Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Investigation of neural and cognitive processes underlying individual variation in moral preferences is underway, with notable similarities emerging between moral- and risk-based decision-making. Here we specifically assessed moral distributive justice preferences and non-moral financial gambling preferences in the same individuals, and report an association between these seemingly disparate forms of decision-making. Moreover, we find this association between distributive justice and risky decision-making exists primarily when the latter is assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task. These findings are consistent with neuroimaging studies of brain function during moral and risky decision-making. This research also constitutes the first replication of a novel experimental measure of distributive justice decision-making, for which individual variation in performance was found. Further examination of decision-making processes across different contexts may lead to an improved understanding of the factors affecting moral behaviour.
- Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?
Volume 6, Issue 1 , pp 97-103
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Decision making
- Distributive justice
- Individual differences
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Perceptual and Clinical Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology & Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
- 2. Monash Philosophy & Cognition Lab, Philosophy Department, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
- 3. Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia