Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Partner-specific adaptations, performance, satisfaction, and loyalty in third-party logistics relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Logistics Research

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of the impact of alternative ways to partner-specific adaptations in third-party logistics provider relationships upon performance, customer satisfaction, and the degree of customer loyalty. It offers a view of related theory and a preliminary analysis of “request for quotation” documents. On this basis, several hypotheses are formulated. A questionnaire survey and structural equation modeling (SEM) are then used to test the hypotheses. The analysis shows that adaptations by logistics service providers exert positive influences on performance and customer loyalty. On the other hand, there is a negative impact of customers’ adaptations on performance because own adaptations are perceived as an effort. Nevertheless, the study provides evidence that the total effect of customers’ adaptations on customer loyalty is positive. The results suggest that third-party logistics providers should adapt systems and procedures to their customers’ specific requirements. Despite the negative impact found of customers’ adaptations upon the level of perceived performance, providers should promote moderate customers’ adaptations in order to increase customer loyalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Africk JM, Calkins CS (1994) Does asset ownership mean better service? Transp Distrib 35(5):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 51(3):71–86

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artz KW (1999) Buyer-supplier performance: the role of asset specificity reciprocal investments and relational exchange. Br J Manag 10:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandyopadhyay S, Martell M (2007) Does attitudinal loyalty influence behavioral loyalty? A theoretical and empirical study. J Retail Consum Serv 14(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bentler PM, Chou CP (1987) Practical issues in structural modeling. Soc Methods Res 16(1):78–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannon JP, Perreault WD (1999) Buyer-seller relationships in business markets. J Mark Res 36:439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 295–336

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chin WW, Newsted PR (1999) Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Statistical strategies for small sample research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 307–342

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daugherty P, Stank T, Ellinger AE (1998) Leveraging logistics/distribution capabilities: the effect of logistics service on market share. J Bus Logist 19(2):35–51

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deepen JM, Goldsby TJ, Knemeyer AM, Wallenburg CM (2008) Beyond expectations: an examination of logistics outsourcing goal achievement and goal exceedance. J Bus Logist 29(2):75–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delfmann W, Albers S, Gehring M (2002) The impact of electronic commerce on logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 32(3):203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diaconis P, Efron B (1983) Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Sci Am 248:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellinger AE, Ketchen DJ Jr, Hult GTM, Elmadag AB, Richey RG Jr (2008) Market orientation, employee development practices, and performance in logistics service provider firms. Ind Mark Manag 37(4):353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel R, Naslund D, Bolumole Y (2005) The “white space” of logistics research: a look at the role of methods usage. J Bus Logist 26(2):185–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gadde LE, Hulthén K (2009) Improving logistics outsourcing through increasing buyer-provider interaction. Ind Mark Manag 38(6):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giménez C, Large RO, Ventura E (2005) SCM research methodologies: employing structural equation modeling. In: Seuring S, Müller M, Reiner G, Kotzab H (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 155–170

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heide JB, John G (1992) Do norms matter in marketing relationships. J Mark 56(2):32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heide JB, Stump R (1995) Performance implications of buyer-supplier relationships in industrial markets: a transaction cost explanation. J Bus Res 32(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hertz S, Alfredsson M (2003) Strategic development of third-party logistics providers. Ind Mark Manag 32(2):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hofer AR, Knemeyer AM, Dresner ME (2009) Antecedents and dimensions of customer partnering behavior in logistics outsourcing relationships. J Bus Logist 30(2):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Homburg C, Giering A (2001) Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty-an empirical analysis. Psychol Mark 18(1):43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Homburg C, Krohmer H, Cannon JP, Kiedaisch I (2002) Customer satisfaction in transnational buyer-supplier relationships. J Int Mark 10(4):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klaus P, Hartmann E, Kille C (2009) Top 100 in European transport and logistics services. Market sizes, market segments and market leaders in the European Logistics Industry. Edition 2009/2010. DVV Media Group, Hamburg

  26. Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR (2004) Evaluating the performance of third-party logistics arrangements: a relationship marketing perspective. J Supply Chain Manag Glob Rev Purch Supply 40(1):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwon I, Whan G, Suh T (2004) Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. J Supply Chain Manag Glob Rev Purch Supply 40(2):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Large R, Kovács Z (2001) The acquisition of third-party logistics services: a survey of german and hungarian practice. Supply Chain Forum Int J 2(1):44–51

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lieb RC, Bentz BA (2005) The North American third-party logistics industry in 2004: the provider CEO perspective. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(8):595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo X, Homburg C (2007) Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. J Mark 71(2):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maloni M, Carter CR (2006) Opportunities for research in third-party logistics. Transp J 45(2):23–38

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marasco A (2008) Third-party logistics: a literature review. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morris MH, Brunyee J, Page M (1998) Relationship marketing in practice. Myths and realities. Ind Mark Manag 27:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mortensen O, Lemoine OW (2008) Integration between manufacturers and third party logistics providers? Int J Oper Prod Manag 28(4):331–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17(4):460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Patterson PG, Johnson LW, Spreng RA (1997) Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for business-to-business professional services. J Acad Mark Sci 25(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Razzaque MA, Chang CS (1998) Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey. Int J Phys Distrib Mater Manag 28(2):89–107

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Hamburg 2005. http://www.smartpls.de

  40. Seiders K, Voss GB, Grewal D, Godfrey AL (2005) Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. J Mark 69(4):26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Selviaridis K, Spring M (2007) Third-party logistics: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Logist Manag 18(1):125–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharland A (1997) Sourcing strategy. The impact of costs on relationship outcomes. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 27(7):395–409

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sink HL, Langley CJ Jr, Gibson BJ (1996) Buyer observations of the US third-party logistics market. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 26(3):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sinkovics RR, Roath A (2004) Strategic orientation, capabilities, and performance in manufacturer-3PL relationships. J Bus Logist 25(2):43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Spens KM, Kovács G (2006) A content analysis of research approaches in logistics research. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36(5):374–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stank TP, Daugherty PJ, Ellinger AE (1996) Information exchange, responsiveness and logistics provider performance. Int J Logist Manag 7(2):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK, Savitskie K (2003) Logistics service performance: estimating the influence on market share. J Bus Logist 24(1):27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin YM, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48:159–205

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. van Hoek RI (2000) The purchasing and control of supplementary third-party logistics services. J Supply Chain Manag Glob Rev Purch Supp 36(4):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22:233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Williamson OE (1984) The economics of governance: framework and implications. J Inst Theor Econ 140:195–223

    Google Scholar 

  52. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism, firms. markets, relational contracting. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Williamson OE (1996) The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  54. Williamson OE (2008) Outsourcing: transaction cost economics and supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 44(2):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wirtz J, Lee CM (2003) An examination of the quality and context-specific applicability of commonly used customer satisfaction measures. J Serv Res 5(4):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty 10: Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Business Logistics, University of Stuttgart, Keplerstr 17, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany

    Rudolf O. Large

Authors
  1. Rudolf O. Large
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf O. Large.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Items used in the questionnaire
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Large, R.O. Partner-specific adaptations, performance, satisfaction, and loyalty in third-party logistics relationships. Logist. Res. 3, 37–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0047-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-011-0047-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation