Does a Parsimony Principle Entail a Simple World?
- Craig DeLancey
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Many scholars claim that a parsimony principle has ontological implications. The most common such claim is that a parsimony principle entails that the “world” is simple. This ontological claim appears to often be coupled with the assumption that a parsimony principle would be corroborated if the “world” were simple. I clarify these claims, describe some minimal features of simplicity, and then show that both these claims are either false or they depend upon an implausible notion of simplicity. In their stead, I propose a minimal ontological claim: a parsimony principle entails a minimal realism about the existence of objects and laws, in order to allow that the descriptions of the relevant phenomena contain patterns.
- Chaitin, Gregory (1998) The Limits of Mathematics. London: Springer.
- Cohen, I. Bernard and Anne Whitman, translators (1999) The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Isaac Newton. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Grunbaum, Adolf (2008) “Is Simplicity Evidence of Truth?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 45 (2): 179–189.
- Harré, Rom (1965) The Anticipation of Nature. London: Hutchinson.
- Kelly, Kevin (2007) “A New Solution to the Puzzle of Simplicity.” Philosophy of Science, 74: 561–573. CrossRef
- Li, Ming and Paul Vitanyi (2008) An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications. New York: Springer. CrossRef
- Longino, Helen E. (1997) “Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology.” Proceedings of the Aristotlean Society, Supplementary Volumes. Volume 71: 19–54.
- ----- (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press.
- Popper, Karl (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
- Psillos, Stathis (2007) Philosophy of Science A-Z. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (2004) “On Simple Theories of a Complex World.” In Quintessence, Roger F. Gibson, Jr., editor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 210–213.
- Rescher, Nicholas (2003) Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany: SUNY.
- Rissanen, J. J. (1978) “Modeling by the Shortest Data Description.” Automatica, 15: 465–471. CrossRef
- ----- (1989) Stochastical Complexity and Statistical Inquiry. New York: World Scientific.
- Russell, Bertrand (2008) The Analysis of Mind. New York: NuVision.
- Sartre, Jean-Paul (1956) Being and Nothingness. Hazel Barnes, translator. New York: Washington Square Press.
- Schlick, Moritz (1979 ) “The Philosophical Significance of Relativity.” In Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers, Volume I (1909–1922). Henk L. Mulder and Barbara F. B. Van de Velde-Schlick (eds.), Peter Heath (translator). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
- Simon, Herbert A. (2001) “Science seeks Parsimony, Not Simplicity: Searching for Pattern in Phenomena.” In Simplicity, Inference and Modelling, Arnold Zellner, Hugo Keuzenkamp, and Michael McAleer (eds.): 32–72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Sober, Elliot (1975) Simplicity. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Solomonoff, R. J. (1964) “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference, Part 1 and Part 2.” Information and Control, 7: 1–22, 224–254. CrossRef
- Swinburne, Richard (1997) Simplicity as Evidence of Truth. The Aquinas Lecture, 1997. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
- Does a Parsimony Principle Entail a Simple World?
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 87-100
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Craig DeLancey (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, State University of New York at Oswego, Campus Center 212, Oswego, NY, 13126, USA