Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Investigation of neural and cognitive processes underlying individual variation in moral preferences is underway, with notable similarities emerging between moral- and risk-based decision-making. Here we specifically assessed moral distributive justice preferences and non-moral financial gambling preferences in the same individuals, and report an association between these seemingly disparate forms of decision-making. Moreover, we find this association between distributive justice and risky decision-making exists primarily when the latter is assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task. These findings are consistent with neuroimaging studies of brain function during moral and risky decision-making. This research also constitutes the first replication of a novel experimental measure of distributive justice decision-making, for which individual variation in performance was found. Further examination of decision-making processes across different contexts may lead to an improved understanding of the factors affecting moral behaviour.
- Hsu, M., C. Anen, et al. 2008. The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science 320: 1092–1095. CrossRef
- Sanfey, A.G., J.K. Rilling, et al. 2003. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300: 1755–1758. CrossRef
- Knutson, B., and S.M. Greer. 2008. Anticipatory affect: Neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 3771–3786. CrossRef
- Lawrence, N.S., F. Jollant, et al. 2008. Distinct roles of prefrontal cortical subregions in the Iowa gambling task. Cerebral Cortex 19: 1134–1143. CrossRef
- Shenhav, A., and J.D. Greene. 2010. Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron 67: 667–677. CrossRef
- Tobler, P.N., A. Kalis, et al. 2008. The role of moral utility in decision-making: An interdisciplinary framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 390–401. CrossRef
- Hare, T.A., C.F. Camerer, et al. 2010. Value computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition. The Journal of Neuroscience 30: 583–590. CrossRef
- Tricomi, E., A. Rangel, et al. 2010. Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature 463: 1089–1091. CrossRef
- de Quervain, D.J.-F., U. Fischbacher, et al. 2004. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305: 1254–1258. CrossRef
- Xue, G., Z. Lu, et al. 2009. Functional dissociations of risk and reward processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 19: 1019–1027. CrossRef
- Knoch, D., and E. Fehr. 2007. Resisting the power of temptations. The right prefrontal cortex and self-control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1104: 123–134. CrossRef
- Bechara, A., D. Tranel, et al. 2000. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 123: 2189–2202. CrossRef
- Buelow, M.T., and J.A. Suhr. 2009. Construct validity of the Iowa gambling task. Neuropsychology Review 19: 102–114. CrossRef
- Brand, M., E.C. Recknor, et al. 2007. Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 29: 86–99. CrossRef
- Rogers, R.D., A.M. Owen, et al. 1999. Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 20: 9029–9038.
- Fishbein, D., C. Hyde, et al. 2005. Cognitive performance and autonomic reactivity in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 13: 25–40. CrossRef
- Lejuez, C.W., J.P. Read, et al. 2002. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8: 75–84. CrossRef
- Lejuez, C.W., W.M. Aklin, et al. 2003. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 11: 26–33. CrossRef
- Dahlbäck, O. 1990. Personality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences 11: 1235–1242. CrossRef
- Cohen, B.H., and R. Brooke Lea. 2004. Essentials of statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Chichester: Wiley.
- Steiger, J.H. 1980. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin 87: 245–251. CrossRef
- Fehr, E., and U. Fischbacher. 2004. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 25: 63–87. CrossRef
- Franken, H.A., J.W. Van Strien, et al. 2008. Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits. Psychiatry Research 158: 155–163. CrossRef
- Monterosso, J., R. Ehrman, et al. 2001. Three decision-making tasks in cocaine-dependent patients: Do they measure the same construct? Addiction 96: 1825–1837. CrossRef
- Skeel, R.L., J. Neudecker, et al. 2007. The utility of personality variables and behaviorally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 43: 203–214. CrossRef
- Skeel, R.L., C. Pilarski, et al. 2008. Personality and performance-based measures in the prediction of alcohol use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 22: 402–409. CrossRef
- Upton, D.J., A.J. Bishara, et al. 2011. Propensity for risk taking and trait impulsivity in the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences 50: 492–495. CrossRef
- Loewenstein, G., S. Rick, et al. 2008. Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 647–672. CrossRef
- Huettel, S.A. 2010. Ten challenges for decision neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroscience 4: 1–7. CrossRef
- Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458. CrossRef
- Greene, J.D., R.B. Sommerville, et al. 2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 2105–2108. CrossRef
- Rachels, J., and S. Rachels (eds.). 2010. The elements of moral philosophy, 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Henrich, J., R. Boyd, et al. 2005. “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 795–855.
- Zyphur, M.J., J. Narayanan, et al. 2009. The genetics of economic risk preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22: 367–377. CrossRef
- Adida, M., L. Clark, et al. 2008. Lack of insight may predict impaired decision making in manic patients. Bipolar Disorders 10: 829–837. CrossRef
- Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?
Volume 6, Issue 1 , pp 97-103
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Decision making
- Distributive justice
- Individual differences
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Perceptual and Clinical Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology & Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
- 2. Monash Philosophy & Cognition Lab, Philosophy Department, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
- 3. Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia