Neuroethics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 69–84

Happiness, Cerebroscopes and Incorrigibility: Prospects for Neuroeudaimonia

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-016-9254-y

Cite this article as:
Hare, S.M. & Vincent, N.A. Neuroethics (2016) 9: 69. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9254-y

Abstract

Suppose you want to live a happy life. Who should you turn to for advice? We normally think that we know best about our own happiness. But recent work in psychology and neuroscience suggests that we are often mistaken about our own natures, and that sometimes scientists know us better than we know ourselves. Does this mean that to live a happy life we should ask scientists for advice rather than relying on our introspection? In what follows, we highlight ways in which the science of happiness could help us live happy lives, but we also argue that, in other ways, our navel gazing will remain indispensable.

Keywords

Happiness fMRI IAT Incorrigibility 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuroscience InstituteGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Neuroscience Institute, and College of LawAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of PhilosophyTechnische Universiteit, DelftDelftThe Netherlands