High resolution SPECT imaging for visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity using a SPECT/CT scanner dedicated for small animal imaging
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Umeda, I.O., Tani, K., Tsuda, K. et al. Ann Nucl Med (2012) 26: 67. doi:10.1007/s12149-011-0542-7
Tumor interiors are never homogeneous and in vivo visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity would be an innovation that contributes to improved cancer therapy. But, conventional nuclear medicine tests have failed to visualize heterogeneity in vivo because of limited spatial resolution. Recently developed single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) scanners dedicated for small animal imaging are of interest due to their excellent spatial resolution of <1 mm, but few studies have focused on the evaluation of intratumoral heterogeneity. We investigated the optimal conditions related to high resolution imaging of heterogeneous tumor interiors using a small animal SPECT scanner.
The conditions related to SPECT/CT visualization of heterogeneous tumor interiors were investigated using phantoms with 111In and simulations of actual small animal imaging. The optimal conditions obtained were validated by in vivo imaging of sarcoma 180-bearing mice.
Larger number of counts must be obtained within limited acquisition time to visualize tumor heterogeneity in vivo in animal imaging, compared to cases that simply detect tumors. At an acquisition time of 30 min, better image quality was obtained with pinhole apertures diameter of 1.4 mm than of 1.0 mm. The obtained best spatial resolution was 1.3 mm, it was acceptable for our purpose, though a little worse than the best possible performance of the scanner (1.0 mm). Additionally, the reconstruction parameters, such as noise suppression, voxel size, and iteration/subset number, needed to be optimized under the limited conditions and were different from those found under the ideal condition. The minimal radioactivity concentration for visualization of heterogeneous tumor interiors was estimated to be as high as 0.2–0.5 MBq/mL. Liposomes containing 111In met this requirement and were administered to tumor-bearing mice. SPECT imaging successfully showed heterogeneous 111In distribution within the tumors in vivo with good spatial resolution. A threshold of 0.2 MBq/g for clear visualization of tumor heterogeneity was validated. Autoradiograms obtained ex vivo of excised tumors confirmed that the in vivo SPECT images accurately depicted the heterogeneous intratumoral accumulation of liposomes.
Intratumoral heterogeneity was successfully visualized under the optimized conditions using a SPECT/CT scanner.
KeywordsSmall animal SPECT Tumor heterogeneity 111In Liposome
Radionuclide imaging such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can visualize in vivo physiological function even in deep sites of the body with high sensitivity and excellent quantitative capability and are powerful tools for cancer imaging . These techniques can detect tumor masses in vivo, but they cannot visualize interiors of tumor masses because the spatial resolution of conventional radionuclide imaging devices is quite poor (>5 mm for PET and >8 mm for SPECT). However, tumors are never homogeneous. Therefore, a technique with the ability to clearly visualize intratumoral heterogeneity in vivo would be an innovation that improves cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Recently, SPECT scanners dedicated for small animal imaging have been developed and have shown excellent spatial resolution of <1 mm [2, 3, 4, 5]. They appear to hold potential for visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity in vivo. However, most studies on high spatial resolution using these scanners have been conducted with phantoms under ideal conditions [6, 7, 8], and little work has been done with actual small animal imaging. A few studies have reported in vivo SPECT images of small animals with excellent resolution [2, 9]; however, the administered radioactivity in these studies was approximately 200–900 MBq per head using 99mTc- or 123I-labeled probes. This dosage is very high for actual small animal imaging, and hence, is likely to induce very high radiation in the animals . On the other hand, very recently, increasing numbers of studies have reported the use of these scanners for tumor imaging of small animals [4, 11, 12, 13, 14]. The administered radioactivity used in these studies seems to be reasonable for small animals, but instead, they visualized just tumor masses, not tumor interior, because of insufficient spatial resolution. Although a few studies have reported good resolution [11, 12], they were not necessarily optimized for in vivo high resolution tumor imaging. In this study, we investigated the acceptable and optimal conditions related to high resolution in vivo SPECT imaging for actual small animals, such as acquisition equipment and time, reconstruction parameters, and detection and dosage thresholds for visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity in vivo. We also used this technique to visualize intratumoral heterogeneity in tumor-bearing mice with fine spatial resolution using a small animal SPECT scanner.
Materials and methods
A SPECT/CT combined scanner with four detectors dedicated for small animal imaging (NanoSPECT/CT; Bioscan Inc., Washington, DC, USA) was used to acquire sectional images. Each detector was equipped with tungsten-based multiplexing nine-pinhole collimators with diameters of 1.0 or 1.4 mm and a cylindrical field of view (FOV) of 30 × 16 mm (diameter × length). The axial FOV was extended using a step-and-shoot helical SPECT with a user-definable range up to 230 mm, depending on the imaging region. The energy peaks for the camera were set to 171 and 245 keV, and the energy window was set to the peak energy ±10%. CT scans were performed with the following conditions: tube voltage, 45 kV; tube current, 177 μA; and tube current–time product (the product of the tube current and scan time), 32 mAs. CT and SPECT reconstruction was performed using InVivoScope software (Bioscan). CT images were reconstructed with the standard resolution, and SPECT image data were reconstructed by an ordered subset expectation maximization iterative algorithm dedicated for multiplexing multi-pinhole reconstruction. Three operator-dependent parameters were used during the reconstruction of the SPECT image data. They were noise suppression (low, middle, and high), voxel size (fast 0.4 mm; standard 0.3 mm; and fine 0.2 mm), and a reconstruction setting for the iteration/subset number (fast, standard, and fine). The following two sets of reconstruction parameters (conditions A and B) were used in this study. For noise suppression, voxel size, and reconstruction setting, the values were low (25% of voxel size), fine, and fine for condition A, respectively, and middle (35%), standard, and standard for condition B, respectively. The SPECT/CT fusion images were obtained using the automatic fusion software installed on the scanner.
System performance evaluation by measurement of the spatial resolution and sensitivity of the SPECT scanner
A Jaszczak phantom with hot rods ranging in diameter from 1.0 to 1.5 mm (Bioscan), which was filled with 100 MBq (50 MBq/mL) of 111InCl3 solution (kind gift by Nihon Medi-Physics, Tokyo, Japan), was imaged according to the procedure described above, using the SPECT scanner equipped with 1.0- and 1.4-mm diameter pinhole apertures. Projection image data were acquired in the step-and-shoot mode from 128 directions over 360° covered by four detectors (32 directions × 4 detectors). The total acquisition count was set at 300 Mcounts. Consequently, the total acquisition time was several hours. The acquired image data were reconstructed using conditions A and B mentioned above. The reconstructed sectional images were evaluated on the basis of count profile curve methods. When the smallest count in the intercolumn space was lower than 50% of the maximum count of the columns, we judged that the columns were separately imaged. Additionally, the smallest diameter at which each column was separately imaged was defined as the spatial resolution. The sensitivity of each aperture for 111In was measured using an 111In point source. Three MBq of 111In was absorbed into a 0.15- to 0.30-mm resin bead, which was placed at the center of the FOV and imaged from 128 (32 × 4) projections with an acquisition time of 30 s per projection. Sensitivity was calculated by dividing the acquired counts per second (cps) by the radioactivity of the point source (Bq). The acquisition was repeated three times.
Measurement of the SPECT image spatial resolution under the conditions simulated conditions of small animal imaging
For simulation of actual in vivo animal imaging, a Jaszczak phantom with rods of 1.0- to 1.5-mm diameter was filled with 10 MBq (5 MBq/mL) of 111InCl3 solution. SPECT image data were acquired in the similar manner to mentioned above, except projection numbers, that is, 24 projections over 360° covered by four detectors (6 × 4). The total acquisition time was set as 5–120 min. The obtained image data were reconstructed in the same manner as described above.
Evaluation of the lower limit for visualization and quantitative linearity of the SPECT images
Six 1-mL plastic syringes with an inner diameter of 4.3 mm were filled with 111InCl3 solution with a concentration between 0 and 5.0 MBq/mL, and the image data were acquired in the same manner as above from 24 (6 × 4) views with 300 s per projection, consequently a total acquisition time was 30 min. The acquired image data were reconstructed using condition B. Regions of interest (ROIs) of the same size were placed on each syringe based on the superimposed CT images, and the radioactivity of each ROI was measured (SPECT value).
Distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC; Coatsome MC-8080) and cholesterol were purchased from NOF Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) and 8-hydroxyquinoline were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). Isoflurane was purchased from Abbott Japan (Tokyo, Japan). All other chemicals were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals or Sigma-Aldrich Japan (Tokyo, Japan).
Male ddY mice were obtained from Japan SLC Inc. (Hamamatsu, Japan). The animals were kept at 12/12-h dark–light cycles and were fed ad libitum. Sarcoma 180 tumor cells (2 × 106 cells/mouse) were subcutaneously transplanted into the left hind leg of 6- to 7-week-old mice. When the tumor weighed between 0.3 and 1.0 g, the mice were used for the experiments. All procedures were performed in accordance with the Guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Cancer Center.
Preparation of 111In-labeled liposomes at high concentration
Liposomes were composed of DSPC and cholesterol at a molar ratio of 2:1 and prepared by a lipid film hydration-extrusion method . In brief, the dried films were dispersed in 10 mM DTPA in 50 mM HEPES/5% mannitol buffer, pH 7.4, at 60°C and then repeatedly extruded through polycarbonate membrane filters (0.2-, 0.1-, and 0.05-μm pore sizes) to adjust their diameters to about 100 nm. The extra chelating ligands were removed by passage through a Sephadex G-50 (GE Healthcare Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) column. The phospholipid concentration was measured by phosphate assay. The liposomes were then labeled with 111In. To achieve a very high level of specific radioactivity, a remote loading method was used ; specifically, 111In was loaded inside the liposomes through the liposomal membranes by transchelation between the lipophilic oxine and hydrophilic DTPA ligands.
In vivo SPECT/CT imaging with high spatial resolution
The 111In-labeled liposomes (8.5–15 MBq/0.2 mL/mouse) were injected intravenously into sarcoma 180-bearing mice, and CT and SPECT images were acquired 24 or 48 h later. Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of 1.5% isoflurane, and their body temperatures were kept at about 37°C during the scans. Acquisition and reconstruction of the CT and SPECT image data were performed under the conditions optimized by the phantom studies simulating animal imaging. SPECT projection data were acquired in a step-and-shoot mode from 24 (6 × 4) views covering the whole body or the tumor site. The acquisition time was set to 150–300 s per projection, and image data were acquired from 24 projections taking a total of 1–2 h. The acquired projection data were reconstructed using InVivoScope software with condition B.
Measurement of accumulated radioactivity and autoradiography (ARG) of the excised tumors
After the in vivo imaging, the mice were killed, and the tumors were carefully excised. The excised tumors were immediately weighed, and their radioactivity was measured by means of a dose calibrator (IGC-7; Aloka Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) or an Auto Well Gamma System (ARC-380CL; Aloka). Then, the tumors were embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Japan, Tokyo, Japan), frozen and cut into 6-μm-thick sections for hematoxylin–eosin staining and 20-μm-thick sections for ARG using a cryomicrotome (CM 3050S; Leica Instruments, Germany). The sections were prepared in the same direction of SPECT slice. The section corresponding to the SPECT image was selected according to the slice thickness and used for ARG. For ARG, the samples were placed in contact with an imaging plate (MS2040; Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan), and the exposed imaging plates were analyzed with an FLA-7000 reader (Fujifilm Co.) and Multi Gauge v3.0 software (Fujifilm Co.).
The reconstruction parameters (noise suppression, voxel size, and iteration/subset number) had considerable influence on the images. Figure 1b, c shows images that were obtained from the same projection data but were reconstructed under different conditions. Figure 1b was reconstructed under condition A and Fig. 1c under condition B. The condition A image showed higher resolution than the condition B image when sufficient counts were acquired, as in the system performance evaluation experiments. However, ideal acquisition conditions were not possible in the animal imaging experiments, because a large radioactive dose cannot be administered to small animals and the animal position cannot be kept stable for such a long time. Therefore, phantom experiments simulating in vivo small animal imaging were performed.
The quantitative linearity of the SPECT images was also examined. ROIs of the same size were placed on each syringe based on the superimposed CT images, and their radioactivity was measured (SPECT value). Figure 3c, d shows the correlation between the radioactivity concentration of 111InCl3 and the SPECT value. For both concentration ranges described above, including the points under 0.1 MBq/mL, excellent linearity was shown (R2 > 0.99).
Radioactivity accumulation in the tumors that were imaged in vivo with high spatial resolution
Time after administration
Administered dose (MBq)
Tumor weight (g)
Accumulated radioactivity in the tumor
Tumor uptake (after decay correction)
The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal conditions required for SPECT with spatial resolution high enough to visualize intratumoral heterogeneity using in vivo small animal imaging. These approaches have not often been attempted because scanners with high spatial resolution were needed for this purpose. Conventional radionuclide imaging devices have shown quite poor spatial resolution. However, recently developed SPECT scanners dedicated for small animals excel at spatial resolution and appear to hold potential for intratumoral heterogeneity imaging applications. Our SPECT scanner provided excellent spatial resolution of <1 mm in the phantom study under ideal acquisition conditions (Fig. 1a). However, it included conditions such as too high radioactivity and too long acquisition time, which are not practical in actual animal experiments. For practical purpose, most imaging studies using small animal scanners employ a more reasonable radioactive dosage and acquisition time; these conditions, however, should be insufficient for visualization of tumor heterogeneity using high resolution SPECT imaging. Therefore, in the first part of our study, we investigated the acceptable and optimal conditions required for acquisition and reconstruction of images in simulating actual animal experiments with limited radioactivity and acquisition time (Fig. 2).
As a result, we determined that adjustment of three parameters was required for optimal small animal imaging. First, we found that a pinhole aperture of 1.4 mm diameter was better for our purpose than an aperture of 1.0 mm diameter. Images from the 1.0-mm aperture were slightly higher in resolution than those from the 1.4-mm aperture as shown in Fig. 1, but the differences were not significant by visual inspection. Evaluation of the obtained results showed that the number of acquired counts strongly affected the spatial resolution in the simulation of small animal imaging. We judged that the 1.4-mm aperture had an advantage because it gave sensitivity that was twice as high as that obtained using the 1.0-mm aperture, as shown by the total acquired counts that were two times higher. Second, the acquisition time should be more than 30 min under these experimental conditions for the same reason as mentioned above (to acquire a sufficient number of counts). The time required is relatively long for in vivo animal imaging. Therefore, anesthesia and the stability of the animal position are very important. Third, the reconstruction parameters, such as noise suppression, voxel size, and iteration/subset number, should be optimized for imaging with limited acquisition counts and will be different from the parameter values required for the best system performance under ideal conditions. It is very important to choose appropriate reconstruction parameters according to the experimental objectives because the image quality varies greatly depending on the chosen values, even though the images are reconstructed from the same projection data [6, 20]. The best spatial resolution obtained under these conditions was approx. 1.3 mm. It would be acceptable for our purpose, though it did not quite match the best possible performance of the scanner (1.0 mm). The deterioration in resolution was due to the limited acquisition counts. Therefore, the SPECT requirements for high resolution animal images in vivo are of necessity distinct from those that can provide the best scanner performance.
We also evaluated the lower limit of radioactivity needed for visualization in vivo. We found that radioactivity <0.1 MBq/mL could not be visualized on the scanner images under the acquisition conditions described above (Fig. 3). The threshold of radioactivity for visualization was estimated to be 0.2–0.5 MBq/mL (or g) under the examined conditions. There are few reports on the threshold for visualization with small animal dedicated SPECT scanners. Pissarek et al.  reported a threshold level of 0.4–2 MBq/g of tissue for visualization of mouse brain and heart using [99mTc] hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime, [123I] iodophenylpentadecanoic acid, and [99mTc] sestamibi using a Triad 88/Trionix system with three 6-pinhole collimators. Their values were consistent with our results, and the reported image resolution was also similar to ours. Therefore, our threshold values seem to be much to the point. We should note that very good correlation was observed between the SPECT values based on the ROI and the actual radioactivity even for levels <0.1 MBq/mL, under the visualization threshold. These results indicate the excellent quantitative performance of the scanner.
It is no easy task to accumulate radioactivity counts in the tumor higher than the threshold level mentioned above. To achieve the necessary level, administration of a substantial amount of radiopharmaceuticals, such as 10–74 MBq/mouse, would be needed. Actually, this and higher amounts of radiopharmaceuticals have been administered in studies on small animal SPECT imaging [2, 11, 13, 21, 22]. The level is almost the same as the dose per human in conventional clinical SPECT tests. On the other hand, the body weight ratio of a mouse to a human is about 1:2000–3000, and the volume that can be intravenously injected into a mouse is 0.2–0.3 mL at most. Therefore, radiopharmaceuticals with high specific activity and high concentration are needed . To meet these requirements, we used 111In-labeled liposomes. We have previously reported on the preparation of 111In-labeled liposomes with high radioactivity and excellent tumor accumulation of the liposomes [15, 16]. Currently, liposomes are drawing attention as multifunctional nanoparticles for imaging, delivery, and targeting in cancer therapy [12, 24, 25].
The 111In-labeled liposomes of 8–15 MBq were administered to the tumor-bearing mice, and their SPECT/CT images were obtained. As shown in Figs. 4, 5 and 6, the intratumoral distribution of the liposomes was successfully visualized in vivo with good spatial resolution. As shown in the serial images of Fig. 5a, the interiors of the tumors were visualized in detail in vivo and were apparently heterogeneous. Comparison of in vivo SPECT images and ARGs (Fig. 5b) confirmed the heterogeneity. The accumulated radioactivity in the tumor that could be imaged was 0.26–1.22 MBq/mL (Fig. 6), which corresponded well with the threshold for visualization that we established from the phantom experiments (Fig. 3). Previous studies have shown intratumoral heterogeneity by ex vivo ARGs [26, 27, 28], but earlier techniques have not enabled in vivo visualization of tumor interiors in detail. The results of the present study are innovative. We have already imaged hypoxia-inducible factor-1-active regions in tumors using our SPECT/CT scanner under the optimal conditions defined here .
In conclusion, the optimal conditions required for SPECT imaging with high spatial resolution that enabled visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity in in vivo small animal imaging were investigated, and detailed visualization of tumor interiors using a SPECT scanner was achieved.
The authors thank Nihon Medi-Physics for their kind donation of 111InCl3 solution. This research was partially supported by the grant from Foundation for Promotion Cancer Research, the Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for Third Term Comprehensive 10-year Strategy for Cancer Control and Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research (19659316) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.