Skip to main content
Log in

A stakeholder consultation into hydro-meteorological e-science environments

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to report on and analyse an international consultation into hydro-meteorological e-Science environments with the objective of identifying key functions and features together with exploring show-stopping issues and organisational structure. Transatlantic experiences were compared and contrasted. Including strong participation from both Europe and the USA with high quality responses from experienced practitioners, the consultation was undertaken as part of a joint initiative and took the form of an online questionnaire supported by a set of stakeholder interviews and other discussions. Topics included were functions and features such as provision of numerical models and data, usability, and ease of access; show-stopping issues such as flexibility, reliability and longevity; centralised and distributed structures, and funding models. The results demonstrated a broadly similar set of experiences and implied a future as an evolution of that which exists today. The consultation exercise ran alongside the development of the DRIHM e-Infrastructure which had, in itself, already benefitted from the prior DRIHMS consultation. Results were fed in to the development process at appropriate intervals allowing the consultation to shape the resultant services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BSD:

Berkeley Software Distribution

CESM:

Community Earth System Model project

CF:

Climate and Forecasting

CSDMS:

Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System

CUAHSI:

Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrological Science Incorporated

CUAHSI-HIS:

CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System

DRIHM:

Distributed Research Infrastructure for Hydro-Meteorology

DRIHMS:

Distributed Research Infrastructure for Hydro-Meteorology Study

DRIHM2US:

Distributed Research Infrastructure for Hydro-Meteorology to the USA

ESMF:

Earth System Modelling Framework

ECOOP:

European Coastal Operational Oceanography Project

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

FEWS:

Flood Early Warning System

FRAMES:

Framework for Risk Analysis of Multi-Media Environmental Systems

GUI:

Graphical User Interface

gUSE:

Grid and cloud User Support Environment

HMR:

Hydro-Meteorological Research

ICT:

Information and Communication Technology

LGPL:

Lesser General Public License

MoU:

Memorandum of Understanding

NetCDF:

Network Common Data Form

NWP:

Numerical Weather Prediction

OGC:

Open Geospatial Consortium

OpenMI:

Open Modelling Interface

SHIWA:

SHaring Interoperable Workflows for large-scale scientific simulations on Available DCIs

SLA:

Service Level Agreement

SDK:

Software Development Kit

WaterML:

Water Markup Language

WMO:

World Meteorological Organization

References

  • Abbott MB (1991) Hydroinformatics: information technology and the aquatic environment. Avebury Technical, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Vojinovic Z (2009) Applications of numerical modelling in hydroinformatics. J Hydroinf 11:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott MB, Tumwesigye BE, Vojinovic Z (2006) The fifth generation of modelling in hydroinformatics. In: Gourbesville P, Cunge J, Guinot V, Liong S-Y (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on hydroinformatics. Research publishing, Singapore, pp 2091–2098

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames DP, Horsburgh JS, Cao Y, Kadlec J, Whiteaker T, Valentine D (2012) HydroDesktop: web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis. Environ Model Softw 37:146–156. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasko A, Farkas Z (2011) gUSE grid and cloud science gateway http://sourceforge.net/projects/guse. Accessed 26 Mar 2013

  • Bastin L, Cornford D et al (2013) Managing uncertainty in integrated environmental modelling: the UncertWeb framework. Environ Model Softw 39:116–134. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind M, Gregersen JB (2005) Towards an open modelling Interface (OpenMI) the HarmonIT project. Adv Geosci 4:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourban S, Durand N, Turnbull M, Wilson S, Cheesman S (2012) Coastal shelf model of northern European waters to inform tidal power industry decisions. In: Bourban S, Durand N, Hervouet J-M (eds) Proceedings of XIXth TELEMAC-MASCARET user conference, 18–19 October 2012. Oxford. HR Wallingford, Wallingford, pp 143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarinha-Matos L, Afsarmanesh H, Ollus M (2005) Virtual organizations: systems and practices. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carusi A, Reimer T (2010) Virtual research environment collaborative landscape study. JISC, Bristol 106

  • Castronova AM, Goodall JL (2013) Simulating watersheds using loosely integrated model components: evaluation of computational scaling using OpenMI. Environ Model Softw 39:304–313. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CF Standard Names (2003) CF Metadata NetCDF CF Metadata Conventions Accessed 29 Apr 2014Available at: http://cf-convention.github.io/index.html

  • Collins N, Theurich G, DeLuca C, Suarez M, Trayanov A, Balaji V, Li P, Yang W, Hill C, da Silva A (2005) Design and implementation of components in the earth system modeling Famework. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 19(3):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino D, Clematis A, Galizia A, Quarati A, Danovaro E, Roverelli L, Zereik G, Kranzlmuller D, Schiffers M, Gentschen Felde N, Straube C, Parodi A, Fiori E, Delogu F, Caumont O, Richard E, Garrote L, Harpham Q, Jagers B, Dimitrijević V, Dekic L (2014) The DRIHM project: a flexible approach to integrate hpc, grid and cloud resources for hydro-meteorological research. In: Proceedings of the international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis (SC '14). IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 536–546. doi:10.1109/SC.2014.49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D'Agostino D, Danovaro E, Clematis A, Roverelli L, Zereik G, Parodi A, Galizia A (2016) Lessons learned implementing a science gateway for hydro-meteorological research. Practice and Experience, Concurrency and Computation. doi:10.1002/cpe.3700

    Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro E, Roverelli L, Zereik G, Galizia A, D’Agostino D, Quarati A, Clematis A, Delogu F, Fiori E, Parodi A, Straube C, Felde N, Harpham Q, Jagers B, Garrote L, Dekic L, Ivkovic M, Richard E, Caumont O (2014) Setup an hydro-meteo experiment in minutes: the DRIHM e-infrastructure for hydro-meteorology research. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on e-science (e-science 2014). IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 47–54. doi:10.1109/eScience.2014.40

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, I., Kesselman, C. & Tuecke, S. 2001. The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15 (Nr. 3), S. 200–222.

  • Gemmell AL, Barciela RM, Blower JD, Haines K, Harpham Q, Millard K, Price MR, Saulter A (2011) An ECOOP web portal for visualising and comparing distributed coastal oceanography model and in situ data. Ocean Sci 7(4):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German DM, Hassan AE (2009) License integration patterns: Addressing license mismatches in component-based development. In: Software Engineering, 2009. ICSE 2009. IEEE 31st international conference on. IEEE, pp 188–198

  • Gijsbers PJA, Moore RV, Tindall CI (2002) HarmonIT: towards OMI, an open modelling Interface and environment to harmonise European developments in water related simulation software. In: Falconer RA, Lin B, Harris EL, Wilson C, Cluckie ID, Han D, Davis JP, Heslop S (eds) Hydroinformatics 2002, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Cardiff. UK. IWA Publishing, London, pp 1628–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen JB, Gijsbers PJA, Westen SJP (2007) OpenMI: Open modelling interface. J Hydroinform 9(3):175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta T, Jones R, Bastin L, Cornford D (2012) Integrating OpenMI and UncertWeb: managing uncertainty in OpenMI models. In: Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankampa D (eds) Managing resources of a limited planet: pathways and visions under uncertainty, IEMSS Sixth International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, 1–5 July 2012, Leipzig. Germany. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Manno, pp 1151–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, Q. K., Cleverley, P. & Kelly, D. 2014. The Fluid Earth 2 implementation of OpenMI 2.0. J. Hydroinform. 16(4), 890–906.

  • Harpham QK, Cleverley P, Danovaro E, D’Agostino D, Galizia A, Delogu F, Fiori E (2015) Using a model MAP to prepare hydro-meteorological models for generic use. Environ Model Softw 73(C):260–271. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill C, DeLuca C, Balaji V, Suarez M, da Silva A (2004) The architecture of the earth system modeling framework. Comput Sci Eng 6:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO19115 (2003) ISO 19115:2003 Geographic information – metadata Accessed 2 May 2014Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26020

  • Johnston JM, McGarvey DJ, Barber MC, Laniak G, Babendreier J, Parmar R, Wolfe K, Kraemer SR, Cyterski M, Knightes C, Rashleigh B, Suarez L, Ambrose R (2011) An integrated modeling framework for performing environmental assessments: application to ecosystem services in the Albemarle-Pamlico basins (NC and VA, USA). Ecol Model 222:2471–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacsuk P (2010) Sharing Interoperable Workflows for large-scale scientific simulations on available DCIs http://www.shiwa-workflow.eu/project. Accessed 26 Mar 2013

  • NESC Website (2016) http://www.nesc.ac.uk/nesc/define.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2016

  • OGC NetCDF (2011) OGC Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) Core Encoding Standard version 1.0. Open Geospatial Consortium. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/netcdf. Accessed 2 May 2014

  • OGC OpenMI 2.0 (2014) OGC open modelling Interface (OpenMI) Interface standard. Open geospatial consortium Interface standard. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/openmi. Accessed 28 Aug 2014

  • OGC WaterML 2.0 (2012) OGC WaterML 2.0 Part 1 – Timeseries. Open Geospatial Consortium Implementation Standard. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/waterml. Accessed 2 May 2014

  • OGC Web Coverage Service (2012) OGC WCS 2.0 Interface Standard - Core, version 2.0.1. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wcs. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  • OGC Web Feature Service (2014) OGC Web Feature Service 2.0 Interface Standard version 2.0.2. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wfs. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  • Parodi A, Morando M, Rebora N, Trasforini E, Siccardi F, Craig GC, Tafferner A, Kranzlmuller D, Schiffers M, Clematis A, D’Agostino D, Galizia A, Quarati A (2011) DRIHMS: the white paper ISBN 978–88–906068-0-9. http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/projects/cnect/3/246703/080/deliverables/001-WhitePapersDrihms.pdf

  • Peckham S, Goodall J (2013) Driving plug-and-play models with data from web services: a demonstration of interoperability between CSDMS and CUAHSI-HIS. Comput Geosci 53:154–161. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham S, Hutton E, Norris D (2013) A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: the design of CSDMS. Comput Geosci 53:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procter R, Voss A, Asgari-Targhi M (2013) Fostering the human infrastructure of e-research. Information, Communication & Society 16(10):1668–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffers M, Kranzlmueller D, Clematis A, D'Agostino D, Galizia A, Quarati A, Parodi A, Rebora N, Morando M, Rebora N, Trasforini E, Molini L, Siccardi F, Craig GC, Tafferner A (2011) Towards a grid infrastructure for hydro-meteorological research computer science, 12, 45-62. ISSN:1508–2806

  • Sutherland J, Townend IH, Harpham QK, Pearce GR (2014) From integration to fusion: the challenges ahead. In: Riddick AT, Kessler H, Giles JRA (eds) Integrated environmental modelling to solve real world problems: methods, visions and challenges, special publications 408. Geological Society, London. doi:10.1144/SP408.6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG, Horsburgh JS, Maidment DR, Whiteaker T, Zaslavsky I, Piasecki M, Goodall J, Valentine D, Whitenack T (2009) Development of a community hydrologic information system. 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13–17 (July 2009) http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09

  • Weerts AH, Schellekens J, Weiland FS (2010) Real-time geospatial data handling and forecasting: examples from delft-FEWS forecasting platform/system. IEEE J Sel Top Appl 3(3):386–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteaker T, Cao Y, Castronova AM (2012) Using HydroDesktop to share hydrologic data and analyses. Proceedings of the AWRA Spring Specialty Conference on GIS and Water Resources, New Orleans, LA, March, In, pp 26–28 http://his.cuahsi.org/documents/TimWhiteaker_26686f68_7981.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project team would like to acknowledge the time taken by all respondents in providing their feedback to the consultation process and the permission given for summary results and supporting comments to be included in project outputs.

This research was co-funded by the European Commission (EC) 7th Framework Programme DRIHM2US Project, Grant Number 313122. The author would like to acknowledge the contributions of the European Commission and the project team, in particular, the group at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet, Muenchen for their production of the report “Report on an Assessment of Options for Organizational Setup” and the team at Deltares for leading the work package including this consultation.

The DRIHM2US project is paired with the SCIHM project in the USA, funded by the NSF. As such, the authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of our partner organisations from this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quillon Harpham.

Additional information

Responsible editor: H. A. Babaie

Highlights

• Exploration of the features of hydro-meteorological e-Science environments;

• Transatlantic comparison into stakeholder experiences;

• Assessment of show-stopping issues for hydro-meteorological e-Science environments;

• Consideration into potential structure of multi-domain research infrastructures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harpham, Q., Gimeno, O., Parodi, A. et al. A stakeholder consultation into hydro-meteorological e-science environments. Earth Sci Inform 10, 219–234 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0294-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0294-6

Keywords

Navigation