Abstract
After giving a brief account of human rights, the paper investigates five contemporary attacks on them. All of the attacks come from two contemporary proponents of the cost-benefit state, attorney Cass Sunstein and philosopher Larry Laudan. These attacks may be called, respectively, the rationality, objectivity, permission, voluntariness, and comparativism claims. Laudan's and Sunstein's rationality claim (RC) ist that only policy decisions passing cost-benefit tests are rational. Their objectivity presupposition (OP) is that only acute, deterministic threats to life are objective. Sunstein’s permission claim (PC) is that regulators are merely permitted, 3 not required, to take distributive and human rights concerns into account. Sunstein’s 3 voluntariness claim (VC) is that the consent of potential victims is not relevant to government regulations about risks and benefits. Laudan’s comparativism claim 3 (CC) is that there are no rules of thumb, no precomparative norms like human rights, for assessing theory choice in policy science. The paper analyzes each of these claims, shows how they undercut human rights, and argues that each of them errs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allchin, Douglas. 1994. The super bowl and the Ox-Phos controversy: Winner-take-all competition in philosophy of science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1:22–33.
ACS. 2002. Cancer facts and figures 2002. Washington, DC: American Cancer Society.
ACS. 2000. Cancer facts and figures, 2000. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
Austin, Wendy. 2001. Using the human-rights paradigm in health ethics. Nursing ethics 8: 183–195.
Buchanan, Allen. 2000. Rawls's Law of Peoples. Ethics 110: 697–721.
Bureau of the Census. 1994. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
Caplan, R. 1990. Our earth, our selves. New York: Bantam, 1990.
Care, Norman. 1978. Participation and policy. Ethics 88: 316–337.
Centers for Disease Control. 2000. Statistical Rolodex-Cancer. US Government: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/cancer.htm. 0
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dwyer, Deirdre. 2003. “Beyond autonomy,” Oxford journal of legal studies 23: 319–331.
Epstein, Samuel. 1998. The politics of cancer revisited. Fremont Center, NY: East Ridge Press.
Etzioni, Amitai. 1997. Cross-cultural judgments. Journal of social philosophy 28: 5–15.
Feinberg, Joel. 1992. Freedom and fulfillment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1980. “The nature and value of rights,” in Rights, justice, and the bounds of liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 143–155.
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2003. “Two notions of humanity and the judgment argument for human rights.” Political theory 31: 392–420.
John Gofman. 1990. Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure. Berkeley, CA: Committee for Nuclear Responsibility.
Greenlee, Robert, and Taylor Murray. 2000. Cancer statistics, 2000, Cancer journal 6: 7–11.
Gundersen, Adolph. 1994. Research traditions and the evolution of cold war nuclear strategy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24: 291–319.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Erlautungen zur diskrusethik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hogan, Nancy. 1994. Shielded from liability, ABA Journal 80: 56–60.
Ingram, David. 2003. Between political liberalism and postnational cosmopolitanism. Political theory 31: 359–391.
Johns L. S. Johns, et al., OTA Solar Energy Staff. 1987. Application of Solar Technology to Today's Energy Needs. 2 vols. Washington, DC: US Office of Technology Assessment.
Miller, x. 2000. Living in the environment.
Kant, Immanuel. 1972. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, trans. H.J. Paton, London: Hutchinson, esp. sec. 2.
Lashof, J.C., et al., Health and Life Sciences Division of the US Office of Technology Assessment. 1981. Assessment of Technologies for Determining Cancer Risks from the Environment. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
Laudan, Larry. 1997. Danger anead. New York: Wiley.
Laudan, Larry. 1997a. How about bust? Factoring explanatory power back into theory. Philosophy of Science 64: 306–316.
Laudan, Larry. 1994. The book of risks. New York: Wiley, 1994.
Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leigh, J. Paul. 1995. Causes of death in the workplace. London: Quorum Books.
Leslie, John. 1998. The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. New York: Routledge.
Lilienfeld, Abraham, Morton L. Levin, and Irving I. Kessler. 1992. Cancer in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Luban, David. 2002. The war on terrorism and the end of human rights. Philosophy and public policy quarterly 22: 9–14.
Mitka, Mike. 2002. Disparity in cancer statistics changing,” Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 703–704.
NCI. 2000. Cancer rates and risks. US Government: US National Institutes of Health and US National Cancer Institute http://rex.nci.nih.gov/NCI Pub Interface/rasterisk/. 0
NCI. 1994. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994. Bethesda, MD: NCI.
National Institute of Health. 1987. Annual Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
National Research Council. 1996. Understanding risk in a democracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1996a. Carcinogens and anticarcinogens in the human diet. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2003. Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. NY: Oxford University Press.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2002. Natural rights and human vulnerability, Public affairs quarterly 16: 99–124.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2001. “MacIntyre on human rights,” Modern schoolman LXXIX: 1–21.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 1993. Burying uncertainty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 1991. Risk and rationality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Risk and reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
US Congress. 1994a. Cold War Human Subject Experimentation, Hearing before the Legislation and National Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, second session, 28 Sept., 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
US Congress. 1994b. Human Subjects Research: Radiation Experimentation, Hearings before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources. United States Senate, One Hundred and Third Congress, first session, 13 January, 1994. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
US Congress. 1986. American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on US Citizens, A report prepared by the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
US Department of Energy. 1995. Human Radiation Experiments: The Department of Energy Roadmap to the Story and the Records. Springfied, VA: National Technical Information Service, DOE/EH-0445.
US DOE. 1987. Health and Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident, DOE/ER-0332. Washington, DC: US DOE.
Woolam, Gerald L. 2000. A benchmark for the new century,” Cancer journal 6:6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shrader-Frechette, K. Flawed attacks on contemporary human rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the cost-benefit state. Hum Rights Rev 7, 92–110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1004-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1004-1