Date: 22 Jun 2010
The Paradox of Addiction Neuroscience
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Neuroscience has substantially advanced the understanding of how changes in brain biochemistry contribute to mechanisms of tolerance and physical dependence via exposure to addictive drugs. Many scientists and mental health advocates scaffold this emerging knowledge by adding the imprimatur of disease, arguing that conceptualizing addiction as a “brain disease” will reduce stigma amongst the folk. Promoting a brain disease concept is grounded in beneficent and utilitarian thinking: the language makes room for individuals living with addiction to receive the same level of compassion and access to healthcare services as individuals living with other medical diseases, and promotes enlightened social and legal policies. However such claims may yield unintended consequences by fostering discrimination commonly associated with pathology. Specifically, the language of neuroscience used to describe addiction may reduce attitudes such as blame and responsibility while inadvertently identifying addicted persons as neurobiological others. In this paper, we examine the merits and limitations of adopting the language of neuroscience to describe addiction. We argue that the reframing of addiction in the language of neuroscience provides benefits such as the creation of empowered biosocial communities, but also creates a new set of risks, as descriptive neuroscience concepts are inseparable from historical attitudes and intuitions towards addiction and addicted persons. In particular, placing emphasis on the diseased brain may foster unintended harm by paradoxically increasing social distance towards the vulnerable group the term is intended to benefit.
Shaffer, Howard J. 1986. Conceptual crises and the addictions: A philosophy of science perspective. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 3: 285–296.CrossRef
Rüsch, Nicolas, Matthias C. Angermeyer, and Patrick W. Corrigan. 2005. Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry 20: 529–539.CrossRef
Churchland, Paul M. 1981. Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.CrossRef
Churchland, Patricia S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge: MIT.
Watters, Ethan. The Americanization of Mental Illness, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10psyche-t.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Accessed 8 January, 2010.
Robbins, Trevor W., and B.J. Everitt. 1996. Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6: 228–236.CrossRef
Volkow, Nora D., Joanna S. Fowler, and Gene-Jack Wang. 2004. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: Brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology 47: 3–13.CrossRef
Boyce, W. Thomas. 2006. Symphonic causation and the origins of childhood psychopathology. In Developmental Psychopathology, 2nd Ed. Vol. 2: Developmental Neuroscience, eds Dante Chichetti and Donald J. Cohen, 797-817. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kalant, Harold. 2010. What neurobiology cannot tell us about addiction. Addiction 105:780–789.
Leshner, Alan I. 1997. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science 278: 45–57.CrossRef
Kosten, Thomas R. 1998. Addiction as a brain disease. The American Journal of Psychiatry 155: 711–713.
Volkow, Nora D., and Joanna S. Fowler. 2000. Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10: 318–325.CrossRef
Dackis, Charles, and Charles O’Brien. 2005. Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and Public Policy Ramifications. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1431–1436.CrossRef
Volkow, Nora D., and Ting-Kai Li. 2004. Drug addiction: The neurobiology of behaviour gone awry. Nature 5: 963–970.
Goldstein, Rita Z., A.D. Bud Craig, Antoine Bechara, Hugh Garavan, Anna Rose Childress, Martin P. Paulus, and Nora D. Volkow. 2009. Trends in Cognitive Science 13: 372–380.CrossRef
Bonoiu, Adela C., Supriya D. Mahajan, Hong Ding, et al. 2009. Nanotechnology approach for drug addiction therapy: Gene silencing using delivery of gold nonorod-siRNA. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901715106.
Jorm, Anthony F., Ailsa E. Korten, Patricia A. Jacomb, Helen Christensen, Bryan Rodgers, and Penelope Pollitt. 1997. Mental health literacy: A survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Medical Journal of Australia 166: 182–186.
Wakefield, Jerome C. 1992. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47: 373–388.
Conrad, Peter, and Joseph W. Schneider. 1992. Deviance and medicalization. From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rush, Benjamin. 1823. An inquiry into the effects of ardent spirits upon the human body and mind: With an account of the means of preventing, and of the remedies for curing them, 8th ed. Boston: James Loring.
Levine, Harry Gene. 1978. The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 39: 143–174.
Jellineck, E.M. 1960. The disease concept of alcoholism. New Haven: Hillhouse.
Alcoholics Anonymous. 2009. Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. http://www.aa.org Accessed 14 November 2009.
White, William. 2000. Addiction as disease: The birth of a concept. The Counselor 1: 46–51.
Erickson, Patricia. 1980. Cannabis criminals: The social effects of punishment on drug users. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
Stevens, Alex. 2007. When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime. Critical Social Policy 27: 77–99.CrossRef
Cape, Gavin S. 2003. Addiction, stigma and movies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107: 163–169.CrossRef
National Institutes of Health. Spring. 2007. The sciences of addiction: drugs, brains, and behavior. National Institutes of Health: Medline Plus http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/magazine/issues/spring07/articles/spring07pg14-17.html Accessed 14 November 2009.
S.1011. 2007. Recognizing addiction as a disease act of 2007.110th Congress in the Senate of the United States. Available at help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_06.../S1011%20Post%20Mark%20Up.pdf.
Rose, Nikolas. 2003. The neurochemical self and its anomalies. In Risk and morality, ed. Ericson Richard and Doyle Aaron, 407–437. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lane, Christopher. 2007. Shyness: How normal behavior became a sickness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Summerfield, Derek. 2005. What exactly is emergency or disaster “mental health”? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83: 76–77.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2008. Drug Abuse and Addiction. http://www.nida.nih.gov/scienceofaddiction/addiction.html. Accessed January 8, 2010.
Rosenberg, Charles E. 2006. Contested boundaries: Psychiatry, disease, and diagnosis. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 49: 407–424.CrossRef
Martin, Emily. 2007. Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hacking, Ian. 1995. The looping effects of human kinds. In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary approach, ed. D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. James-Premack, 351–383. Oxford: Clarendon.
Erickson, Carlton K., and William L. White. 2009. The neurobiology of addiction recovery. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 27: 338–345.CrossRef
Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality: Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Novas, Carols, and Nicolas Rose. 2004. Biological citizenship. In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, ed. Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier. London: Blackwell.
Ortega, Francisco. 2009. The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties 4: 425–445.CrossRef
Fenton, Andrew, and Tim Krahn. 2007. Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the ‘normal’. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2: http://www.jemh.ca.
Hacking, Ian. 2006. Genetics, biosocial groups & the future of identity. Daedalus Fall: 81–95.
Racine, Eric, Ofek Bar-Ilan, and Judy Illes. 2005. fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 159–164.CrossRef
BBC News. January 4, 2007. Shopping urges ‘spotted in brain’. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6229137.stm Accessed 15 December, 2009.
McKnight, Peter. November 22, 2008. Addicts and homeless perceived as objects. Vancouver Sun: C5.
van Fraassen, Bas C. 2008. Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dumit, Joseph. 2003. Is it me or my brain? Depression and neuroscientific facts. Journal of Medical Humanities 24: 35–46.CrossRef
Huber, Lara. 2009. Imaging the brain: Visualising “pathological entities”? Searching for reliable protocols within psychiatry and their impact on the understanding of psychiatric diseases. Poiesis Prax 6: 27–41.CrossRef
Vrecko, Scott. 2006. Folk neurology and the remaking of identity. Molecular Interventions 6: 300–303.CrossRef
Jackson, Grace E. 2006. A curious consensus: “Brain scans prove disease”? Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry 8: 55–60.CrossRef
Kant, Immanuel. 1785/1959. Foundation of the metaphysics of morals. Lewis White Beck, trans. New York: Bobs-Merrill.
Hall, W. 2006. Stereotactic neurosurgical treatment of addiction: Minimizing the chances of another great and desperate cure. Addiction 101: 1–3.
Roskies, Adina. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron 35: 21–23.CrossRef
Link, Bruce, and Jo Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review in Sociology 27: 363–385.CrossRef
Roberts, Laura Weiss, and Laura B. Dunn. 2003. Ethical considerations in caring for women with substance use disorders. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 30: 559–582.CrossRef
Schaller, Mark, Justin H. Park, and Jason Faulkner. 2003. Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European Review of Social Psychology 14: 105–137.CrossRef
Kurzban, Robert, and Mark R. Leary. 2001. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin 127: 187–208.CrossRef
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108: 814–834.CrossRef
Damasio, Antonio. 1996. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351: 1413–1420.CrossRef
Devos, Thierry, and Mahzarin Banaji. 2003. Implicit self and identity. In Handbook of self and identity, ed. M.R. Leary and J.P. Tagney, 153–175. New York: Guilford.
Gillett, Grant. 2009. The mind and its discontents, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kelly, John F., and Cassandra M. Westerhoff. 2009. Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms. International Journal of Drug Policy, in press.
Ross, Patricia A. 2005. Sorting out the concept ‘disorder’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26: 115–140.CrossRef
Buchman, Daniel, and Peter B. Reiner. 2009. Stigma and addiction: Being and becoming. The American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience 9: 18–19.CrossRef
Nahmias, Eddy, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Jason Turner. 2005. Surveying freedom: Folk inuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology 18: 561–584.CrossRef
Nichols, Shaun. 2006. Folk intuitions on free will. Journal of Cognition and Culture 12: 57–86.CrossRef
Feltz, Adam, and Edward Cokely. 2009. Do Judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are?: Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition 18: 342–350.CrossRef
Vohs, Kathleen D., and Jonathan W. Schooler. 2008. The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science 19: 49–54.CrossRef
de Brigard, Felipe, Eric Mandelbaum, and David Ripley. 2009. Responsibility and the brain sciences. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Epub Ahead of Print.
Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359: 1775–1785.CrossRef
Marie, Dannette, and Brad Miles. 2008. Social distance and perceived dangerousness across four diagnostic categories of mental disorder. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42: 126–133.CrossRef
Mehta, Sheila, and Amerigo Farina. 1997. Is being sick really better? Effect of the disease view of mental disorder on stigma. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 16: 405–419.CrossRef
Priggs, Merle, Craig A. Colsson, and Wayne Hall. 2008. How will information about the genetic risk of mental disorders impact on stigma? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42(3): 214–220.
Phelan, Jo C., Rosangely Cruz-rojas, and Marian Reiff. 2002. Genes and stigma: The connection between perceived genetic etiology and attitudes and beliefs about mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills 6: 159–185.CrossRef
Phelan, Jo. 2005. Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: The case of mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46: 307–322.CrossRef
Weiner, Bernard. 1995. Judgements of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
Gaylin, Willard. 2009. Behavior control: From the brain to the mind. Hastings Center Report 39: 13–16.CrossRef
Illes, Judy, Mary Anne Moser, Jennifer B. McCormick, Eric Racine, Sandra Blakeslee, Arthur Caplan, Erika Check Hayden, Jay Ingram, Tiffany Lohwater, Peter McKnight, Christie Nicholson, Anthony Phillips, Kevin D Sauve, Elaine Snell, and Samuel Weiss. 2010. Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11: 61–69.
Buchman, Daniel, Wayne Skinner, and Judy Illes. 2010. Negotiating the relationship between addiction, ethics, and brain science. The American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience, 1: 36–45.
- The Paradox of Addiction Neuroscience
Volume 4, Issue 2 , pp 65-77
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Brain disease
- Author Affiliations
- 1. National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
- 2. National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- 3. National Core for Neuroethics, Department of Psychiatry and Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada