Abstract
Master narratives about national history have been recognized as powerful cultural tools, influencing both historical understanding and national identity construction. For example, by the work of James Wertsch and studies on national history representation from a sociocultural point of view. However, the appropriation of these narratives needs to be considered in more detail for a clearer picture of how the nation is imagined and how this representation could change. In this paper a contribution is made by analyzing how the relation between past and present is constructed in master narrative representation, based on interviews with high school students narrating national history and presidential discourse commemorating it. It is proposed that the relation between past and present is constructed in three ways: past and present are identified; the past is idealized and their relation is teleologically constructed. By looking at how past and present are related in representations of the national past, the functioning of national historical myths as cultural tool becomes more clear. This contributes to clarifying how the master narrative constrains historical understanding and how it might enable national identification processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Commemoration of the 203rd anniversary of the May Revolution: Words from the President of the Nation (25-05-2013). See http://www.casarosada.gov.ar/discursos/26500-conmemoracion-del-203d-aniversario-de-la-revolucion-de-mayo-palabras-de-la-presidenta-de-la-nacion. Accessed on 19-01-2015.
President Obama’s second inaugural address (Transcript). Washington Post, January 21, 2013; http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-obamas-second-inaugural-address-transcript/2013/01/21/f148d234-63d6-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_story.html. Accessed on 19-01-2015.
References
Abowitz, K. K. (2002). Imagining citizenship: Cosmopolitanism or patriotism? Teachers College Record, August, 12. http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=11008. Accessed 19 June 2014 5:27:29PM.
Alridge, D. P. (2006). The limits of master narratives in history textbooks: an analysis of representations of Martin Luther King, Jr. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 662–686.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (1998). “It wasn’t a good part of history”: ambiguity and identity in middle grade students’ judgments of historical significance. Teachers College Record, 99, 478–513.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bellino, M. J., & Selman, B. L. (2012). The intersection of historical understanding and ethical reflection during early adolescence. A place where time is squared. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodriguez-Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 189–202). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Berger, S. (2012). De-nationalizing history teaching and nationalizing it differently! Some reflections on how to defuse the negative potential of national(ist) history teaching. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodriguez-Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 33–47). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Berger, S., & Lorenz, C. (Eds.) (2008). The contested nation: Ethnicity, class, religion and gender in national histories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bevernage, B., & Lorenz, C. (2013). Breaking up time: Negotiating the borders between present, past and future. Amsterdam: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
Bjerg, H. (2011). Historicizing the uses of the past: Scandinavian perspectives on history culture, historical consciousness and didactics of history related to World War II (time - meaning - culture). Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.
Bloch, M. (1953). The historians craft. New York: Vintage Books - Random House.
Burke, P. (2001). New perspectives on historical writing. London: Polity.
Burke, P. (2005). History and social theory (2nd ed.). Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? London: Macmillan.
Carretero, M. (2011). Constructing patriotism. Teaching history and memories in global worlds. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Carretero, M., & Bermudez, A. (2012). Constructing Histories. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 625–646). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carretero, M., & Kriger, M. (2011). Historical representations and conflicts about indigenous people as national identities. Culture and Psychology, 17(2), 177–195.
Carretero, M., & Lee, P. (2014). Learning Historical Concepts. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of learning sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 587–604). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Carretero, M., & Solcoff, K. (2012). Commentary on Brockmeier’s remapping memory: the relation between past, present and future as a metaphor of memory. Culture and Psychology, 18(1), 14–22. doi:10.1177/1354067X11427463.
Carretero, M., & Van Alphen, F. (2014). Do master narratives change among high school students? Analyzing national historical representations characteristics. Cognition and Instruction, 32(3), 290–312. doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.919298.
Carretero, M., & Voss, J. F. (Eds.). (1994). Cognitive and instructional processes in history and social sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Carretero, M., Asensio, M., & Rodriguez-Moneo, M. (Eds.). (2012a). History education and the construction of national identities. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Carretero, M., Lopez, C., Gonzalez, M. F., & Rodriguez Moneo, M. (2012b). Students historical narratives and concepts about the nation. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodriguez Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 153–170). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Carretero, M., Castorina, J. A., & Levinas, M. L. (2013). Conceptual change and historical narratives about the nation: A theoretical and empirical approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 269–287). New York: Routledge.
Chiaramonte, J. (1989). Formas de identidad en el Rio de la Plata luego de 1810. [Forms of identity in the River Plate after 1810.]. Boletín del Instituto de Historia Argentina y Americana ‘Dr. E Ravignani’, 3(1), 71–92.
Chiaramonte, J. C. (2013). Usos políticos de la historia: Lenguaje de clases y revisionismo histórico. [The political use of history: language of classes and revisionism.]. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
Duveen, G., & Gilligan, C. (2013). On interviews: A conversation with Carol Gilligan. In S. Jovchelovitch & B. Wagoner (Eds.), Development as social process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen (pp. 124–131). London: Routledge.
Epstein, T., & Schiller, J. (2005). Perspective matters: social identity and the teaching and learning of national history. Social Education, 69(4), 201–204.
Ferro, M. (1984). The use and abuse of history, or, how the past is taught to children. London: Routledge [2002: revised French edition, Paris, PUF].
Fischer, D. H. (1970). Historians’ fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. NY: Harper & Row.
Foster, S. (2012). Re-thinking historical textbooks in a globalized world. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodríguez-Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 49–62). Charlotte: Information Age.
Foster, S. J., & Crawford, K. A. (Eds.). (2006). What shall we tell the children? International perspectives on school history textbooks. Greenwich: Information Age.
Glaveanu, V., & Yamamoto, K. (2012). Bridging history and social psychology: What, how and why. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 431–439. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9213-z.
Goldberg, T. (2013). “It’s in my veins”: Identity and disciplinary practice in students’ discussions of a historical issue. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 33–64.
Goldberg, T., Baruch, B. B., & Porat, D. (2011). “Could they do it differently?”: narrative and argumentative changes in students’ writing following discussion of “hot” historical issues. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 185–217.
Grever, M., & Stuurman, S. (2007). Beyond the Canon: History for the 21st century. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hammack, P. (2010). Identity as burden or benefit? youth, historical narrative, and the legacy of political conflict. Human Development, 53, 173–201.
Hansen, J. (2012). De-nationalize history and what have we done? Ontology, essentialism, and the search for a cosmopolitan alternative. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodriguez Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 153–170). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Heller, A. (2006). European master narratives about freedom. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary European social theory (pp. 257–265). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2012). Narrative, memory and social representations: a conversation between history and social psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 440–456. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9217-8.
Knights, M. (2012). Taking a historical turn: possible points of connection between social psychology and history. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 584–598. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9211-1.
Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past. On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Leinhardt, G., & Ravi, A. (2013). Changing Historical Conceptions of History. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 253–268). New York: Routledge.
Levesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically: Educating students for the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Levi, G., & Revel, J. (Eds.). (2002). Political uses of the past. The recent Mediterranean experiences. NY: Routledge.
Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.
Lopez, C., & Carretero, M. (2012). Identity construction and the goals of history education. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodriguez-Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 139–150). Charlotte: Information Age.
Lopez, C., Carretero, M., & Rodriguez-Moneo, M. (2014a). Conquest or reconquest? Students’ conceptions of nation embedded in a historical narrative. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.919863. Published online: 14 Nov 2014.
Lopez, C., Carretero, M., & Rodriguez-Moneo, M. (2014b). Telling a national narrative that’s not your own. Does it enable disciplinary historical understanding? Culture & Psychology, 20, 547–571. doi:10.1177/1354067X14554156.
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Megill, A. (2007). Historical knowledge, historical error: A contemporary guide to practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Millstone, N. (2012). Historicising common sense. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 529–543. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9222-y.
Nakou, I., & Barca, I. (Eds.). (2010). Contemporary public debates over history education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Ortemberg, P. (2013). El origen de las fiestas patrias. Hispanoamérica en la era de las independencias. [The origin of patriotic rituals. Latin America in the age of the independences.]. Rosario: Prohistoria Ediciones.
Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Historical representation as mediated action: Official history as a tool. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history: International review of history education (Vol. 2, pp.23–38). London: Routledge.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and Nation. London: Sage Publications.
Rosa Rivero, A. (2004). Memoria, historia e identidad. Una reflexión sobre el papel de la enseñanza de la historia en el desarrollo de la cuidadanía. [Memory, history and identity. A reflection on the role of history education in the development of citizenship.]. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Aprender y pensar la historia (pp. 47–69). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.
Rüsen, J. (2004). Historical consciousness: Narrative structure, moral function, and ontogenetic development. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 63–85). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Seixas, P. (Ed.). (2004). Theorizing historical consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. London: Penguin.
Straub, J. (Ed.). (2005). Narration, identity and historical consciousness. New York: Berghahn Books.
Van Sledright, B. (2008). Narratives of nation-state, historical knowledge and school history education. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 109–146.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. (2004). Specific narratives and schematic narrative templates. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 49–62). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Wertsch, J., & Rozin, M. (2000). The Russian Revolution: Official and Unofficial Accounts. In J. F. Voss & M. Carretero (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history (pp. 39–60). NY: Routledge.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Acknowledgments
We thank José Antonio Castorina and César López for their contributions to the realization of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was written with the support of Project PICT 2012-1594 (ANPCYT - National Research Agency, Argentina) and Project EDU-2013-42531 (DGICYT - Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica, Spain), both of them coordinated by the second author. The first author receives a scholarship from CONICET (Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientíficas y Técnicas) Argentina. We would like to express our gratitude for that support.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Alphen, F., Carretero, M. The Construction of the Relation Between National Past and present in the Appropriation of Historical Master Narratives. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 512–530 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9302-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9302-x