Centre, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rao SS (2000) Mechanical vibrations, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  21. Romano P (2009) How can fluid dynamics help supply chain management? Int J Prod Econ 118:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rong Y, Shen Z-JM, Snyder LV (2008) The impact of ordering behavior on order-quantity variability: a study of forward and reverse bullwhip effects. Flex Serv Manuf J 20:95–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rong A, Akkerman R, Grunow M (2011) An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 131:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarimveis H, Patrinos P, Tarantilis CD, Kiranoudis CT (2008) Dynamic modelling and control of supply chain systems: a review. Comput Oper Res 35:3530–3561

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Saeed KA, Malhotra MK, Grover V (2005) Examining the impact of interorganization systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer–supplier dyads. Decis Sci 36(3):365–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders NR, Premus R (2005) Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration, and performance. J Bus Logist 26(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schleifenbaum H, Uam J-Y, Schuh G, Hinke C (2009) Turbulence in production systems: fluid dynamics and its contributions to production theory. Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science Vol II WCECS 2009, October 20–22, 2009, San Francisco, USA

  28. Sourirajan K, Ramachandran B, AN L (2008) Application of control theoretic principles to manage inventory replenishment in a supply chain. Int J Prod Res 46(21):6163–6188

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma S (2008) On the flexibility of demand and production rate. Eur J Oper Res 190(2):557–561

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma S (2008) Theory of exchange. Eur J Oper Res 186(1):128–136

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma S (2009) A composite model in the context of a production-inventory system. Optim Lett 3(2):239–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma S (2009) Extending Sanjay Sharma’s theory of exchange. Int J Appl Manag Scince 1(4):325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma S (2009) Single/multiple parameter swapping in the context of Sanjay Sharma’s Theory of Exchange. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5-6):629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma S (2009) A method to exchange the demand of products for cost improvement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(3-4):382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma S (2010) Policies concerning decisions related to quality level. Int J Prod Econ 125(1):146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharma S, Dubey D (2010) Multiple sourcing decisions using integrated AHP and knapsack model: a case on carton sourcing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(9-12):1171–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma S (2011) Effects concerning quality level with the increase in production rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5-8):629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma S (2012) Development of supplier relationship including cost of defectives in the cyclic production. Prod Plan Control Manag Oper. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666866

  39. Van Donk DP, Akkerman R, Van der Vaart T (2008) Opportunities and realities of supply chain integration: the case of food manufacturers. Br Food J 110(2):218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vonderembse MA, Uppal M, Huang SH, Dismukes JP (2006) Designing supply chains: towards theory development. Int J Prod Econ 100:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang J, Wong CWY, Lai KH, Ntoko AN (2009) The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer–supplier relationship improvement. Int J Prod Econ 120:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Vihar Lake, Mumbai, 400087, India

    Sanjay Sharma & Kamaldeep Singh Lote

Authors
  1. Sanjay Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamaldeep Singh Lote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Lote, K.S. Understanding demand volatility in supply chains through the vibrations analogy—the onion supply case. Logist. Res. 6, 3–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0083-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0083-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation