Skip to main content
Log in

Standardization systems as indicators of mental, cultural and socio-economic states

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

Standardization processes under the aegis of standards bodies in different geographic domains exhibit similar institutional features, such as the consensus principle in decision making. Nevertheless, among national and regional standardization systems there are significant differences that primarily refer to different attitudes that actors in the respective domains hold towards standardization. Furthermore, these differences in attitude are the result of different cultural, socio-economic and even mental states. Using an institutional approach, this paper argues that the state of standardization system may serve as an indicator of the respective overall mental, cultural and social-economic states in different domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Chamber of Commerce in Russia (1997). White Paper on Standardization, Certification and Licensing in the Russian Federation. Moscow: American Chamber of Commerce in Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute (2000). National Standards Strategy for the United States: New York: American National Standards Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A & Fennell, J. & Kaser, M. & Willetts, H.T. (Eds.) (1982). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Russia and the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2001a). Principles of Standards Work. http://www.en.din.de/sixcms/detail.php3?id=897 (24 Feb 2001).

  • DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. (2001b). Die Grundsätze der Normungsarbeit. http://www.din.de/portrait/grundreg.html (24 Feb 2001).

  • Falke, J. & Schepel, H. (2000). Legal Aspects of Standardization in the Member States of the EC and EFTA — Comparative Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girod, B. and Rabenstein, R. and Stenger, A. (1997). Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J.R., Schmitter, P.C. & Streeck, W. (1994). Capitalism, Sectors, Institutions, and Performance. In Governing Capitalist Economies, edited by J.R. Hollingsworth, P.C. Schmitter & W. Streeck, 3–16. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, H. (1957). Sowjetbuch. Cologne: Deutsche Industrieverlags-GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng, L.W. (1993). Standardization and Economic Development: The Singapore Experience. In The Role of Standardization in Economic Development, edited by The World Bank and International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 73–84. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liikanen, E. (2000): Co-Regulation. Speech held at a meeting held on the 4th of May 2000 by the Association of the European Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Metalworking Industries (Orgalime) Council. http://www.fitce.be/co-regulation.htm (20 Feb 2001).

  • Ludwig, K.-H. (1979): Technik und Ingenieure im Dritten Reich, Düsseldorf: Athenäum/Droste Taschenbücher Geschichte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malia, M. (1994). Vollstreckter Wahn: Russland 1917–1991. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1983). The Strategy of Social Choice, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. (1987). The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization, Journal of Common Market Studies 25: 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (2000). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism”. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reihlen, H. (1999). The State of Play. In Standardization for the 21th Century — Conference Reports (pp 1–22). Berlin: DIN — German Institute for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. (1994). Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNIP Register (2000): Russian National Standards System. http://www.snip.com/standards/index.html (25 Nov 2001).

  • Stalin, J.V. (1955). Concerning the Policy of Eliminating the Kulaks as a Class. In Works, edited by J.V. Stalin, 12: 184–189. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Reprinted 1998. Norcross, Ga.: Engineering & Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, B. (1997). Putting the U.S. Standardization System into Perspective: News Insights. DIN-Mitteilungen 76 (11): 792–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1987). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, A. (1999). Standards Battles Heat up Between United States and European Union. Quality Progress 32 (1): 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are indebted to Henk de Vries, Rotterdam School of Management, Netherlands Standardization Institute and Tineke Egyedi and Koen Dittrich, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czaya, A., Hesser, W. Standardization systems as indicators of mental, cultural and socio-economic states. Know Techn Pol 14, 24–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-001-1014-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-001-1014-5

Keywords

Navigation