An analysis of the a priori and a posteriori
- Jeremy Fantl
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
I present and defend a unified, non-reductive analysis of the a priori and a posteriori. It is a mistake to remove all epistemic conditions from the analysis of the a priori (as, for example, Alvin Goldman has recently suggested doing). We can keep epistemic conditions (like unrevisability) in the analysis as long as we insist that a priori and a posteriori justification admit of degrees. I recommend making the degree to which a belief’s justification is a priori or a posteriori solely dependent on the revisability relations that obtain among the faculties that deliver the belief and all other faculties.
- Aristotle. 1941. De Anima. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by R. McKeon. New York City: Random House, Inc.: pp. 533–603.
- Boghossian, Paul Artin. 1997. Analyticity. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, edited by B. Hale, Wright, Crispin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: pp. 331–368.
- BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- ——. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Casullo, Albert. 1988. Revisability, Reliabilism, and A Priori Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49:187–213. CrossRef
- Edidin, Aron. 1984. A Priori Knowledge for Fallibilists. Philosophical Studies 46:189–197. CrossRef
- Field, Hartry. 1996. The A Prioricity of Logic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:359–379.
- ——. 2000. Apriority as an Evaluative Notion. In New Essays on the A Priori, edited by P. Boghossian and C. Peacocke. Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp. 117–149. CrossRef
- Foley, Richard. 1994. Quine and Naturalized Epistemology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19:243–260.
- Goldman, Alvin. 2000. A Priori Warrant and Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives 13.
- Hatfield, Gary. 1998. The Cognitive Faculties. In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy, edited by H. Sluga and D. G. Stern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp. 953–1002.
- Katz, Jerrold. 1994. What Mathematical Knowledge Could Be. Mind 104:491–522. CrossRef
- Lemos, Noah. 1997. Common Sense and A Priori Epistemology. The Monist 81:473–87.
- Putnam, Hilary. 1983. There is at least one a priori truth. In Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp. 98–114.
- Quine, W. V. O. 1980. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: pp. 20–46.
- Reid, Thomas. 1969. Essay Six. In Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press: pp.
- Sober, Elliott. 1981. Revisability, A Priori Truth, and Evolution. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59:68–85. CrossRef
- Sosa, Ernest. 1991a. Intellectual virtue in perspective. In Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp. 270–293.
- ——. 1991b. Knowledge and Intellectual Virtue. In Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp. 225–244.
- Summerfield, Donna. 1990. Modest A Priori Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51:39–66. CrossRef
- An analysis of the a priori and a posteriori
Volume 18, Issue 30-31 , pp 43-69
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- a priori
- a posteriori
- Jeremy Fantl (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Expository Writing, Harvard University, 8 Prescott Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA