Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Putting Spatial Resilience into Practice

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing awareness of the need to develop the resilience of settlements to potential risks and hazards. There are numerous definitions of resilience reflecting diverse applications of the concept in different disciplines. These conceptualisations include the ability to ‘spring back’ after being stressed and the ability of a social-ecological system to maintain its functions by absorbing or adapting to change despite stresses and pressures placed on it. Although initially research was focussed on ecosystems, the resilience of socio-ecological systems is now receiving attention. The South African Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act includes ‘spatial resilience’ among the five principles intended to promote more just, sustainable and efficient settlements. According to this Act, the principle of spatial resilience refers to ‘flexibility in spatial plans, policies and land use management systems are accommodated to ensure sustainable livelihoods in communities most likely to suffer the impacts of economic and environmental shocksʼ. While the concept of resilience is widely understood, does the same apply to that of spatial resilience as defined by SPLUMA? This paper describes a study conducted to determine how practicing and development professionals in the Western Cape Province (South Africa) interpret the concept of spatial resilience. The results indicate that while the concept of resilience was generally understood, there were diverse interpretations of the development principle contained in the Act. Among the implications hereof are contradictory or counterproductive policy or plans. Thus, a more uniform understanding of the concept is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Taleb, N. N. (2012) Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House

References

  • Alschuler, K. N., Kratz, A. L., & Ehde, D. M. (2016). Resilience and vulnerability in individuals with chronic pain and physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 61(1), 7–18. doi:10.1037/rep0000055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asprone, D., & Manfredi, G. (2014). Linking disaster resilience and urban sustainability: a glocal approach for future cities. Disasters, 39(S1), S96–S111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Society and Natural Resources, 26(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.736605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience, the governance of complexity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelleri, L., Waters, J. J., Olazabal, M., & Minucci, G. (2015). Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environment and Urbanization. doi:10.1177/0956247814550780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, R., Johannessen-Henry, C. T., Raju, E., & Tulsiani, S. (2015). Resilience in disaster research: three versions. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 32(1–2), 44–54. doi:10.1080/10286608.2015.1025064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, J. L., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L., & Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? “reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 299–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Weijer, F. (2013). Resilience: a Trojan horse for a new way of thinking? European Centre for Development Policy Management discussion paper no 139. Maastricht: ECDPM www.ecdpm.org/dp139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Cooperative Government. (2016). Integrated Urban Development Framework. Pretoria: Department of Cooperative Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, C. (2009). Urban sustainability science as a new paradigm for planning. Paper presented at the Smart and Sustainable Built Environments (SASBE 09) Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 14–19 June.

  • Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., Leetaru, K., & Melton J. D. (2010). On the interpretability of the law: Lessons from the decoding of National Constitutions. Paper presented at the “Measuring the Rule of Law” Conference, School of Law, University of Texas at Austin, 26–27 March.

  • Elmqvist, T. (2014). Urban resilience thinking. Solutions, 5(5), 26–30 http://www.thesolutionsjournal.org/node/237196?page=16 22/2/2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Barnett, G., & Wilkerson, C. (2014). Exploring urban sustainability and resilience. In L. J. Pearson, P. W. Newton, & P. Roberts (Eds.), Resilient and sustainable cities, a future (pp. 19–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H., van der Leeu, S. E., Redman, C., Mefferet, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., & Elmqvist, T. (2010). Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio, 39, 531–545. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 2(2), 14–21 http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol2iss2/0608-028.fiksel.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockstrom, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20 [online] URL: http://www.ccologyandsocicty.org/voll5!iss4/art20/. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2010_folke.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Bobbins, K., Culwick, C., Humby, T. L., La Mantia, C., Todes, A., & Weakley, D. (2014). Urban resilience thinking for municipalities. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, Gauteng City-Region Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegney, D. G., Rees, C. S., Eley, R., Osseiran-Moisson, R., & Francis, K. (2015). The contribution of individual psychological resilience in determining the professional quality of life of Australian nurses. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 1613. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., & Thomalla, F. (2004). Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? EVA working paper no. 9/ DINAS-COAST working paper no. 14. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madni, A. M., & Jackson, S. (2009). Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Systems Journal, 3(2), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannakkara, S., & Wilkinson, S. (2013). Build back better principles for post-disaster structural improvements. Structural Survey, 31(4), 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Breen, P., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Resilience: a literature review. Bellagio Initiative. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., van der Leeuw, S., Rockström, J., Hinkel, J., Downing, T., Folke, C., & Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15(3), 11 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, P. J., Hastings, A., & Edwards, H. J. (2007). Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature, 450, 98–101. doi:10.1038/nature06252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Planning Commission. (2012). National development plan 2030: Our future, make it work, www.npconline.co.za. Accessed 17 November 2013.

  • Nel, D. (2016). Exploring a complex adaptive systems approach to the study of urban change. Masters dissertation, Town and Regional Planning, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

  • OECD. (2013). OECD Economic Surveys: South Africa 2013. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/eco_surveys-zaf-2013-en. Accessed 18 June 2015.

  • Oranje, M., & Merrifield, A. (2010). National spatial development planning in South Africa 1930-2010: an introductory comparative analysis. Town and regional Planning, 56, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. J., Newton, P. W., & Roberts, P. (Eds.). (2014). Resilient and sustainable cities, a future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, A., de Graaff, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Resilience: an evolutionary approach to spatial economic systems. Working paper, Tinbergen institute discussion paper, no. 01–100/3. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/85814/1/01100.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa. (2001). White paper on spatial planning and land use management. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Affairs. http://www.sapi.org.za/sites/default/files/document-library/White%20Paper%20on%20Spatial%20Planning%20and%20Land%20Use%20Management%202001.pdf

  • Republic of South Africa. (2013). Spatial planning and land use management act (act no. 16 of 2013). Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeliger, L., & Turok, I. (2013). Towards sustainable cities: extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory. Sustainability, 5, 2108–2128. doi:10.3390/su5052108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2013). Transforming South Africa's divided cities: can devolution help? International Planning Studies, 18(2), 168–187. doi:10.1080/13563475.2013.774146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2014). The resilience of South African cities a decade after local democracy. Environment and Planning A, 46(4), 749–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The resilient city. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Niekerk, W. (2013). Translating disaster resilience into spatial planning practice in South Africa: challenges and champions. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 5(1), Art. #53. doi:10.4102/jamba. v5i1.53.6 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, J., & Oranje, M. (2014). The post 1994 south African spatial planning system and bill of rights: a meaningful and mutually beneficial fit? Planning Theory, 13, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 43–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: sustaining people and ecosystems in a changing world. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzig, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13 .http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. M., & Walsh, J. J. (2015). Community resilience assessment and literature analysis. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning, 9(1), 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, I., & O’Hare. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 934–950. doi:10.1068/c12117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (2012). Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Planning theory, 11, 148–169. doi:10.1177/1473095211426274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, R., Wang, R., Lou, C.-W., & Lin, J.-H. (2015). Compressive properties of high-resilience thermal-bonding cushioning inter/intra-ply hybrid composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 49(30), 3823–3835. doi:10.1177/0021998315569750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verna Nel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnes, A., Nel, V. Putting Spatial Resilience into Practice. Urban Forum 28, 219–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-017-9303-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-017-9303-6

Keywords

Navigation