Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cool-Season Grass Biomass in the Southern Mixed-Grass Prairie Region of the USA

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emphasis is trending toward future bioenergy production being derived from cellulosic materials rather than starch from seed crops. The majority of research on perennial biomass production for conversion to ethanol or other biofuel has used warm-season grasses as the feedstock material. Some cool-season grasses also have great potential for biomass production, even in the southern prairie region. A study was conducted for 4 years to evaluate the dry matter production potential of several cool-season grass cultivars in west-central Kansas. Ten cultivars were grown at two locations, one an upland soil and the other a lowland soil, and harvested in late June from 2007 to 2010 when fully headed with mature seed. Three cultivars, one tall [Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Barkw. & D.R. Dewey], intermediate [T. intermedium (Host) Barkw. & D.R. Dewey], and western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love], had the greatest biomass production with 4,525–4,840 kg ha−1 dry matter averaged over four years at an upland location. At a lowland location, three cultivars, either intermediate or tall wheatgrasses, averaged 5,340–5,490 kg ha−1 dry matter over the 4 years. During the particularly moist spring of 2007, three cultivars at the upland location and eight cultivars at the lowland location produced over 9,000 kg ha−1 dry matter. All cultivars increased in plant stand frequency from 2006 to 2011, except for the western wheatgrass and Russian wildrye [Psathyrostachys juncea (Fisch.) Nevski] cultivars that already had a high frequency before the first biomass harvest. These grasses may add versatility to production systems by not only serving as complementary forage for grazing or hay, but also by providing an alternative feedstock for cellulosic ethanol and combustion energy production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boe A, Lee DK (2007) Genetic variation for biomass production in prairie cordgrass and switchgrass. Crop Sci 47:929–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Casler MD (2005) Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the Northern USA. Crop Sci 45:388–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Casler MD, Cherney JH, Brummer EC (2009) Biomass yield of naturalized populations and cultivars of reed canary grass. BioEnergy Res 2:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassida KA, Muir JP, Hussey MA (2005) Biofuel component concentrations and yields of switchgrass in South Central U.S. environments. Crop Sci 45:682–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank AB, Ray IM, Berdahl JD (1997) Carbon isotope discrimination, ash, and canopy temperature in three wheatgrass species. Crop Sci 37:1573–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillen RL, Berg WA (2005) Response of perennial cool-season grasses to clipping in the southern plains. Agron J 97:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses. USDA Agr Handbook 379. USDA, Washington, D.C, pp. 387–598

  8. Great Plains Agricultural Council (1966) A stand establishment survey of grass plantings in the Great Plains. Nebraska Agric Exp Stn, Great Plains Council Report 23

  9. Harmoney KR (2005) Growth responses of perennial cool-season grasses grazed intermittently. Forage Grazinglands. doi:10.1094/FG-2005-0105-01-RS

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harmoney KR (2007) Persistence of heavily-grazed cool-season grasses in the central great plains. Forage Grazinglands. doi:10.1094/FG-2007-0625-01-RS

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harmoney KR, Thompson CA (2010) Using long-term relative yield and quality to select adapted small grain forages. Forage Grazinglands. doi:10.1094/FG-2010-0125-01-RS

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann H, Maier L, Bohm T (1999) Quality of solid biofuels—database and field trials. In: R.P. Overend and E. Chornet (eds) Proc. Biomass Conf. of the Americas, 4th, Oakland, CA. 29 Aug.–2 Sept. 1999. Vol 1 Elsevier Sci, Oakland, CA. pp 273–279

  13. Hendrickson JR, Berdahl JD, Liebig MA, Karn JF (2005) Tiller persistence of eight intermediate wheatgrass entries grazed at three morphological stages. Agron J 97:1390–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkins AA (2005) Grazing tolerance of cool-season grasses planted as seeded sward plots and spaced plants. Crop Sci 45:1559–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karn JF, Berdahl JD, Frank AB (2006) Nutritive quality of four perennial grasses as affected by species, cultivar, maturity, and plant tissue. Agron J 98:1400–1409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Launchbaugh JL (1971) Upland seeded pastures compared for grazing steers at Hays, Kansas. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, KS. Bulletin 548

  17. Lee D, Aberle E, Chen C, Egenolf J, Harmoney K, Kakani G et al (2013) Nitrogen and harvest management of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grassland for sustainable biomass feedstock production. GCB Bioenergy 5:6–15. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Jørgensen U et al (2003) Environment and harvest time affects the combustion qualities of miscanthus genotypes. Agron J 95:1274–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malinowski DP, Hopkins AA, Pinchak WE, Sij JW, Ansley RJ (2003) Productivity and survival of defoliated wheatgrasses in the Rolling Plains of Texas. Agron J 95:614–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammed YA, Chen C, Lee DK (2013) Harvest time and nitrogen fertilization to improve bioenergy feedstock yield and quality. Agron J 106:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Monono EM, Nyren PE, Berti MT, Pryor SW (2013) Variability in biomass yield, chemical composition, and ethanol potential of individual and mixed herbaceous biomass species grown in North Dakota. Ind Crop Prod 41:331–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulkey VR, Owens VN, Lee DK (2006) Management of switchgrass-dominated conservation reserve program lands for biomass production in South Dakota. Crop Sci 46:712–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanderson MA, Adler PR (2008) Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int J Mol Sci 9:768–788. doi:10.3390/ijms9050768

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. SAS Institute, Inc (1996) SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC

  25. Tahir M, Casler MD, Moore KJ, Brummer E (2010) Biomass yield and quality of reed canarygrass under five harvest management systems for bioenergy production. BioEnergy Res 4:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. USDA (2013) Crop production: acreage. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C., p 41

    Google Scholar 

  27. USDA (2014) PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov

  28. Vogel KP, Masters RA (2001) Frequency grid - a simple tool for measuring grassland establishment. J Range Manag 54:653–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vogel KP, Pedersen JF, Masterson SD, Toy JJ (1999) Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Sci 39:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waller SS, Moser LE, Anderson B (1986) A guide for planning and analyzing a year- round forage program. Nebraska Cooperative Extension Bulletin EC 86-113-C. University of Nebraska, Lincoln

  31. Yau SK, Hamblin J (1994) Relative yield as a measure of entry performance in variable environments. Crop Sci 34:813–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. R. Harmoney.

Additional information

Contribution no. 14-073-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harmoney, K.R. Cool-Season Grass Biomass in the Southern Mixed-Grass Prairie Region of the USA. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 203–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9514-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9514-9

Keywords

Navigation