Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Role of Self-Confidence, Need-for-Cognition, and the Degree of IT Support on Individual Creativity: Multilevel Analysis Approach

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s creative economy, individuals generally have not been regarded as reservoirs of creativity who yield sustainable growth in hypercompetitive markets. Individuals rely on IT support to reduce clerical loads and enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of their work as well. When they work in teams, they also require self-confidence and the need for cognition to promote their individual creativity. Data were derived from the members of a large system integration company in South Korea (N = 256, 50 teams). As the study considered variables at both the team and individual levels, we adopted a multilevel analysis approach. We found that individual self-confidence, which indicates the degree of perceived possibility of success at a task, and the need for cognition, the intrinsic motivation to engage in and enjoy thinking, affected individual creativity significantly. Further, the degree of IT support, the team-level variable, had a significant effect on individual creativity. The degree of IT support did not have a significant effect on the relationship between self-confidence and individual creativity, but did have a moderating effect that weakened the relationship between the need for cognition and individual creativity. These findings have implications for theories of members’ creativity in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to" the social psychology of creativity.". Westview press

  • Arch, E. C. (1992). Sex differences in the effect of self-efficacy on willingness to participate in a performance situation. Psychological Reports, 70(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y., & Treacy, M. E. (1986). Information technology and corporate strategy: a research perspective. MIS Quarterly, 10(2), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In This chapter includes revised and expanded material presented as an invited address at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews, Scotland, Apr 1989.. Hemisphere Publishing Corp

  • Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (1986). Creativity is forever (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company

  • Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1982). Organizational context and MIS structure: some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1994). Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians. Motivation and Emotion, 18(4), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, B., & Vorderer, P. (2001). Psychological escapism: predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Processing goals, task interest, and the mood–performance relationship: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, G. P., & Hall, D. T. (2004). Self-confidence and leader performance. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1976). Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory. Stoelting Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., Wilson, F., Marlino, D., & Barbosa, S. D. (2008). Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass.

  • Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, J. A. (1999). The effect of gender role, attitude toward leadership, and self-confidence on leader emergence: implications for leadership development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(4), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwang, N. A., & Rodrigues, D. (2002). A big-five personality profile of the adaptor and innovator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 254–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1989). Handbook of creativity. In Personality, situation, and creativity (pp. 211–232). US: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (2008). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review Press.

  • O’Hara, L. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. (1989). A response to Longford and Plewis. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 1(3), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage

  • Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of American individual. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., & Kaplan, H. B. (Eds.) (1982). Social psychology and the self-concept. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (2009). Engineering the User Interface. In Creativity support tools: A grand challenge for HCI researchers (pp. 1–9). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, M., Mynatt, E. D., Nakakoji, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2004). Variation in element and action: supporting simultaneous development of alternative solutions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 711–718). ACM

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: the role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29(4), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, F. (1986). Why do men have higher expectancy than women? Sex Roles, 14(7–8), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, B., & Bruggen, G. H. (1998). Drivers of Success for Marketing Management Support Systems: Towards a Theory of Marketing Decision Support. Faculteit Bedrijfskunde/Rotterdam School of Management: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: implications for entrepreneurship Education1. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 165–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014S1A3A2038108).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SKK Business School, Creativity Science Research Institute (CSRI), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Republic of Korea

    Min Hee Hahn

  2. SKK Business School, SAIHST (Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology), Creativity Science Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Republic of Korea

    Kun Chang Lee

Authors
  1. Min Hee Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kun Chang Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun Chang Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Min Hee Hahn declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kun Chang Lee declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahn, M.H., Lee, K.C. Exploring the Role of Self-Confidence, Need-for-Cognition, and the Degree of IT Support on Individual Creativity: Multilevel Analysis Approach. Curr Psychol 36, 565–576 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9445-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9445-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation