Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Placebo as a Provocative Test in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Non Epileptic Seizures

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychogenic non epileptic seizures (PNES) are clinical events of psychological nature. Video-electroencephalography monitoring (V-EEGM) is a valuable method for the diagnosis of PNES and may be combined with provocative tests to induce seizures. The use of placebo in provocative tests for the diagnosis of PNES is controversial because of associated deception, and contrasts with the use of truly decreasing epileptogenic threshold techniques such as hyperventilation and photo stimulation. We present a clinical case of a pregnant woman with a past history of refractory epilepsy, admitted in the obstetric department due to unremitting seizures. In this clinical context, non-deceiving provocative tests such as hyperventilation and photo stimulation could be potentially harmful, nevertheless, the use of intravenous saline injection presented as a safer alternative to diagnose PNES and hence obviate an urgent caesarean. This case illustrates a disproportionate risk of causing harm when telling the truth, in comparison with the benefit of avoiding such risk, although deceiving the patient. This is a clinical example of how considerations concerning the use of placebo must be evaluated in an individual basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gates, J.R., V. Ramani, S. Whalen, and R. Loewenson. 1985. Ictal characteristics of pseudoseizures. Archives of Neurology 42: 1183–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benbadis, S.R., V. Agrawal, and W.O. Tatum 4th. 2001. How many patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures also have epilepsy? Neurology 57: 915–917.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benbadis, S.R. 1997. What can EEG-video monitoring do for you and your patients? Journal of the Florida Medical Association 84: 320–322.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luther, J.S., J.O. McNamara, S. Carwile, P. Miller, and V. Hope. 1982. Pseudoepileptic seizures: methods and video analysis to aid diagnosis. Annals of Neurology 12: 458–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slater, J.D., M.C. Brown, W. Jacobs, and R.E. Ramsay. 1995. Induction of pseudoseizures with intravenous saline placebo. Epilepsia 36: 580–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benbadis, S.R., K. Johnson, K. Anthony, et al. 2000. Induction of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures without placebo. Neurology 55: 1904–1905.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devinsky, O., and R. Fisher. 1996. Ethical use of placebos and provocative testing in diagnosing nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 47: 866–870.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brody, H. 1982. The lie that heals: the ethics of giving placebos. Annals of Internal Medicine 97: 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leeman, B.A. 2009. Provocative techniques should not be used for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy & Behavior 15: 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benbadis, S.R., and W.A. Hauser. 2000. An estimate of the prevalence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Seizure 9: 280–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reuber, M., G. Fernandez, J. Bauer, C. Helmstaedter, C.E. Elger, et al. 2002. Diagnostic delay in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 58: 493–495.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Szaflarski, J.P., C. Hughes, M. Szaflarski, C. Hughes, et al. 2003. Quality of life in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia 44: 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benbadis SR; Agrawal V; Tatum WO. 2001. How many patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures also have epilepsy? Neurology 57: 915–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kanner, A.M., H.H. Morris, H. Luders, D.S. Dinner, et al. 1990. Supplementary motor seizures mimicking pseudoseizures: some clinical differences. Neurology 40: 1404–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ney, G.C., W.B. Barr, C. Napolitano, R. Decker, and N. Schaul. 1998. New-onset psychogenic seizures after surgery for epilepsy. Archives of Neurology 55: 726–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glosser, G., D. Roberts, and D.S. Glosser. 1999. Nonepileptic seizures after resective epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 40: 1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reuber, M., T. Kral, M. Kurthen, and C.E. Elger. 2002. New-onset psychogenic seizures after intracranial neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica 144: 901–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beecher, H.K. 1955. The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association 159: 1602–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hróbjartsson, A., and P.C. Gotzsche. 2001. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 344: 1594–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hróbjartsson, A., and P.C. Gotzsche. 2004. Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment. Journal of Internal Medicine 256: 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Senn, S.J. 2002. Ethical considerations concerning treatment allocation in drug development trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 11: 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walczak, T.S., D.T. Williams, and W. Berten. 1994. Utility and reliability of placebo infusion in the evaluation of patients with seizures. Neurology 44: 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Delgado-Escueta, A.V., and D. Janz. 1992. Consensus guidelines: preconception counselling, management, and care of the pregnant woman with epilepsy. Neurology 42: 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nulman, I., D. Laslo, and G. Koren. 1999. Treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy. Drugs 57: 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirk, E.P. 2003. Treatment by deception is bad medicine. Lancet 362: 668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Senn, S.J. 1997. Are placebo run ins justified? British Medical Journal 314: 1191–1193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henda Foreid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foreid, H., Bentes, C. & Pimentel, J. The Use of Placebo as a Provocative Test in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Non Epileptic Seizures. Neuroethics 3, 95–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9056-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-010-9056-6

Keywords

Navigation