Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flawed attacks on contemporary human rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the cost-benefit state

  • Articles
  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After giving a brief account of human rights, the paper investigates five contemporary attacks on them. All of the attacks come from two contemporary proponents of the cost-benefit state, attorney Cass Sunstein and philosopher Larry Laudan. These attacks may be called, respectively, the rationality, objectivity, permission, voluntariness, and comparativism claims. Laudan's and Sunstein's rationality claim (RC) ist that only policy decisions passing cost-benefit tests are rational. Their objectivity presupposition (OP) is that only acute, deterministic threats to life are objective. Sunstein’s permission claim (PC) is that regulators are merely permitted, 3 not required, to take distributive and human rights concerns into account. Sunstein’s 3 voluntariness claim (VC) is that the consent of potential victims is not relevant to government regulations about risks and benefits. Laudan’s comparativism claim 3 (CC) is that there are no rules of thumb, no precomparative norms like human rights, for assessing theory choice in policy science. The paper analyzes each of these claims, shows how they undercut human rights, and argues that each of them errs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allchin, Douglas. 1994. The super bowl and the Ox-Phos controversy: Winner-take-all competition in philosophy of science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1:22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACS. 2002. Cancer facts and figures 2002. Washington, DC: American Cancer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACS. 2000. Cancer facts and figures, 2000. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Wendy. 2001. Using the human-rights paradigm in health ethics. Nursing ethics 8: 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen. 2000. Rawls's Law of Peoples. Ethics 110: 697–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census. 1994. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. 1990. Our earth, our selves. New York: Bantam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care, Norman. 1978. Participation and policy. Ethics 88: 316–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control. 2000. Statistical Rolodex-Cancer. US Government: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/cancer.htm. 0

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Deirdre. 2003. “Beyond autonomy,” Oxford journal of legal studies 23: 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Samuel. 1998. The politics of cancer revisited. Fremont Center, NY: East Ridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1997. Cross-cultural judgments. Journal of social philosophy 28: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1992. Freedom and fulfillment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1980. “The nature and value of rights,” in Rights, justice, and the bounds of liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Alessandro. 2003. “Two notions of humanity and the judgment argument for human rights.” Political theory 31: 392–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John Gofman. 1990. Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure. Berkeley, CA: Committee for Nuclear Responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee, Robert, and Taylor Murray. 2000. Cancer statistics, 2000, Cancer journal 6: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, Adolph. 1994. Research traditions and the evolution of cold war nuclear strategy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24: 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Erlautungen zur diskrusethik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Nancy. 1994. Shielded from liability, ABA Journal 80: 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, David. 2003. Between political liberalism and postnational cosmopolitanism. Political theory 31: 359–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns L. S. Johns, et al., OTA Solar Energy Staff. 1987. Application of Solar Technology to Today's Energy Needs. 2 vols. Washington, DC: US Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, x. 2000. Living in the environment.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1972. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, trans. H.J. Paton, London: Hutchinson, esp. sec. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashof, J.C., et al., Health and Life Sciences Division of the US Office of Technology Assessment. 1981. Assessment of Technologies for Determining Cancer Risks from the Environment. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 1997. Danger anead. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 1997a. How about bust? Factoring explanatory power back into theory. Philosophy of Science 64: 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 1994. The book of risks. New York: Wiley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, J. Paul. 1995. Causes of death in the workplace. London: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John. 1998. The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, Abraham, Morton L. Levin, and Irving I. Kessler. 1992. Cancer in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luban, David. 2002. The war on terrorism and the end of human rights. Philosophy and public policy quarterly 22: 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitka, Mike. 2002. Disparity in cancer statistics changing,” Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 703–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCI. 2000. Cancer rates and risks. US Government: US National Institutes of Health and US National Cancer Institute http://rex.nci.nih.gov/NCI Pub Interface/rasterisk/. 0

    Google Scholar 

  • NCI. 1994. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994. Bethesda, MD: NCI.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health. 1987. Annual Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1996. Understanding risk in a democracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1996a. Carcinogens and anticarcinogens in the human diet. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2003. Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2002. Natural rights and human vulnerability, Public affairs quarterly 16: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 2001. “MacIntyre on human rights,” Modern schoolman LXXIX: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 1993. Burying uncertainty. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 1991. Risk and rationality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass. 2002. Risk and reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress. 1994a. Cold War Human Subject Experimentation, Hearing before the Legislation and National Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, second session, 28 Sept., 1994. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress. 1994b. Human Subjects Research: Radiation Experimentation, Hearings before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources. United States Senate, One Hundred and Third Congress, first session, 13 January, 1994. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress. 1986. American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on US Citizens, A report prepared by the Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, US House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy. 1995. Human Radiation Experiments: The Department of Energy Roadmap to the Story and the Records. Springfied, VA: National Technical Information Service, DOE/EH-0445.

    Google Scholar 

  • US DOE. 1987. Health and Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident, DOE/ER-0332. Washington, DC: US DOE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolam, Gerald L. 2000. A benchmark for the new century,” Cancer journal 6:6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrader-Frechette, K. Flawed attacks on contemporary human rights: Laudan, Sunstein, and the cost-benefit state. Hum Rights Rev 7, 92–110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1004-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-005-1004-1

Keywords

Navigation