Pardo, Michael S., and Dennis Patterson. forthcoming 2010. “Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience,” Univ. of Illinois Law Review
, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1338763
Glannon, Walter. 2009. Our brains are not us. Bioethics
Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads.
Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soc’y London
Bennett, Maxwell, and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience, 68–74.
Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Haidt. 2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Chorvat, Terrence, and Kevin McCabe. 2006. The Brain and the Law. In Law & the Brain, eds. Semir Zeki, and Oliver Goodenough, 128.
Sanfey, Alan G., et al. 2006. Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Goodenough, Oliver R. 2001. Mapping cortical areas associated with legal reasoning and moral intuition. Jurimetrics Journal 41: 420.
Bennett M.R., and P.M.S. Hacker. 2008. A History of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Mikhail, John. 2009. Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: A formal model of unconscious moral and legal knowledge. Psychology of Learning and Motivation
50: 27. 28.CrossRef
Hauser, Marc D. 2006. Moral Minds 42.
Mikhail, John. 2007. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
11: 143. 148.CrossRef
Baker, G.P., and P.M.S. Hacker. 2005 Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning (Volume 1 of An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations) 185 (2d ed., Revised by P.M.S. Hacker 2005).
Patterson, Dennis. 2006. Dworkin on the semantics of legal and political concepts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Bennett, Maxwell, and Peter Hacker. 2007. The Conceptual Presuppositions of Cognitive Neuroscience. In Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind and Language, eds. Maxwell Bennett, Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, and John Searle, 151.
Goodenough, Oliver R. 2001. Mapping cortical areas associated with legal reasoning and moral intuition. Jurimetrics Journal 41: 429. 436.
Patterson, Dennis. 1996. Law and Truth 71–98.
Quine, W.V. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 51–55. Columbia University Press.
Baker, G.P., and P.M.S. Hacker. 1980. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning (Volume 2 of An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations). Blackwell, p. 667.
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind, 25–61.
Hetherington, Stephen. 2006. How to Know (that Knowledge-That is Knowledge-How). In Epistemology Futures, ed. Hetherington, 71–94.
Bennett, M.R., and P.M.S. Hacker. 2008. A History of Cognitive Neuroscience 96.
Bauby, Jean-Dominique. 1997. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.
Arizona, Clark v. 2006. 548 U.S. 735, 747.
Eyal, Aharoni, et al. 2008. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
O’Hara, Erin Ann. 2004. How neuroscience might advance the law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London
Farwell, Lawrence A., and Sharon S. Smith. 2001. Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite effort to conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46: 135.
Giridharadas, Anand. “India’s Novel Use of Brain Scans in Courts is Debated,” NY Times, Sept. 14, 2008.
Kozel, F.Andrew, et al. 2005. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry
Langleben, D.D. 2002. Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage
Fallis, Don. 2009. What is lying? Journal of Philosophy 106: 29.
Milton, John, et al. 2007. The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage
Monteleone, George T., et al. 2009. Detection of deception using fmri: better than chance, but well below perfection. Social Neuroscience