Skip to main content
Log in

‘Neptune’ between ‘Hesperus’ and ‘Vulcan’: On descriptive names and non-existence

  • Varia
  • Published:
Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work will focus on some aspects of descriptive names. The New Theory of Reference, in line with Kripke, takes descriptive names to be proper names. I will argue in this paper that descriptive names and certain theory in reference to them, even when it disagrees with the New Theory of Reference, can shed light on our understanding of (some) non-existence statements. I define the concept of descriptive name for hypothesised object (DNHO). My thesis being that DNHOs are, as I will specify, descriptions: a proposition expressed by the utterance ‘n is F’, where ‘n’ is a DNHO, is not singular at all; it is a descriptive proposition. To sum up, concerning proper names, the truth lies closer to the New Theory of Reference, but descriptivism is not altogether false. As for DNHOs descriptivism is, in some cases, the right fit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun, D. (forthcoming): “Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names”, Noûs.

  • Caplan, B. 2004: “Creatures of Fiction, Myth and Imagination”, American Philosophical Quarterly 41(4).

  • Donnellan, K. S. 1966: “Reference and Definite Descriptions”, reprinted in: S. P. Schwartz, ed., 1977, Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, A. 2000: “Referentialism and Empty Names”, in: A. Everett & Th. Hofweber, eds., 2000, Empty names, Fictions and the puzzles of Non-Existence, Stanford: CSLI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. 1980: Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. 1988: “Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference”, Noûs 22, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. 1993: Direct Reference, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N. 1998: “Nonexistence”, Noûs 32, pp. 277–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. 2002: Beyond Rigidity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. 2003: The Age of Meaning, Princeton University Press.

  • Wettstein, H. 1986: “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?”, The Journal of Philosophy LXXXIII(4), pp. 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work has been supported by the research project 1/UPV 00003.230-H-14780/2002 of the University of the Basque Country.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urtizberea, A.A. ‘Neptune’ between ‘Hesperus’ and ‘Vulcan’: On descriptive names and non-existence. Acta Anal 20, 48–58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-005-1029-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-005-1029-8

Keywords

Navigation