Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Researcher as Experimental Subject: Using Self-Experimentation to Access Experiences, Understand Social Phenomena, and Stimulate Reflexivity

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current article argues that researcher-as-subject self-experimentation can provide valuable insight and systematic knowledge to social psychologists. This approach, the modus operandi of experimental psychology when the field was in its infancy, has been largely eclipsed by an almost exclusive focus on participant-as-subject other-experimentation. Drawing from the non-experimental first-person traditions of autoethnography, participant observation, and phenomenology, we argue that participating as both observer and subject within one’s own social psychological experiment affords researchers at least three potential benefits: (1) access to “social qualia,” that is, the subjective experience of social phenomena; (2) improved mental models of social phenomena, potentially stimulating new research questions; and (3) an enhanced ability to be reflexive about the given experiment. To support our position, we provide first-person self-reflections from researchers who have self-experimented with transformed social interactions involving Milgram’s cyranoid method. We close by offering guidelines on how one might approach self-experimentation, and discuss a variety of first-person perspective ethnographic technologies that can be incorporated into the practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair, J. G. (1991). Social cognition, artifact, and the passing of the so-called crisis in social psychology. Canadian Psychology, 32(3), 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., & Geer, B. (1957). Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison. Human Organization, 16(3), 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

  • Blass, T. (2004). The man who shocked the world: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1915). The sensations of the alimentary canal. American Journal of Psychology, 26(1), 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, M. (2004). Dionysians and Apollonians [Peer commentary on “self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight”, by S. Roberts]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 263–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 3–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. (2014). Cleverbot. Retrieved from http://www.cleverbot.com.

  • Cornish, F., Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2007). A cultural psychological reflection on collaborative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/309/677.

  • Corti, K., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Revisiting Milgram’s cyranoid method: experimenting with hybrid human agents. Journal of Social Psychology, 155(1), 30–56.

  • Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1979). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 205–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1980). Wundt’s psychological experiment in the light of his philosophy of science. Psychological Researcher, 42, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1985). The origins of the psychological experiment as a social institution. American Psychologist, 40(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: a conceptual history, 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2007). Heterophenomenology reconsidered. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A. R., Caprani, N., Conaire, C. Ó., Kalnikaite, V., Gurrin, C., Smeaton, A. F., & O’Connor, N. E. (2011). Passively recognising human activities through lifelogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1948–1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrica, D., & Gaden, G. (2009). Knee-high boots and six-pack abs: auto ethnographic reflections on gender and technology in second life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(3), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elms, A. C. (1975). The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist, 30(10), 967–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. M. (1978). On the social significance of artifacts in experimenting. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(4), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. M. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920) and the origins of psychology as an experimental and social science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2009). Teachers’ and tutors’ social reflection around SenseCam images. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(12), 1024–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., & Sørensen, J. B. (2006). Experimenting with phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 119–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: a socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Studying the movement of thought. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology (pp. 69–88). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1998). The origins of the Journal of Phenomenological Psychology and some difficulties in introducing phenomenology into scientific psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 29(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, S. (2010). The presentation of avatars in second life: self and interaction in social virtual spaces. Symbolic Interaction, 33(4), 501–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurrin, C., Smeaton, A. F., Byrne, D., O’Hare, N., Jones, G. J. F., & O’Conner, N. (2008). Information retrieval technology (4993rd ed., pp. 537–542). Berlin: Springer. Lecture notes in computer science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikegami, E. (2011). Visualizing the networked self: agency, reflexivity, and the social life of avatars. Social Research, 78(4), 1155–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P., & Westcott, M. R. (1994). The changing character of phenomenological psychology. Canadian Psychology, 35(2), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1995). Recluse, interlocutor, interrogator: natural and social order in turn-of-the-century psychological research schools. Isis, 86(3), 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahlou, S. (2010). Digitization and transmission of human experience. Social Science Information, 49(3), 291–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahlou, S. (2011). How can we capture the subject’s perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50(3–4), 607–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahlou, S., Le Bellu, S., & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2015). Subjective evidence based ethnography: method and applications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9288-9. Advance online publication.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, J. T. (1987). Subarctic survival situation. Plymouth: Human Synergistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. R. (2013). The quantified self (QS) movement and some emerging opportunities for the educational technology field. Educational Technology, 53(6), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., & Mouchiroud, C. (2004). Why does self-experimentation lead to creative ideas? [Peer commentary on “Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight”, by S. Roberts]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 269–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marbach, E. (2007). No heterophenomenology without autophenomenology: variations on a theme of mine. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244, 522–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). In A. E. Murphy (Ed.), The philosophy of the present. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (2010a). Cyranoids. In T. Blass (Ed.), The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments (3rd ed., pp. 402–409). London: Pinter & Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (2010b). On maintaining social norms: A field experiment in the subway. In T. Blass (Ed.), The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments (3rd ed., pp. 34–41). London: Pinter & Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (2010c). Response to intrusion into waiting lines. In T. Blass (Ed.), The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments (3rd ed., pp. 42–55). London: Pinter & Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, T. (1970). Wundt and the conceptual foundations of psychology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 31(1), 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, A. (1981). Self-experimentation: a call for change. Behaviorism, 9(1), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafalovich, A. (2006). Making sociology relevant: the assignment and application of breaching experiments. Teaching Sociology, 34(2), 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2004). Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 227–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2012). The reception of my self-experimentation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1060–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, R. M., & Czerwinski, M. P. (1992). Mental models and the acquisition of expert knowledge. In R. R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2015). Undisciplining social science: Wittgenstein and the art of creating situated practices of social inquiry. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.

  • Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: on the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 656–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strenski, I. (1982). Malinowski: second positivism, second romanticism. Man, 17(4), 766–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Sheikh, A. A., & Gardner, R. C. (1964). Content of stereotypes and the inference of similarity between members of stereotyped groups. Acta Psychologica, 22, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1927). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory of practice (Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: what, why, how? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2–3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermersch, P. (1999). Introspection as practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2–3), 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2007). Avatar watching: participant observation in graphical online environments. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D. (2003). Knowing when to ask: introspection and the adaptive unconscious. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 131–140.

  • Winston, A. S., & Blais, D. J. (1996). What counts as an experiment? A transdisciplinary analysis of textbooks, 1930–1970. American Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., & Whitty, M. T. (2010). In search of the cartesian self: an examination of disembodiment within 21st-century communication. Theory & Psychology, 20(2), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1992). Foreword. In J. Sabini & M. Silver (Eds.), The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments (2nd ed., pp. ix–xi). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Corti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corti, K., Reddy, G., Choi, E. et al. The Researcher as Experimental Subject: Using Self-Experimentation to Access Experiences, Understand Social Phenomena, and Stimulate Reflexivity. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 288–308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9294-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9294-6

Keywords

Navigation