Abstract
We investigated how the initial age structure of a managed, middle boreal (62°N), Norway spruce-dominated (Picea abies L. Karst.) forest area affects the net climate impact of using forest biomass for energy. The model-based analysis used a gap-type forest ecosystem model linked to a life cycle assessment (LCA) tool. The net climate impact of energy biomass refers to the difference in annual net CO2 exchange between the biosystem using forest biomass (logging residues from final felling) and the fossil (reference) system using coal. In the simulations over the 80-year period, the alternative initial age structures of the forest areas were (i) skewed to the right (dominated by young stands), (ii) normally distributed (dominated by middle-aged stands), (iii) skewed to the left (dominated by mature stands), and (iv) evenly distributed (same share of different age classes). The effects of management on net climate impacts were studied using current recommendations as a baseline with a fixed rotation period of 80 years. In alternative management scenarios, the volume of the growing stock was maintained 20% higher over the rotation compared to the baseline, and/or nitrogen fertilization was used to enhance carbon sequestration. According to the results, the initial age structure of the forest area affected largely the net climate impact of using energy biomass over time. An initially right-skewed age structure produced the highest climate benefits over the 80-year simulation period, in contrast to the left-skewed age structure. Furthermore, management that enhanced carbon sequestration increased the potential of energy biomass to replace coal, reducing CO2 emissions and enhancing climate change mitigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457
Malmsheimer RW, Bowyer JL, Fried JS et al (2011) Managing forests because carbon matters: integrating energy, products, and land management policy. J For 109:S7–S51
Ter-Mikaelian M, McKechnie J, Colombo S, Chen J, MacLean H (2011) The carbon neutrality assumption for forest bioenergy: a case study for northwestern Ontario. Forest Chronicle 87:644–652
Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Pajula T (2013) Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment—a review. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5:475–486
Mitchell SR, Harmon ME, O’Connell KEB (2012) Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 4(6):818–827
McKechnie J, Colombo S, MacLean HL (2014) Forest carbon accounting methods and the consequences of forest bioenergy for national greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ Sci Policy 44:164–173
Routa J, Kellomäki S, Peltola H (2012) Impacts of intensive management and landscape structure on timber and energy wood production and net CO2 emissions from energy wood use of Norway spruce. Bioenergy Res 5:106–123
Garcia-Gonzalo J, Peltola H, Zubizarreta Gerendiain A, Kellomäki S (2007) Impacts of forest landscape structure and management on timber production and carbon stocks in the boreal forest ecosystem under changing climate. For Ecol Manag 241:243–257
Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2011) Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2506–2516
Lundmark T, Bergh J, Hofer P et al (2014) Potential roles of Swedish forestry in the context of climate change mitigation. Forests 5(4):557–578
Kilpeläinen A, Torssonen P, Strandman H, Kellomäki S, Asikainen A, Peltola H (2016) Net climate impacts of forest biomass production and utilization in managed boreal forests. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 8:307–316
Cherubini F, Guest G, Strømman AH (2013) Bioenergy from forestry and changes in atmospheric CO2: reconciling single stand and landscape level approaches. J Environ Manag 129:292–301
Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2012) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 4:761–772
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Samson R (2013) Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:117–128
Routa J, Kellomäki S, Kilpeläinen A, Peltola H, Strandman H (2011a) Effects of forest management on the carbon dioxide emissions of wood energy in integrated production of timber and energy biomass. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 3:483–497
Routa J, Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Asikainen A (2011b) Impacts of thinning and fertilization on timber and energy wood production in Norway spruce and Scots pine: scenario analyses based on ecosystem model simulations. Forestry 84:159–175
Pyörälä P, Peltola H, Strandman H, Kilpeläinen A, Asikainen A, Jylhä K, Kellomäki S (2014) Effects of management on economic profitability of forest biomass production and carbon neutrality of bioenergy use in Norway spruce stands under the changing climate. Bioenergy Research 7:279–294
Repo A, Tuovinen JP, Liski J (2015) Can we produce carbon and climate neutral forest bioenergy? Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 7:253–262
Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2012) Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution. Biogeochemistry 109:203–218
Haus S, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2014) Climate mitigation comparison of woody biomass systems with the inclusion of land-use in the reference fossil system. Biomass Bioenergy 65:136–144
Torssonen P, Kilpeläinen A, Strandman H, Kellomäki S, Jylhä K, Asikainen A, Peltola H (2016) Effects of climate change and management on net climate impacts of production and utilization of energy biomass in Norway spruce with stable age-class distribution. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 8:419–427
Nurmi J (1993) Small-sized trees above ground biomass heating value (Pienikokoisten puiden maanpäällisen biomassan lämpöarvo). Helsinki. Acta Forestalia Fennica 236:30p (in Finnish)
Nurmi J (1997) Heating values of mature trees. Acta Forestalia Fennica 256:28p
Energy Statistics Yearbook (2011). Statistics Finland. Helsinki, Finland.
Ramaswamy W, Boucher O, Haigh J et al (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 349–416
Foster P, Ramaswamy P, Artaxo T, Berntsen R, Betts DW et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 130–234
Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Nuutinen T, Korhonen KT, Strandman H (2008) Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management. Philos Trans R Soc B363:2341–2351
Kilpeläinen A, Alam A, Strandman H, Kellomäki S (2011) Life cycle assessment tool for estimating net CO2 exchange of forest production. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 3:461–471
Kellomäki S, Strandman H, Nuutinen T, Peltola H, Korhonen KT, Väisänen H (2005) Adaptation of forest ecosystems, forest and forestry to climate change. FINADAPT. Working Paper 4. Finnish Environment Institute Mimeographs 334. Helsinki.
Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kukkola M, Kellomäki S, Mälkönen E (1998) Applicability of a forest simulation model for estimating effects of nitrogen deposition on a forest ecosystem: test of the validity of a gap-type model. For Ecol Manag 108:239–250
Alam A, Kellomäki S, Kilpeläinen A, Strandman H (2013) Effects of stump extraction on the carbon sequestration in Norway spruce forest ecosystems under varying thinning regimes with implications for fossil fuel substitution. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 5:445–458
Venäläinen A, Tuomenvirta H, Pirinen P, Drebs A (2005) A basic Finnish climate data set 1961–2000—description and illustrations. Reports of the Finnish Meteorological Institute 5:27p
Aalto J, Pirinen P, Heikkinen J, Venäläinen A (2012) Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: comparing the performance of kriging and generalized additive models. Theor Appl Climatol 112:99–111
Äijälä O, Koistinen A, Sved J, Vanhatalo K, Väisänen P (2014) Recommendations for forest management in Finland. (in Finnish: Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset – METSÄNHOITO), Forestry Development Centre Tapio publications. 264 p. (in Finnish)
Äijälä O, Kuusinen M, Koistinen A (2010) Recommendations for management and harvesting of energy wood. (in Finnish: Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset energiapuun korjuuseen ja kasvatukseen), Forestry Development Centre Tapio publications. 32 p. (in Finnish)
Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Ludeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenergy 8:221–234
Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2011) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 3:107–115
Zetterberg L, Chen D (2014) The time aspect of bioenergy—climate impacts of solid biofuels due to carbon dynamics. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 7:785–796
Ter-Mikaelian M, Colombo S, Chen J (2015) The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions. A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting. J For 113:57–68
Gaudreault C, Miner R (2015) Temporal aspects in evaluating the greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of using residues from forest products manufacturing facilities for energy production. J Ind Ecol 19:994–1007
Mika AM, Keeton WS (2015) Net carbon fluxes at stand and landscape scales from wood bioenergy harvests in the US Northeast. Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 7:438–454
Gustavsson L, Haus S, Ortiz CA, Sathre R, Truong NL (2015) Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy. Appl Energy 138:36–50
Sedjo RA, Tian X (2012) An investigation of the carbon neutrality of wood bioenergy. J Environ Prot 3:989–1000
Sathre R, Gustavsson L, Bergh J (2010) Primary energy and greenhouse gas implications of increasing biomass production through forest fertilization. Biomass Bioenergy 34:572–581
Mälkönen E (1976) Effect of whole-tree harvesting on soil fertility. Silva Fennica 10:157–164
Kuusinen M, Ilvesniemi H (eds) (2008) Energiapuun korjuun ympäristövaikutukset, tutkimusraportti. Tapion ja Metlan julkaisuja, Helsinki, Finland, 74 p. (in Finnish)
Jacobson S, Kukkola M, Mälkönen E, Tveite B (2000) Impact of whole-tree harvesting and compensatory fertilization on growth of coniferous thinning stands. For Ecol Manag 129:41–51
Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kukkola M (1998) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on carbon accumulation in boreal forests: model computations compared with the results of long-term fertilization experiments. Chemosphere 36:1155–1160
Acknowledgements
This work was mainly funded by the METY project (A32172) under the European Regional Development Fund. Its finalization was also supported by the FORBIO project (14970), funded by the Strategic Research Council of Academy of Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilpeläinen, A., Strandman, H., Grönholm, T. et al. Effects of Initial Age Structure of Managed Norway Spruce Forest Area on Net Climate Impact of Using Forest Biomass for Energy. Bioenerg. Res. 10, 499–508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9821-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9821-z