Acta Analytica

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 43–69

An analysis of the a priori and a posteriori

  • Jeremy Fantl
Epistemology

DOI: 10.1007/s12136-003-1014-z

Cite this article as:
Fantl, J. Acta Anal (2003) 18: 43. doi:10.1007/s12136-003-1014-z
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

I present and defend a unified, non-reductive analysis of the a priori and a posteriori. It is a mistake to remove all epistemic conditions from the analysis of the a priori (as, for example, Alvin Goldman has recently suggested doing). We can keep epistemic conditions (like unrevisability) in the analysis as long as we insist that a priori and a posteriori justification admit of degrees. I recommend making the degree to which a belief’s justification is a priori or a posteriori solely dependent on the revisability relations that obtain among the faculties that deliver the belief and all other faculties.

Keywords

a prioria posterioriunrevisabilityfacultiesjustificationrationalism

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Fantl
    • 1
  1. 1.Expository WritingHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA