Skip to main content
Log in

Developing of an English Version of the Aggressive Driving Behavior Test (AVIS). Improving the Construct Validity of Aggressive Driving

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research investigated the psychometric properties and the discriminant validity of the English version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Aggressive Driving Behavior (AVIS). Study 1 assessed the psychometric properties of the instrument. Internal consistency ranged from 0.77 to 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis did not support the original five factor structure, Instrumental Aggression and Acting Out being unified in a single factor. Following the confirmatory factor analysis a version with 26 items and 3 factors was obtained. Inter-scale correlations showed that the dimensions of the AVIS are inter-correlated. Study 2 verified the discriminant validity of the English version of the AVIS by testing the relationships between the AVIS dimensions and the DAX (Driving Anger Expression Inventory) dimensions. The results showed good discriminant validity, the dimensions of the two instruments being uncorrelated. In conclusion, the findings contribute to the development of the driving aggression construct by adding new dimensions to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnau- Sabates, L., Garcia, M. J., Munoz, M. M., & Capdevilla, J. M. (2013). The relationship between awareness of road safety programme. Journal of Risk Research, 16(5), 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. W., & Doverspike, D. (2001). Predicting motor vehicle crash involvement from a personality measure and a driving knowledge test. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 22(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Graziano, W. G. (1996). The Five -Factor Model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. Journal of Personality, 64, 593–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C. (2013). Personality and individual differences. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayuso, M., Guillen, M., & Alcaniz, M. (2010). The impact of traffic violations on the estimated cost of traffic accidents with victims. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 42, 709–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benesch, M. (2011). Manual: Aggressive driving behavior-test label AVIS, Vienna Test System.

  • Benfield, A. J., Szlemko, J. W., & Bell, P. A. (2007). Driver personality and anthropomorphic attributions of vehicle personality relate reported aggressive driving tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandau, H., Daghofer, F., Hofmann, M., & Spitzer, P. (2011). Personality subtypes of young moped drivers, their relationship of risk-taking behavior and involvement in road crashes in an Austrian sample. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(5), 1713–1722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS—basic concepts, applications, and programming. New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 903–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen, E. R., Edwards, B. D., Tubre, T., Zyphur, M. J., & Warren, C. R. (2012). Taking a look behind the wheel: an investigation into the personality predictors of aggressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Deffenbacher, D. M., & Oetting, E. R. (2001). Further evidence of reliability and validity for the Driving Anger Expression Inventory. Psychological Reports, 89(3), 535–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Swaim, R. C. (2002). The driving anger expression inventory: a measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 717–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Road Safety evolution in EU. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/index_en.htm.

  • Fergusson, D., Swain-Campbell, & Horwood, J. (2002). Risky driving behaviour in young people: prevalence, personal characteristics and traffic accidents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greitemeyer, T. (2012). Exposure to media with prosocial content reduces the propensity for reckless and risky driving. Journal of Risk Research, 16(5), 583–594.

  • Harris, P. B., & Houston, J. M. (2010). Recklessness in context: individual and situational correlates to aggressive driving. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). Der Fragebogen zur Erfassung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen im Straßenverkehr (AViS) [The questionnaire for the assessment of aggressive driving behavior (Avis)]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2009). Beyond “accident-proneness”: using Five-Factor Model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and technique for estimating the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2011). Introduction to research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, D., Lipovac, K., Stanojevic, P., & Stanojevic, D. (2011). The effects of personality traits on driving-related anger and aggressive driving behavior among Serbian drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 14, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. S., Myeong, M. H., & Kweon, Y. J. (2011). Differences in traffic violations and at-fault crashes between license suspension and revocation. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 42, 755–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Y., & Parker, D. (2008). Driving violations, aggression and perceived consensus. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 58, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahe, B., & Fenske, I. (2002). Predicting aggressive driving behavior: the role of macho personality, age, and power of car. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajunen, T., Parker, D., & Stradling, S. G. (1998). Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation. Transportation Research Part F, 1, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, R. (1979). Role of primary personality factors in the perception of traffic signs and driver violations and accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 11(2), 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucidi, F., Giannini, A. M., Sgalla, R., Mallia, L., Devoto, A., & Reichmann. (2010). Young novice, driver subtypes: relationship to driving violations, errors and lapses. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1689–1696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo, D., Settanni, M., & Vidotto, G. (2012). Drivers’ subtypes in a sample of Italian adolescents: relation between personality measures and driving behaviors. Transportation Research Part F, 15, 480–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Dorn, L., & Glendon, I. (1991). Personality correlates of driver stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(6), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesken, J., Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (2002). Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation to accident involvement in Finland. Ergonomics, 45(7), 469–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender-role on aggressive driving, traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E., & Pedhazur-Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, W., & Anderle, F. G. (2000). Venturesomeness and extraversion as correlates of juvenile drivers traffic violations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 673–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, T., & Eldror, E. (2013). Vehicle impoundment regulations as a means for reducing traffic-violations and road accident in Israel. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 50, 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, R. A., Leung, J. S., & Wiederman, M. W. (2012). Driving citations and aggressive behavior. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13(3), 337–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhfreid, G. (2011). Handbook of the tests. Vienna test systems. www.schuhfried.at.

  • Schwerdtfeger, A., Heims, R., & Heer, J. (2010). Digit ratio (2D:4D) is associated with traffic violations for male frequent car drivers. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 42, 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. I., & Kirkham, R. W. (1981). Relationship between some personality characteristics and driving record. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 229–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumer, N. (2003). Personality and behavioral predictors of traffic accidents: testing a contextual mediated model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(6), 949–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, W. A., & Hobbs, G. E. (1949). The accident-prone automobile driver a study of the psychiatric and social background. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 106, 321–331.

  • World Health Organization. (2009). European status report on road safety: towards safer roads and healthier transport choices. Retrieved April 29, 2014, from, http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/index_en.htm.

  • Zhang, G., Yau, K. K. W., & Chen, G. (2013). Risk factors associated with traffic violations and accident severity in China. Accidents Analysis and Prevention, 59, 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vlad Burtăverde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chraif, M., Dumitru, D., Aniţei, M. et al. Developing of an English Version of the Aggressive Driving Behavior Test (AVIS). Improving the Construct Validity of Aggressive Driving. Curr Psychol 35, 29–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9353-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9353-7

Keywords

Navigation