Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotion and the Ultimate Attribution Error

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of specific emotions (fear and anger) on the ultimate attribution error was investigated. Participants were recruited from an undergraduate population. There were 420 participants (156 male) with a mean age of 19.26 years. Participants took part in an online study. The study identified participants’ political in-groups (Democrat or Republican), induced them to feel an emotion (fear, anger, or neutral), and asked them to make an attribution (dispositional or circumstantial control) for the good or bad behaviors of Democratic or Republican politicians. Results revealed an ultimate attribution error (participants made in-group favoring/out-group derogating attributions), and an influence of emotion over the pattern of attributions made within this attribution error. The hypothesis that the valence of emotions influences attributions within the ultimate attribution error was supported. No support was found for the hypothesis that appraisal dimensions of emotions influence attributions within the ultimate attribution error. Theoretical implications and future directions were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgardner, A. H., & Arkin, R. M. (1988). Affective state mediates causal attributions for success and failure. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. D. (2011). Emotion and the self-serving bias. Current Psychology, 30, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Record (2011). http://www.gpoaccess.gov/crecord/index.html.

  • Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & Locke, J. (2005). Affective influences on causal inferences: the effects of mood on attributions for positive and negative interpersonal episodes. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1071–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on the intergroup causal atrributuion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M., & Ward, C. (1985). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in Southeast Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: an appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740–752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. S., & Liu, H. (2008). Intergroup attributions and ethnocentrism in the Indian subcontinent: the ultimate attribution error revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Han, S., & Keltner, D. (2007). Feelings and consumer decision making: extending the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 184–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Lowenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 123–126). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions: Empirical tests, mental models, and implications for social interaction. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1977). International conflict and the problem of attribution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 75–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 10 (pp. 173–220). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & Huse, P. (1977). The ‘false consensus effect’: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58105, USA

    Martin D. Coleman

Authors
  1. Martin D. Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin D. Coleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, M.D. Emotion and the Ultimate Attribution Error. Curr Psychol 32, 71–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9164-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9164-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation