The End of Moral Realism?
- Steven Ross
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The author considers how constructivism, presently known to us essentially as a theory for generating rules of social cooperation, embodies a certain conception of justification that in turn may be thought of as a general theory. It is argued that moral realism and projectivism are by turns platitudinous and unsatisfactory as conceptions of justification; by contrast the general conception of justification in constructivism makes sense of reason giving and coherent rivalry. The author argues that once the right picture of justification is in place, the picture constructivism illustrates or embodies, the problem of moral ontology disappears.
- Blackburn, S. (1988). How to be an ethical anti-realist” for this claim, and for the argument that it is a central feature of projectivism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 12, 361–375. CrossRef
- Milo, R. (1995). Contractarian constructivism. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(4), 181–204. CrossRef
- Railton, P. (1986). Moral realism. Philosophical Review, 95, 163–207. CrossRef
- Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 515–572. CrossRef
- The End of Moral Realism?
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 43-61
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Justification theory
- Moral realism
- Steven Ross (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York and Hunter College/CUNY, 369 Seventh Ave. #3, New York, NY, 10001, USA