Neuroethics

pp 1–8

Addiction Doesn’t Exist, But it is Bad for You

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-016-9298-z

Cite this article as:
Flanagan, O. Neuroethics (2017). doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9298-z

Abstract

There is a debate about the nature of addiction, whether it is a result of brain damage, brain dysfunction, or normal brain changes that result from habit acquisition, and about whether it is a disease. I argue that the debate about whether addiction is a disease is much ado about nothing, since all parties agree it is “unquestionably destructive.” Furthermore, the term ‘addiction’ has disappeared from recent DSM’s in favor of a spectrum of ‘abuse’ disorders. This may be a good thing indicating more nuance in typing the heterogeneous phenomena we used to call ‘addiction’.

Keywords

Addiction Addict Deep learning DSM-5 Lewis NIDA Volkow 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA