Abstract
As a result of the aging of American society and the fact that older persons require a great deal more healthcare and much more expensive treatments, the costs are on the rise and spiraling out of control. As a solution, ethicists Daniel Callahan and others have proposed healthcare rationing on the basis of age. On the basis of utilitarian ethicist, these writers have argued that age-based rationing will lead to the provision of healthcare to the greatest number of people. Of course, utilizing other ethical theories other writers have opposed the rationing of healthcare on the basis of age. The paper presents the arguments made, and the ethical theories employed, by both sides, which suggest an ethical dilemma, thus most probably a debate about age-based rationing in the future. The author found it interesting to seek the views of professors teaching healthcare –related courses about this type of rationing. Utilizing grounded theory/ quantitative research methodology, designing a questionnaire that included some 14 questions, the author interviewed some 18 professors of healthcare courses in Pennsylvania. Utilizing grounded theory in the analysis of the results of the interviews led to some eight interesting themes, which are presented and analyzed in the paper. After presenting the results of that study, and not finding the application of age-based rationing feasible, the paper also discusses other alternative solutions for reducing healthcare costs, including the notion of fair innings suggested by Allan Williams. All these alternatives are discussed in the paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, H. (2006). A healthcare perception that is hard to swallow. Los Angeles Times, January 30.
Andre, C., & Velasquez, M. (1990). Aged-based health care rationing. Issues in Ethics, 3, 1–7.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, N. K. (1989). What limits may mean: a feminist critique of Daniel Callahan’s, Setting Limits. Hypatia, 4, 168–178.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Callahan, D. (1987). Setting limits: Medical goals in an aging society. New York, NY.
Callahan, D. (1998). False hopes: Overcoming the obstacles to sustainable, affordable medicine. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
Callahan, D., & Castle, C. (2003). Should age count in allocating health care resources? Alliance for Aging Research Crossroads, 18, 1–3.
Cassel, C. (2003). Ageism: Prevention and treatment for the elderly. Alliance for aging research: Living longer and loving it! Retrieved from http://www.agingreaserch.org/living_longer/archive.cfm.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publicaitons.
Douglas, A.H., & Paul, D.P. (2005). Healthcare rationing and cost control: Perspectives on the American health care system. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Business Administration Association Conference, 21–32.
Edelstein, L., Temkin, O., & Temkin, C. L. (Eds.). (1967). Ancient medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ellison, R. (1952). The invisible man. New York: Random House Publishers.
Etzioni, A. (2005). End game: what the elderly have earned. The American Scholar, 74, 32–40.
Fuchs, V. (2001). The financial problems of the elderly: A holistic approach. NBER Working Papers, 8236.
CAE Health Report. (2009). 1Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisers (June 2009, P.2).
Hosseini, H. (2005). The complex health care quality-cost challenge in the United States. In: Proceedings of the Third International Healthcare Systems Conference, 295–302.
Hosseini, H. (2007). The Aging of American Society, The Rising of Medical Care, and the Age-Based Rationing Debate, PhD Dissertation, Marywood University, Pennsylvania.
Lamm, R. (2004). The brave new world of health care. Denver: Fulcrum Publishing Co.
Lidz, J. W. (1995). Medicine as a metaphor in Plato. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 20, 527–541.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers: A Wiley Company.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluaiton & research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Payne, F. E., Jr. (1992). Counterpoint to “Teach us to number our days. Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, 6, 102–104.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1994). Reaction to special section on qualitative research in counseling process and outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 510–512.
Prager, K. (2002, May). The age-old question: Ethical issues in the care of the elderly. Talk given at the Cardiovascular Issues in Geriatrics Symposium, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rubenstein, H., & Masiewicki, L. (2004). Review of Richard Lamm’s The Brave New World of Health Care. Retrieved July 20, 2005 from http://growth-strategies.com/subpages/articles/118.html.
Rutecki, G. W., & Geib, J. D. (1992). Teach us to number our days: age and the rationing of medical care. Journal Of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, 6, 102–104.
Ruteki, G. (1993). Rationing medical care to the elderly revisited: futility as a just criterion. Journal Biblical Ethics Medicine, 7, 67–74.
Saporito, B. (2005). The e-Health revolution: how a bipartisan Bill by Hillary Clinton and Bill Frist could jump-start a new kind of health care reform. Time Magazine, 165, 53–65.
Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. E. (1999). Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
United States Senate Committee on Appropriations (2003). “Labor HHS subcommittee hearing statements of Mr. Donald Hoover”. Hearings & testimony, available at: http://approriations.senate.gov/text/hearingmarkups/record.cf=204944.
Weiss, C. (1994). Evaluation research: methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Williams, A. (1997). Intergenerational euity: an exploration of the fair innings argument. Health Economics, 6, 117–132.
Conflict of Interest
The author Hengameh Hosseini declares that she has no Conflict of Interest.
Informed Consent
As there is no person or personal data appearing in the paper, there is no one from whom a permission should be obtained in order to publish personal data.
Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hosseini, H. Aging and the Rising Costs of Healthcare in the United States: Can There be a Solution?. Ageing Int 40, 229–247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-014-9209-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-014-9209-8