Abstract
Immigrant students are commonly assumed lower performers in US schools. Their inadequate English language skills and adaptation to the mainstream US school norms are often seen as obstacles to their successful school learning. However, whether and to what extent this assumption is sustainable for immigrant students' performances in mathematics is the question that has not been empirically explored. Proper answer to the question would help verify the popular assumption about the immigrant students and their learning in the mainstream US schools. Guided by the straight-line, segmented assimilation and cultural capital theories, this study examined this issue using US grades 4 and 8 datasets of Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study 2007 and 15-year-old dataset of Program for International Student Assessment 2009. It was found that there were substantial differences in the mathematics performances of students across different racial groups. Being immigrant students does not always mean they are lower performers than their mainstream peers. The immigrant students coming to the USA earlier did not always show worse mathematics performance over their immigrant peers who came to the USA later. These findings challenge the popular assumption that immigrant students' inadequate English language skills and adaptation to the mainstream US school norms are obstacles to their successful school learning and call for a deeper understanding about the academic performance of immigrant students in different content areas and at various stages of immigration across different racial groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldous, J. (2006). Family, ethnicity, and immigrant youths' educational achievements. Journal of Family Issues, 27(12), 1633–1667.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control: theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (vol. 1). Boston: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relations to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passerson, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bracey, G. W. (1999). The demise of the Asian math gene. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(8), 619–620.
Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66(4), 1215–1234.
Cheung, S. Y., & Andersen, R. (2003). Time to read: family resources and educational outcomes in Britain. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34(3), 413–433.
Crane, E. W., Barrat, V. X., & Huang, M. (2011). The relationship between English proficiency and content knowledge for English language learner students in grades 10 and 11 in Utah. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., Shelley, B. E., & Xie, H. (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: performance of US 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Foy, P., & Olson, J. F. (2009). TIMSS 2007 user guide for the international database. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Fritzberg, G. J. (2004). No child left behind: changes and challenges. Journal of Education, 184(3), 37–43.
Gans, H. J. (1992). Comment: ethnic invention and acculturation, a bumpy-line approach. Journal of American Ethnic History, 11(1), 42–52.
García, E., Arias, M. B., Murri, N. J. H., & Serna, C. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: a challenge for a demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 132–142.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heath, A. F., Halsey, A. H., & Ridge, J. M. (1982). Cultural capital and political arithmetic: a response to the review symposium on origins and destinations. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1), 87–92.
Hess, F. M. (2006). Accountability without angst? Public opinion and No Child Left Behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 587–610.
Hess, F. M., & Petrilli, M. J. (2004). The politics of No Child Left Behind: will the coalition hold? Journal of Education, 185(3), 13–25.
Hopstock, P. & Pelczar, M. (2011). Technical report and user's guide for the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): 2009 data files and database with U.S. specific variables (NCES 2011-025). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
Hurh, W. M. (1990). The “1.5 generation”: a paragon of Korean–American pluralism. Korean Culture, 11(1), 21–31.
IBM. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (version 18). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
IEA. (2009). International database analyzer (version 2.0). Hamburg: IEA Data Processing and Research Center.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: the educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19.
Kao, G., Tienda, M., & Schneider, B. (1996). Racial and ethnic variation in educational outcomes. In A. M. Pallas (Ed.), Research in sociology of education and socialization (Vol. 11, pp. 263–297). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Kaufman, P., Chavez, L., Lauen, D., & Carroll, C. D. (1998). Generational status and educational outcomes among Asian and Hispanic 1988 eighth graders (National Center for Education Statistics, 1999-020). Washington: US Department of Education.
Kim, B. K., Brenner, B., Liang, C. T. H., & Asay, P. A. (2003). A qualitative study of adaptation experiences of 1.5-generation Asian Americans. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(2), 156–170.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lee, S. J. (2001). More than “model minorities” or “delinquents”: a look at Hmong American high school students. Harvard Education Review, 71(3), 505–528.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2005a). IEA's TIMSS 2003 International on achievement in the mathematics cognitive domains. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O'Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005b). TIMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (1997). Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_1997standards/.
Ogbu, J. U. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: a problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 312–334.
Ogbu, J. U. (1991). Minority coping responses and school experience. Journal of Psychohistory, 18(4), 433–456.
Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Problem solving for tomorrow's world: first measures of cross-curricular competencies from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). PISA 2006: science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 assessment framework—key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD.
Park, R. E. (1914). Racial assimilation in secondary groups. The American Journal of Sociology, 19(5), 606–623.
Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96.
Romberg, T. A. (1997). The influence of programs from other countries on the school mathematics reform curricula in the United States. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 127–147.
Rong, X. L. (1988). Immigration and Education in the United States, 1890–1980. (unpublished dissertation). Educational Research Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens.
Rong, X. L., & Grant, L. (1992). Ethnicity, immigrant generation status, and school attainment of Asians, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. The Sociological Quarterly, 33(4), 625–636.
Sakamoto, A., & Xie, Y. (2006). The socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. In P. G. Min (Ed.), Asian Americans: contemporary trends and issues (pp. 54–77). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Sassler, S. L. (2006). School participation among immigrant youths: the case of segmented assimilation in the early 20th century. Sociology of Education, 79(1), 1–24.
Sato, E., Rabinowitz, S., Gallagher, C., & Huang, C. W. (2010). Accommodations for English language learner students: the effect of linguistic modification of math test item sets (NCEE 2009-4079). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
Sawchuk, S. (2010). Two state unions balking at “Race to Top” plans. Education Week, 29(16), 1.
Schleicher, A. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: a comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Intercultural Education, 17(5), 507–516.
Smith-Davis, J. (2004). The world of immigrant students. Principal Leadership, 4(7), 44–49.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S. Y., Chen, C., Stigler, J. W., Hsu, C., & Kitamura, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement: a study of American, Chinese and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55(1–2), i–iii. vi, 1–119.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on US and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 3–13.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: how working-class kids get working-class jobs. New York: Colombia University Press.
Zhang, Y. (2003). Immigrant generational differences in academic achievement: the case of Asian American high school students. In C. C. Park, A. L. Goodwin, & S. J. Lee (Eds.), Asian American identity, families, and schooling (pp. 201–224). Greenwich: Information Age.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, Q., Wang, J., Hao, S. et al. Mathematics Performance of Immigrant Students Across Different Racial Groups: An Indirect Examination of the Influence of Culture and Schooling. Int. Migration & Integration 15, 589–607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-013-0300-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-013-0300-x