Abstract
The term “slut” is commonly used as a disparaging remark against women in the United States. The goal of this study was to examine how the use of that term affects perceptions of both the “slut” and the “shamer” as well as how clothing choice and social class of the targets, as well as feminist identity of the participant, affect these judgments. We presented 186 self-identified feminist and non-feminist female college students with a Facebook interaction in which one woman calls another woman a “slut.” The interaction included a photograph of the target, in which she was dressed either “provocatively” or “conservatively.” Her visible Facebook profile information suggested she was part of either a lower or higher socioeconomic class. Participants generally had negative perceptions about the “shamer,” but results showed that both social class and clothing had an effect on how women perceived both the “slut” and the “shamer.” Participants’ feminist identity also played a role in shaping perceptions: self-identified feminists were more willing to spend time with the “slut” and found the “shamer” less justified in her actions than did non-feminist participants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good girls”: Gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 100–122. doi:10.1177/0190272514521220.
Attwood, F. (2007). Sluts and riot grrrls; female identity and sexual agency. Journal of Gender Studies, 16, 233–247. doi:10.1080/09589230701562921.
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.166.
Baumgardner, J., & Richards, A. (2010). Manisfesta: Young women, feminism, and the future. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Bamberg, M. (2004). Form and functions of ‘slut bashing’ in male identity constructions in15-year-olds. Human Development, 47, 331–353. doi:10.1159/000081036.
Bartow, A. (2009). Internet defamation as profit center: The monetization of online harassment. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 32, 383–429.
Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Citron, D. K. (2009). Law’s expressive value in combating cyber gender harassment. Michigan Law Review, 108, 373–415.
Clayton, K. D., & Trafimow, D. (2007). A test of three hypotheses concerning attributions toward female promiscuity. The Social Science Journal, 44, 677–686. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2007.10.003.
Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, T., & Lauren, M. (1996). Status, communality and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.25.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Feminists who flaunt it: Exploring the enjoyment of sexualization among young feminist women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2341–2349. doi:10.1111/jasp.12183.
Franks, M. A. (2012). Sexual harassment 2.0. Maryland Law Review, 71, 655–704.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.
Freedman, E. B. (2002). No turning back: The history of feminism and the future of women (1st ed.). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.
Gentry, M. (1998). The sexual double standard: The influence of number of relationships and level of sexual activity on judgments of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 505–511. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00173.x.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Bransiter, H. (2005). Evaluation of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x.
Goetz, C. D., Easton, J. A., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Women’s perceptions of sexual exploitability cues and their link to sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 999–1008. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0188-8.
Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18, 371–384. doi:10.1080/01972240290108186.
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End.
Jane, E. A. (2014). “Your a ugly, whorish, slut”: Understanding e-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 531–546. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741073.
Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 245–250. doi:10.1177/0963721411414654.
Lumsden, K., & Morgan, H. M. (2012). ‘Fraping’, ‘sexting’, ‘trolling’ and ‘rinsing’: Social networking, feminist thought and the construction of young women as victims or villains. Paper presented at the BSA Gender Study Group Conference, Leeds, UK. Downloaded from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/15756.
Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7.
Megarry, J. (2014). Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age. Women’s Studies International Forum, 74, 46–66. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012.
Montemurro, B., & Gillen, M. M. (2013). How clothes make the woman immoral: Impressions given off by sexualized clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16, 167–181. doi:10.1177/0887302X13493128.
Nier, J. A., Bajaj, P., McLean, M. C., & Schwartz, E. (2012). Group status, perceptions of agency, and the correspondence bias: Attributional processes in the formation of stereotypes about high and low status groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 476–487. doi:10.1177/1368430212454925.
Papp, L. J., Hagerman, C., Gnoleba, M. A., Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., et al. (2015). Exploring perceptions of slut-shaming on Facebook: Evidence for a reverse sexual double standard. Gender Issues, 32, 57–76. doi:10.1007/s12147-014-9133-y.
Pew Research Center. (2014). Online harassment. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/.
Poole, E. (2014). Hey girls, did you know: Slut-shaming on the internet needs to stop. University of San Francisco Law Review, 48, 221–260. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2400703.
Rahimi, R., & Liston, D. D. (2009). What does she expect when she dresses like that? Teacher interpretation of emerging adolescent female sexuality. Educational Studies, 45, 512–533. doi:10.1080/00131940903311362.
Renold, E. (2007). Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. London and New York: Routledge-Falmer.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14, 305–323. doi:10.1177/1464700113499853.
Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2012). Slut shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24, 333–343. doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.645023.
Schick, V. R., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2008). Safer, better sex through feminism: The role of feminist ideology in women’s sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 225–232. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00431.x.
Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut!: Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as a intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. doi:10.1002/ab.20413.
Valenti, J. (2007). Full frontal feminism: A young woman’s guide to why feminism matters. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.
Van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000). The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians’ perceptions of patients. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 813–828. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00338-X.
Walker, R. (1995). To be real: Telling the truth and changing the face of feminism. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x.
Winkelman, S. B., Early, J. O., Walker, A. D., Chu, L., & Yick-Flanagan, A. (2015). Exploring cyberharassment among women who use social media. Universal Journal of Public Health, 3, 194–201. doi:10.13189/ujph.2015.030504.
Wookey, M. L., Graves, N. A., & Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sex appearance on perceived competence of women. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 116–118. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.1.116-118.
Zeisler, A. (2013). New media, new feminism: Evolving feminist analysis and activism in print, and on the Web and beyond. In H. Thornham & E. Weissmann (Eds.), Renewing feminisms: Radical narratives, fantasies and futures in media studies (pp. 178–184). London: I.B. Tauris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this research involving human participants were reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at our university and were found to be in accordance with the IRB standards as well as with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papp, L.J., Erchull, M.J., Liss, M. et al. Slut-shaming on Facebook: Do Social Class or Clothing Affect Perceived Acceptability?. Gend. Issues 34, 240–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9180-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9180-7