Skip to main content
Log in

Joseph schumpeter and his legacy in innovation studies

  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

Inspired by the recent rediscovery of work of Schumpeter in science and policymaking the author reviews and appraises Schumpeterian theory and that of his followers in innovation studies. Although Schumpeter’s vision suffers from some defects, I argue that there is more to learn from this author than his well-known idea of “creative destruction”. In particular, Schumpeter’s view on innovation policy is something that may have vital relevance to today’s increasingly policy-dominated world. We therefore conclude that besides his key ideas on innovation-led development also his policy view should be regarded as a significant legacy in innovation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870. American Economic Review, 46, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, J. and N. Gobbin (2001). Schumpeter and the Rise of Modern Environmentalism. Nota di Lavoro della FEEM, No. 18, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor (2000). Regional Economics and Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B. and M.P. Feldman (1996). Innovative Clusters and the Industry Life Cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1983). Picking Losers: The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. The Institute for Economic Affairs: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantner, U. and H. Hanusch (1994). Joseph Alois Schumpeter. In Hodgson, G.M., W.J. Samuels and M.R. Tool (Eds.). The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, L-Z. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (Ed.) (1995). Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayseele, P. van (1998). Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey. De Economist, 146, 391–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and K. Guy (1997). Innovation and Competitiveness. Technopolis Report, No. 97. Technopolis: Brighton/Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1984). The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1971). Polyarchy, Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. Yale University Press: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2003). Choosing to Grow: Knowledge, Innovation and Jobs in a Cohesive Society. European Communities: Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (1997) (Ed.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2003). Schumpeter and the Revival of Evolutionary Economics: An Appraisal of the Literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 125–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. and S. Kaplan (2001). Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—And How to Successfully Transfrom Them. Currency: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourastié, J. (1949). Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siècle: Progrès Technique, Progrès Économique, Progrès Social. Presses Universitaires de France: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., J. Clark and L.G. Soete (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. Pinter: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1984). The Age of Schumpeter. American Economic Review, 74 (Papers and Proceedings), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H.T. and B.L. Weinstein (1989). Technology, Structural Change, and the Industrial Policy Debate. In Rees, J. (Ed.). Technology, Regions and Policy. Rowman and Littlefield: Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstädter, E. and Perlman, M. (Eds.) (1996). Behavioral Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics. University of Michigan Press: Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (1993). Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Polity Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. and G.M. MacDonald (1994). The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knottenbauer, K. (2000). Theorien des Sektoralen Strukturwandels. Metropolis: Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagendijk, A. and J. Cornford (2000). Regional Institutions and Knowledge: Tracking New Forms of Regional Development Policy. Geoforum, 31, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology. Ballinger: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs (2003). In Actie voor Innovatie: Nederlandse Kenniseconomie naar de Top. Ministry of Economic Affairs: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Aldine-Atherthon: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2000). Learning Regions and Cities: Knowledge, Learning and Regional Innovation Systems. OECD Publications: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, F. (1988). The Role of Development’s New Place in a General Theory of Economic Activity. In Higgins, B. and D.J. Savoie (Eds.). Regional Economic Development. Unwin Hyman: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1998). On Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaymaaykers, M.J.G.C. and J.A. McCahery (2000). Corporate Governance and Capital Markets: An International Perspective. SMO: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. Yale University Press: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of Society: An Investigation into the Changing Character of Contemporary Social Life. Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1992). Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1416–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1912). Die Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot: Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1918). Die Krise des Steuerstaates. Leuschner & Lubensky: Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1935). The Analysis of Economic Change. Review of Economic Statistics, 2–10.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1937). Preface to the Japanese Edition of ‘Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung’. Reprinted in Swedberg, R. (Ed.) (1991b). Joseph A. Schumpeter: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (Volume 1 and 2). McGraw Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1940). The Influence of Protective Tariffs on the Industrial Development of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 2–7.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. George Allen and Unwin: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1948). Wage and Tax Policy in Transitional States of Society. Reprinted in Swedberg, R. (1991b). Joseph A. Schumpeter: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). American Institutions and Economic Progress. Reprinted in Swedberg, R. (1991b). Joseph A. Schumpeter: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithies, A. (1951). Memorial: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883–1950 In Harris, S.E. (Ed.). Schumpeter: Social Scientist. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbatty, J. (1985). Die Staatskonzeption bei Keynes und Schumpeter, In Scharf, H. (Hrsg.). Studien zur Entwicklung der Ökonomischen Theorie IV. Duncker & Humblot: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolper, W.F. (1984). The Relevance of Schumpeter’s Ideas for Economic Policy. Kieler Vorträge Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Heft 106, Universität Kiel, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (1991a). Joseph A. Schumpeter: His Life and Work. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (1991b). Joseph A. Schumpeter: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1992). The Long Wave in the Economy: The Present Crisis in International Perspective. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2001). What is Strategy—And Does it Matter?, 2nd edition. Thomson: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (Ed.) (1993). Evolutionary Economics. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweimüller, J. (2000). Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs Meet Engel’s Law: The Impact of Inequality on Innovation-Driven Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hospers, GJ. Joseph schumpeter and his legacy in innovation studies. Know Techn Pol 18, 20–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-005-1003-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-005-1003-1

Keywords

Navigation