Skip to main content
Log in

Short Term Effects of Gossip Behavior on Self-Esteem

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gossip is a frequent social activity, yet there is little research on the experience of providing gossip and how it impacts upon well-being of the gossiper. The present research aimed to investigate the effect of gossip behavior on the self-esteem of the gossiper. In Study 1, 140 participants were asked to write either a positive or negative description of a target person. Self-esteem was significantly reduced after providing a negative description but there was no effect of providing a positive one. In Study 2, 112 participants were asked to share information about someone they knew. Self-esteem decreased significantly regardless of the valence of the information. This research suggests that the act of gossiping is one which leads to self‐criticism regardless of valence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkow, J. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 627–637). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111–121. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, H. H. (1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 157–162. doi:10.1037/h0033027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1983). Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8, 231–246. doi:10.1007/BF02912493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 5, 185–201. doi:10.1080/13594329608414854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 171–193. doi:10.1080/14792779108401861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, M., & Leimar, O. (1993). The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms. Animal Behavior, 45, 747–757. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, S. D. (2011). Is gossip power? The inverse relationships between gossip, power, and likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 574–579. doi:10.1002/ejsp.821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, S. D., Timme, D. R., & Hart, J. (2010). On coffee talk and break-room chatter: perceptions of women who gossip in the workplace. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 361–368. doi:10.1080/00224540903365430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A., & Rosnow, R. L. (1978). Gossip, gossipers, gossiping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 161–168. doi:10.1177/014616727800400135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8, 78–99. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, T. (2001). Politness. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 341–355). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, M. E., Skleder, A. A., Rind, B., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Gossip, gossipers and gossipees. In A. Ben-Ze’ev & R. Goodman (Eds.), Good gossip. Lawrence: Press of the University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., & Holliday, H. (1995). Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Personal Relationships, 2, 237–246. doi:10.1007/BF01954575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka, M., Czapinksi, J., & Peeters, G. (1992). Positive–negative asymmetry or ‘When the heart needs a reason’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 425–434. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The black sheep effect: extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, L. E., Berry, J. W., & Weiss, J. (1999). Interpersonal guilt, shame, and psychological problems. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 181–203. doi:10.1521/jscp.1999.18.2.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2007). From social talk to social action: shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 780–797. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton. University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, R. B. (1956). Some psychological mechanisms operative in gossip. Social Forces, 34, 262–267. doi:10.2307/2574050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (1994). Gossip as moral talk. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze-ev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 34–47). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. M., Mazur, M. A., Wendel, N., & Wilmslow, R. (2003). Relational ruin or social glue? The joint effect of relationship type and gossip valence on liking, trust, and expertise. Communication Monographs, 70, 129–141. doi:10.1080/0363775032000133782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, A., & Oner-Ozkan, B. (2007). A self-presentational approach to transmission of good and bad news. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 63–78. doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Wilczynski, C., Wells, A., & Weiser, L. (2002). Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), The evolution of cognition (pp. 347–365). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkovich, S. (1977). Gossip as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, 26, 192–196. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01817.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, J.M., Scrivener, H. Short Term Effects of Gossip Behavior on Self-Esteem. Curr Psychol 32, 252–260 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9176-3

Keywords

Navigation