Skip to main content
Log in

Overcoming the Challenge of Vertical Consolidation in South Africa's Low-Income Settlements: a Case Study of Du Noon

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretically, the evident demand for housing in growing cities, particularly in the Global South would result in vertical consolidation of properties. However, unlike places in Latin America, where market and state responses to urbanisation are pushing cities higher and higher, in South Africa, the densification and land use intensity has, generally, remained horizontal, rather than vertical in nature. Du Noon offers an interesting counter position to this narrative. Unlike other Reconstruction and Development Housing Programme settlements, many property owners are demolishing the state-delivered units and erecting double-storey rental accommodation. Drawing from interviews conducted with 21 of these structure owners, this paper explores the drivers of this ‘vertical consolidation’ in Du Noon drawing lessons for housing policy and practice in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The relevance and value of higher density approaches can be seen in the work of Dewar (2000), Jenks (2000) and Burton et al. (2004)

  2. The term “RDP housing” is widely recognised to mean housing delivered through the state delivered, subsidised housing programme (Charlton 2009). In some quarters, the term has been replaced by ‘BNG housing’ to reflect the change in housing approach contained in the ‘Breaking New Ground’ policy document. Notwithstanding this, the term RDP housing is still widely used.

  3. The Urban Foundation, founded in 1976, piloted a project in Inanda, Newtown in 1980, producing 4,000 shell homes for internal division by beneficiaries. This was followed by the government initiated pilot project in Khayelitsha in 1983 where 5,000 complete homes were produced for extendibility (Jones and Datta 2000). In the early 1990s, the IDT launched some of the first systematised and country wide ‘site and service’ projects as part of the implementation plan for the Urban Foundation’s 1990 Proposal for a National Housing Policy (Huchzermeyer 2001a, b; Khosa 2000).

  4. Provided it is physically possible, legally permissible and financially viable.

  5. This paper presents the neo-classical theory from a profit maximisation (income) perspective but the same principles would apply if it was presented from a household utility perspective.

  6. It is important to note that Shisaka did not differentiate between well located and poorly located sites.

  7. There was already reference to this community in the Approval of Layout Plan for the Less Formal Settlement: Du Noon Millerton where it states that ‘the location of Phase 1 should also take cognisance of the site where the relocated ‘West Beach squatter community is temporarily houses’ (Department of Housing, Local Government, and Planning: Provincial Administration: Western Cape 1995, p. 4)

  8. The Marconi Bean upgrade and relocation was a result of extensive negotiations between the community and the local municipality, supported by NGOs including the Development Action Group (DAG) and the Surplus Peoples Project (SPP) (personal communication DAG).

References

  • Adebayo, P. (2008). Preconditions for housing consolidation: towards a suitable package of support for incremental housing in South Africa: a case study of eThekweni municipality.

  • Berrisford, S. (2011). Unravelling apartheid spatial planning legislation in South Africa. Urban Forum: Springer. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A. (2009) Note on spatial issues in South Africa. Available at http://alainbertaud.com.

  • Bertaud, A. (2010) Land markets, government intervention and housing affordability. Wolfensohn Centre for Development at Brookings. Working Paper 18. Available at http://alainbertaud.com.

  • Built Environment Support Group. (2000). Study of post-housing subsidy housing consolidation in the Durban Metropolitan Area: executive summary. Available at http://www.besg.co.za/downloads/Housing_consolidation_Nov_2000.pdf

  • Burton, E., Jenks, M., & Williams, K. (Eds.). (2004). The compact city: a sustainable urban form? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, S. (2009). Housing for the nation, the city and the household: competing rationalities as a constraint to reform? Development Southern Africa, 26(2), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, S., & Kihato, C. (2006). Reaching the poor? An analysis of the influences on the evolution of South Africa’s housing programme. Democracy and delivery: Urban policy in South Africa, pp. 252–282

  • Cirolia, L. (2013). (W)escaping the challenges of the city: a critique of Cape Town’s proposed satellite town. Urban Forum. doi:10.1007/s12132-013-9212-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing, Local Government, and Planning: Provincial Administration: Western Cape (1995) Approval of layout plan for the less formal settlement: Du noon, Milnerton.

  • Department of Human Settlements. (2004). “Breaking new ground”: a comprehensive plan for the development of sustainable human settlements. Pretoria: Housing Policy, Department of Human Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Action Group. (2003). Review of international and national trends and best practice in housing. Cape Town: Development Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, D. (2000). The relevance of the compact city approach: the management of urban growth in South African cities. Compact Cities: sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. pp. 209–218

  • Financial and Fiscal Commission. (2011) The Economic and Fiscal Costs of Inefficient Land Use Patterns in South Africa (final report). Palmer Development Group. http://pdg.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FFC-cost-of-inefficient-land-use.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2013

  • Glahe, F., & Lee, D. (1989). Microeconomics—theory and application. Second Edition. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

  • Goodall, B. (1972). The economics of urban areas. Urban and Regional Planning Series. Oxford: Pergamon Press

  • Goodland, R. (1996). The housing challenge in South Africa. Urban Studies, 33, 1629–1645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Huchzermeyer, M. and Mayekiso, M. (2003). Confronting fragmentation: housing and urban development in a democratising society. Juta Academic

  • Harrison, P., Todes, A., & Watson, V. (2008). Planning and transformation: Learning from the post-apartheid experience. London: Routledge

  • Harvey, J., & Jowsey, E. (2004). Urban land economics (6th ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2001a). Housing for the poor? Negotiated housing policy in South Africa. Habitat International, 25(3), 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2001b). Upgrading through the project-linked capital subsidy: implications for the strategies of informal settlement residents and their community organizations. Urban Forum, 13(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. (2000). Compact cities: sustainable urban forms for developing countries. In: R. Burgess (ed). London: Taylor & Francis

  • Jones, G. A., & Datta, K. (2000). Enabling markets to work? Housing policy in the 'new' South Africa. International Planning Studies, 5(3), 393–416. & Francis.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F., & Thring, P. (2003). Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Sandown South Africa: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosa, M. (2000) Infrastructure mandate for change: 1994–1999. Pretoria. HSRC.

  • Kihato, C., & Royston, L. (2013). Rethinking emerging land markets in rapidly growing Southern African Cities. Urban Forum, 24(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L, Gindrey, V. (2008) Gauteng 2055—trend paper: population & migration. Report prepared for the Gauteng Department of Economic Development.

  • Lemanski, C. (2009). Augmented informality: South Africa’s backyard dwellings as a by-product of formal housing policies. Habitat International, 33, 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabin, A., & Smit, D. (1997). Reconstructing South Africa’s cities? The making of urban planning 1900–2000. Planning Perspectives, 12(2), 193–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, C. and Berrisford, S. (2007) Do informal land markets work for poor people? An assessment of three metropolitan cities in South Africa: literature review. Pretoria: Urban LandMark. Available at http://www.urbanlandmar.org.za

  • McDonald, J., & McMillen, D. (2011). Urban economics and real estate: theory and policy (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M. (2002). Core housing, enablement and urban poverty: the consolidation paths of households living in two South African settlements. PhD thesis. University of Newcastle

  • Napier, M., Berrisford, S., Kihato, C., McGaffin, R., & Royston, L. (2013). Trading places—accessing land in African cities. Johannesburg: African Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Department of Human Settlements. (2010). For outcome 8 delivery agreements: sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life. Available at http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=135746.

  • National Department of Human Settlements. (2013). Enhancements to the national norms and standards for the construction of stand alone residential dwellings and engineering services and adjustment of the housing subsidy quantum.

  • Nuttall, J. (1997). The first five years: the story of the independent development trust. Cape Town: Independent Development Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, E. (2009). Post-apartheid geographies in South Africa: why are urban divides so persistent. Interdisciplinary debates on development and cultures: cities in development spaces (p. 15). Leuven University: Conflicts and Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston, L. (2009) Informal land markets and the poor. Presentation to the Policy and Development Management Course. University of the Witwatersrand. Urban LandMark

  • Rubin, M. and Gardner, D. 2013. Development of a response to backyarding. Prepared for: the South African Local Government Association (SALGA) (Final Report).

  • Rust, K. 2006. Analysis of South Africa’s housing. FinMark Trust: sector performance

  • Shisaka Development Management Services (2011) RDP asset study—qualitative report. Prepared for the FinMark Trust. Available at www.housingfinanceafrica.org.

  • Shisaka Development Management Services. (2004) Township residential property market. Report. Prepared for the FinMark Trust. Available at www.housingfinanceafrica.org.

  • Smith, D. M. (Ed.). (1992). The apartheid city and beyond: urbanization and social change in South Africa. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syagga P, Mittullah W and Karirah-Gitau S. (2002) Nairobi situation analysis supplementary study: a rapid economic appraisal of rents in slums and informal settlements. Report prepared for the Government of Kenya and United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

  • Tissington, K. (2011). A resource guide to housing in South Africa 1994–2010: legislation, policy, programmes and practice. SERI

  • Tomlinson, M. (1992). South Africa’s housing policy: lessons learnt from four years of the new housing subsidy scheme. Third World Planning Review, 2(3), 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2001). Persistent polarisation post-apartheid? Progress towards urban integration in Cape Town. Urban Studies, 38(13), 2349–2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (1998). Housing policy in South Africa. Habitat International, 22(3), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, H. (2011) A study of privately-delivered rental housing in Du Noon, Cape Town. Presentation to the South African Housing Foundation.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement is given to Darren Bosman, James Brownlee, Edwin Bath, Marc Forrester, Keletso Modise and Inge van Rooyen who undertook the field research for the paper towards completion of their honours degree in the Department of Construction Economics and Management at the University of Cape Town.

This work is supported by Mistra Urban Futures, a global research and knowledge center in sustainable urban development, funded by the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) and the Mistra Foundation for Strategic Development.

Mistra Urban Futures is an international center for sustainable urban development. The headquarters is located in Gothenburg, Sweden and the center operates in five cities around the world including Cape Town, Gothenburg, Greater Manchester, Kisumu and Shanghai. Co-production of knowledge as well as creating Fair, Green and Dense cities is a winning concept for a successful sustainable urban future. A global Arena provides for interaction with external actors and between the five cities. Mistra Urban Futures is funded by the Mistra Foundation for Strategic Development, the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA), and seven consortium members.

Acknowledgment is given to the Western Cape Department of Human Settlements for their ongoing support of the African Centre for Cities Human Settlements Citylab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liza Rose Cirolia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGaffin, R., Cirolia, L.R. & Massyn, M. Overcoming the Challenge of Vertical Consolidation in South Africa's Low-Income Settlements: a Case Study of Du Noon. Urban Forum 26, 59–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9232-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9232-6

Keywords

Navigation