Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compositional and Thermal Evaluation of Lignocellulosic and Poultry Litter Chars via High and Low Temperature Pyrolysis

High and Low Temperature Pyrolyzed Biochars

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inorganic elements in biomass feedstocks can influence thermochemical reactions as well as the resultant char’s elemental, compositional, and thermal characteristics. Chars were produced using slow pyrolysis under low (≤400°C) and high (≥500°C) temperature regimes from sugarcane bagasse, peanut hulls, pecan shell, pine chips, poultry litter, and switchgrass. The chars and raw feedstocks were characterized for their elemental, structural, and thermal properties to ascertain the implications of feedstock selection and pyrolysis temperatures on these properties. Char mass yields from the six feedstocks ranged between 28% and 78% by weight while carbon yields ranged between 44% and 89%. In both instances, lower yields were obtained with increasing pyrolysis temperature. Higher pyrolysis temperatures (≥500°C) resulted in more neutral to alkaline chars possessing greater ash contents and increased aromatic character with narrow O/C and H/C ratios. A significant exponential curve response (r 2 = 0.87, P < 0.001) was revealed between char mass yields vs. pyrolysis temperature. All raw feedstocks and chars contained mixed amounts of macro-, micro-, and trace element concentrations. The higher heating values (HHV) tended to increase with heightened pyrolysis temperature with some chars producing >30 MJ kg−1. The chars’ HHV values inversely correlated to their total ash and Cl content. Lignocelluloses chars had better thermal characteristics and lower ash quality concerns implying suitable service in thermal energy production. In contrast, poultry litter char had greater ash contents, medium HHV values, and contained corrosive inorganic elements, which rendered it problematic as a feedstock for thermal energy generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BG:

Bagasse

DTA:

Differential thermal analysis

FC:

Fixed carbon

HHV:

Higher heating value

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

PC:

Pine chip

PH:

Peanut hull

PL:

Poultry litter

PS:

Pecan shell

SW:

Switchgrass

TGA:

Thermal gravimetric analyzer

TG:

Thermogravimetry

VM:

Volatile matter

References

  1. Demirbas A, Arin G (2002) An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Sources 24:471–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boateng AA (2007) Characterization and thermal conversion of charcoal derived from fluidized-bed fast pyrolysis oil production of switchgrass. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:8857–8862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan AA, de Jong W, Jansens PJ, Spliethoff H (2009) Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process Technol 90:21–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lv D, Xu M, Liu X, Zhan Z, Li Z, Yao H (2010) Effect of cellulose, lignin, alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel Proc Technol 91:903–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ro KS, Cantrell KB, Hunt PG (2010) High-temperature pyrolysis of blended animal manure for producing renewable energy and value added biochar. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:10125–10131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Antal MJ, Grønli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:1619–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown R (2009) Biochar production technology. Biochar for environmental management. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management science and technology. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R (2009) Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO, Glen Osmond, Australia. Available at: http://www.csiro.au/files/files/poei.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2012

  9. Boateng AA, Mullen CA, Goldberg N, Hicks KB, Jung HJ, Lamb JF (2008) Production of biofuel from alfalfa stems by fluidized-bed fast pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:4115–4122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laird DA (2008) The charcoal vision: a win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitehead DC (2000) Nutrient elements in grasslands: soil–plant–animal relationships. CABI, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Sistani KR, Novak JM (2006) Trace metal accumulation, movement and remediation in soils receiving animal manure. In: Prasad MN, Sajwan KS, Naidu R (eds) Trace elements in the environment, biogeochemistry, biotechnology, and bioremediation. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novak JM, Lima IM, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC et al (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Obernberger F, Biedermann F, Widmann W, Riedl R (1997) Concentrations of inorganic elements in biomass fuels and recovery in the different ash fractions. Biomass Bioenergy 12:211–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Demirbas A (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on biochar yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrol 72:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agriculture use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arvelakis S, Koukios EG (2002) Physiochemical upgrading of agro-residues as feedstocks for energy production via thermochemical conversion methods. Biomass Bioenergy 22:331–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fahmi R, Bridgewater I, Donnison I, Yates N, Jones JM (2008) The effect of lignin and inorganic species in biomass on pyrolysis oil yields, quality, and stability. Fuel 87:1230–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Raveendran K, Ganesh A, Khilar KC (1996) Pyrolysis characteristics of biomass and biomass components. Fuel 75:987–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Quyn DM, Wu HW, Bhattacharya SP, Li CZ (2002) Volatilization and catalytic effects of alkali and alkaline earth metallic species during pyrolysis and gasification of Victorian brown coal. Part II. Effect of chemical form and valence. Fuel 81:151–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu HW, Quyn DM, Li CZ (2002) Volatilization and catalytic effects of alkali and alkaline earth metallic species during the pyrolysis and gasification of Victorian brown coal. Part III. The importance of the interaction between volatiles and char at high temperature. Fuel 81:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Milesi C, Elvidge CD, Nemani RR, Running SW (2003) Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sens Environ 86:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. USDA (2010) A USDA Regional Roadmap to Meeting the Biofuel Goals of the Renewable Fuels Standard by 2022. Available at: http://www.usda.gov/documents/USDA_Biofuel_Report_6232010.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2012

  26. Kellogg RL, Lander CH, Moffitt DC, Gollehon N (2000) Manure nutrients relative to the capacity of cropland and pastureland to assimilate nutrients: Spatial and temporal trends for the United States. USDA-NRCS-ERS-Publ. No. NPS00-0579

  27. Cantrell KB, Martin JH (2012) State-space temperature regulation development of biochar production Part II: Application to manure processing via pyrolysis. J Sci Food Agric 92:490–495

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lima IM, Marshall WE (2005) Granular activated carbon from broiler manure: physical, chemical, and absorptive properties. Bioresour Technol 96:699–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Toles CA, Marshall WE, Johns MM (1998) Phosphoric acid activation of nutshells for metals and organic remediation: process optimization. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 72:255–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergman PCA, Kiel JHA (2005) Torrefaction for biomass upgrading. 14th European Biomass Conference, Paris, France. 17–21 October 2005. Available at: http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2005/rx-0180.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2012

  31. Bourgois J, Guyonnet R (1988) Characterization and analysis of torrified wood. Wood Sci Technol 22:143–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bridgeman TC, Jones JM, Williams A, Waldron DJ (2010) An investigation of the grindability of two torrified energy crops. Fuel 89:3911–3918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Phanphanich M, Mani S (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol 102:1246–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Repellin V, Govin A, Rolland M, Guyonnet R (2010) Energy requirement for fine grinding of torrified wood. Biomass Bioenergy 34:923–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM (2006) Petroleum products, lubricants, and fossil fuels: gaseous fuels, coal, and coke. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  36. USEPA (2005) Title 40—Protection of Environment. Standards for the use or disposal of sewage sludge. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40, Pt. 503. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  37. USEPA (1996) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. Methods SW-846 Method 3052: microwave assisted acid digestions of siliceous and organically based matrices. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw 846/pdfs/3052.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2012

  38. Wang X, Cook S, Tao S, Xing B (2007) Sorption of organic contaminants by biopolymers: role of polarity, structure and domain spatial arrangement. Chemosphere 66:1476–1484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cantrell KB, Martin JH, Ro KS (2010) Application of thermogravimetric analysis for the proximate analysis of livestock wastes. J ASTM Int 7: Paper ID JAI102583

  40. Biagini E, Barontini F, Tognotti L (2006) Devolatilization of biomass fuels and biomass components studies by TG/FTIR technique. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:4486–4493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Ro KS, Stone KC, Vanotti MB, Burns JC (2010) Thermogravimetric characterization of irrigated Bermuda grass as a combustion feedstock. Trans ASABE 53:413–420

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bridgeman TG, Jones JM, Shield I, Williams PT (2008) Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel 87:844–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Erggundenler A, Ghaly AE (1992) Determination of reaction kinetics of wheat straw using thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 34(35):75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu Q, Wang S, Zheng Y, Luo Z, Cen K (2008) Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG–FTIR analyses. J Anal Appl Pyrol 82:170–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. González JF, Román S, Encinar JM, Martínez G (2009) Pyrolysis of various biomass residues and char utilization for the production of activated carbons. J Anal Appl Pyrol 85:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y et al (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and application of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:89–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cao X, Ro KS, Chappell M, Li Y, Mao J (2011) Chemical structures of swine-manure char produced under different carbonization conditions investigated by advanced solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Energy Fuel 25:388–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Inyang M, Gao B, Pullammanappallil P, Ding W, Zimmerman AR (2010) Biochar from anaerobically digested sugar cane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 101:8868–8872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yan Q, Toghiani H, Yu F, Cai Z, Zhang J (2011) Effects of pyrolysis conditions on yield of bio-chars from pine chips. For Prod J 5:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  50. Parikh J, Channiwala S, Ghosal G (2005) A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel 84:487–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nahm KH (2003) Evaluation of nitrogen content in poultry manure. World Poult Sci J 59:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Asadullah M, Zhang S, Min Z, Yimsiri P, Li C-Z (2010) Effect of biomass char structures on its gasification reactivity. Bioresour Technol 101:7935–7943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP et al (2011) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989

    Google Scholar 

  54. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soil in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Baldock JA, Smernik RJ (2002) Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus renosa (red pine) wood. Org Geochem 33:1093–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun H, Hockaday WC, Masiello CA, Zygourakis K (2012) Multiple controls on the chemical and physical structures of biochars. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3587–3597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zolin A, Jensen A, Jensen PA, Frandsen F, Dim-Johansen K (2001) The influence of inorganic materials on the thermal deactivation of fuel chars. Energy Fuel 15:1110–1122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR Jr, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54:17–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Demirbas A (2005) Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31:171–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang C, Wang Q, Yang Q, Liang R (2009) Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of wheat straw with added coal during combustion. Biomass Bioenergy 33:50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen Y, Mori S, Pan WP (1995) Estimating the combustibility of various coals by TG–DTA. Energy Fuel 9:71–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Whitely N, Ozao R, Artiaga R, Cao Y, Pan WP (2006) Multi-utilization of chicken litter as a biomass source. Part I. Combustion. Energy Fuel 20:2660–2665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fahmi R, Bridgewater A, Darvell L, Jones J, Yates N, Thain S et al (2007) The effect of alkali metals on combustion and pyrolysis of Lolium and Festuca grasses, switchgrass, and willow. Fuel 86:1560–1569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hwang IH, Nakajima D, Matsuto T, Sugimoto T (2008) Improving the quality of waste-derived char by removing ash. Waste Manage 28:424–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication is based on work supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, and under the ARS–GRACEnet project. The authors express gratitude to collaborators who manufactured the chars used in this study and to Barry Glaz, Jerry H. Martin II and Sheeneka Green in sample preparation and analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Novak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novak, J.M., Cantrell, K.B. & Watts, D.W. Compositional and Thermal Evaluation of Lignocellulosic and Poultry Litter Chars via High and Low Temperature Pyrolysis. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 114–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9228-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9228-9

Keywords

Navigation