Abstract
Nearly 70 % of sub-Saharan Africa’s urban population live in informal settlements and populations are expected to double by 2030. Based on the constitutional right to adequate housing and growing public pressure and dissent, the South African government has begun a process of large-scale formalisation through the provision of housing and infrastructure to informal areas. A disjuncture has however occurred and conflicts have arisen between what are understood as modernist ideas of how cities should appear and function (formality) and an alternate, organic and flexible mode of thought (the informal). This conflict is seen by some authors as a ‘clash of governmentalities’ which goes deeper than a simple lack of dialogue, inadequate participation and/or a disinclination to see others’ points of view. For a number of years, calls have been made for a way to organise these governmentalities and perspectives, understand what goes on at their interface and unpack the complexity that exists between them. Integral Theory and its AQAL (All Quadrants, All Levels) framework are fast becoming a sought-after arena of academic discourse. It deals specifically with complex interactions and perspectives and offers a methodology that draws together a number of already existing separate paradigms and perspectives into a unified, interrelated framework. This paper uses the AQAL framework and Integral Theory as a tool to map the differing governmentalities (rationalities, techniques and practices) that exist in the upgrading of informal settlements in Cape Town and understand their relationship and interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, M. (2002). An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. Habitat International, 6(3), 303–315.
Adlard, G. (2006). An evaluation of the new rest upgrade. Master’s thesis, Department of Environmental and Geographical Studies, Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
Angignu, N., & Huchzermeyer, M. (2009). Towards urban inclusion: Planact’s response to the phenomenon of informal settlements. Johannesburg: Planact.
Brown, B. (2005). Theory and practice of integral sustainable development. Part 1—quadrants and the practitioner. AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(2), 1–9.
Charlton, S., & Kihato, C. (2006). Reaching the poor: an analysis of the evolution of South Africa’s housing programme. In U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, & J. du Toit (Eds.), In democracy and delivery: urban policy in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
DeKay, M. (2011). Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives. Oxon: Earthscan.
Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2007). Integral teacher, integral students, integral classroom: applying integral theory to education. AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 2(2), 72–103.
Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (2009). An overview of integral theory: an all-inclusive framework for the 21st century. Integral Institute, 1, 1–24, Resource Paper No.
Fieuw, W. (2011). Informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town’s Hangberg: local government, urban governance and the ‘right to the city’. Master’s thesis, Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
Gabardi, W. (2001). Negotiating postmodernism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gardener, D. (2003). Getting South Africans under shelter: an overview of the South African housing sector. Johannesburg: Housing Finance Resource Programme.
Gontsana, M. (2013). Cape Town’s informal settlements keep growing. http://wFww.groundup.org.za/content/cape-town%E2%80%99s-informal-settlements-keep-growing. Accessed 5 May 2013.
Graham, N. (2006). Informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town: challenges, constraints and contradictions within local government. In M. Huchzermeyer & A. Karam (Eds.), Informal settlements. A perpetual challenge? Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Gunter, A. (2014). Renting shacks: landlords and tenants in the informal. Urban Challenge (Urbani izziv), 25(s), S96–S107.
Haigh, M. (2013). AQAL integral: a holistic framework for pedagogic research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1, 1–18.
Huchzermeyer, M. (1999). Current informal settlement intervention in South Africa: four case studies of people-driven initiative. Cape Town: CSIR Boutek, University of Cape Town.
Huchzermeyer, M. (2004). From “contravention of laws” to “lack of rights”: redefining the problem of informal settlements in South Africa. Habitat International, 28(3), 333–347.
Huchzermeyer, M. (2006). The new instrument for upgrading informal settlements in South Africa: contributions and constraints. In M. Huchzermeyer & A. Karam (Eds.), Informal settlements. A perpetual challenge. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Huchzermeyer, M. (2008). Slum upgrading in Nairobi within the housing and basic services market: a housing rights concern. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43(1), 19–39.
Huchzermeyer, M., & Karam, A. (Eds.). (2006). Informal settlements. A perpetual challenge? Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Jolobe, Z. (2006). Things fall apart, can the centre hold? The state of coalition politics in the Cape Metropolitan Council. In U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, & J. du Toit (Eds.), Democracy and delivery: urban policy in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Massey, R. (2013). Competing rationalities and informal settlement upgrading in Cape Town, South Africa: a recipe for failure. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(4), 605–613.
Massey, R. (2014). Exploring counter-conduct in upgraded informal settlements: the case of women residents in Makhaza and New Rest (Cape Town), South Africa. Habitat International, 44(2014), 290–296.
Mayhew, S. (Ed.). (2004). A dictionary of geography (article: governmentality). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonald, D., & Smith, L. (2004). Privatising Cape Town: from apartheid to neo-liberalism in the mother city. Urban Studies, 41(8), 1461–1484.
Miraftab, F. (2007). Governing post-apartheid spatiality: implementing city improvement districts in Cape Town. Antipode, 39(4), 602–626.
Misselhorn, M. (2008). Position paper on informal settlement upgrading. Part of a strategy for the second economy. Office of the South African Presidency. Cape Town: Urban LandMark.
Myers, G. (2011). African cities: alternative visions of urban theory and practice. London: Zed Books.
Naidoo, N., Chidley, C., & McNamara, A. (2008). The implementation of hygiene education programmes in informal settlements, developing communities: water supply and sanitation. The Water Research Commission (WRC), WRC Report No 1656/1/08.
Norton, L. (2012). Integral sustainable design. http://www.metropolismag.com/pov/20120113/integral sustainable-design. Accessed 25 May 2012.
O’Brien, K. & Hochachka, G. (2010). Integral adaptation to climate change. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 5(1), 89–102.
Oldfield, S. (2002). Partial formalization and its implications for community governance in an informal settlement. Urban Forum, 13(20), 102–115.
Pikholz, L. (1997). Managing politics and storytelling: meeting the challenge of upgrading informal settlements in South Africa. Habitat International, 21(4), 377–396.
Rose, N., O'Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 2, 83–104.
Saff, G. (1994). The changing face of the South Africa city: from urban apartheid to the deracialization of space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(3), 377–391.
Stewart, C. (2008). Integral scenarios: re-framing theory, building from practice. Futures, 40, 160–172.
Tshikotshi, V. (2009). The challenges of eradicating informal settlements in South Africa by 2014. The case of Seraleng sustainable human settlement, Rustenburg local municipality, North West Province. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Watson, V. (2002). Change and continuity in spatial planning: metropolitan planning in Cape Town under political transition. London: Routledge.
Watson, V. (2003). Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(4), 395–408.
Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275.
Wikipedia (2014). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa. Accessed 3 July 2014.
Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.
Wilber, K. (2003). Foreword. In F. Visser (Ed.), Ken Wilber: thought as passion. Albany: SUNY Press.
Wilber, K. (2005a). Introduction to integral theory and practice: IOS basic and the AQAL map. AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1–32.
Wilber, K. (2005b). The integral operating system, version 1.0. IOS users guide. Boulder: Sounds True Inc.
Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality: a startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boston: Integral Books.
Wilkinson, P. (2004). Renegotiating local governance in a post-apartheid city: the case of Cape Town. Urban Forum, 15(3), 213–230.
Yose, C. (1999) From shacks to houses: space usage and social change in a Western Cape shanty town. Master’s thesis, Department of Social Anthropology, Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
Acknowledgments
The people of Makhaza, New Rest, the City of Cape Town and related organisations are thanked for their willingness to participate in the study. This paper is dedicated in memory of the late Zuki Hani who was instrumental in this research. This research was partially funded through SANPAD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massey, R. Integral Theory: a Tool for Mapping and Understanding Conflicting Governmentalities in the Upgrading of Cape Town’s Informal Settlements. Urban Forum 26, 303–319 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9252-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9252-x