Abstract
This essay is an expanded set of comments on the social psychology papers written for the special issue on History and Social Psychology. It considers what social psychology, and particularly the theory of social representations, might offer historians working on similar problems, and what historical methods might offer social psychology. The social history of thinking has been a major theme in twentieth and twenty-first century historical writing, represented most recently by the genre of ‘cultural history’. Cultural history and the theory of social representations have common ancestors in early twentieth-century social science. Nevertheless, the two lines of research have developed in different ways and are better seen as complementary than similar. The theory of social representations usefully foregrounds issues, like social division and change over time, that cultural history relegates to the background. But for historians, the theory of social representations seems oddly fixated on comparing the thought styles associated with positivist science and ‘common sense’. Using historical analysis, this essay tries to dissect the core opposition ‘science : common sense’ and argues for a more flexible approach to comparing modes of thought.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anglo, S. (2005). Machiavelli—The first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bangerter, A. (1995). Rethinking the relation between science and common sense: a comment on the current state of SR theory. Papers on Social Representations/Textes sur les Représentations Sociales, 4(1), 1–18.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163–186.
Bellany, A. (2002). The politics of court scandal in early modern England: News culture and the overbury affair in context, 1603–1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berlin, I. (1979). Against the current: Essays in the history of ideas. London: The Hogarth Press.
Bloch, M. (1924). Les Rois Thaumaturges: étude sur le Caractère Surnaturel Attribué à la Puissance Royale, Particulièrement en France et en Angleterre. Strasbourg: Librairie Istra.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (Trans: Nice, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, P. (1969). Tacitism. In T. A. Dorey (Ed.), Tacitus (pp. 149–171). London: Routledge.
Burke, P. (1997a). Origins of cultural history. In Varieties of cultural history (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burke, P. (1997b). Strengths and weaknesses of the history of mentalities. In Varieties of cultural history (pp. 162–182). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Calaresu, M., de Vivo, F., & Rubiés, J.-P. (Eds.). (2010). Exploring cultural history: Essays in honour of Peter Burke. Farnham: Ashgate.
Chartier, R. (1988a). Intellectual history and the history of Mentalités: a dual re-evaluation. In Cultural history: Between practices and representations (pp. 19–52). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chartier, R. (1988b). Cultural history: Between practices and representations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.
Darnton, R. (1984). The great cat massacre and other episodes in French cultural history. New York: Basic Books.
Durkheim, É. (1907). Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.
Durkheim, É. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life. In: M. S. Cladis (Ed.), (Trans: Cosman, C.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Febvre, L. (1938). Quelques aspects d’une ethnographie en plein travail. Annales d’Histoire Économique et Sociale, 10(51), 248–255.
Febvre, L. (1982). The problem of unbelief in the sixteenth century: The religion of Rabelais. (Trans: Gottlieb, B.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York: Pantheon Books.
Frye, N. (1973). The anatomy of criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Ginzburg, C. (1976). High and low: the theme of forbidden knowledge in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Past and Present, 73, 28–41.
Grafton, A. (2007). What was history? the art of history in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harkness, D. (2007). The jewel house: Elizabethan London and the scientific revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hunt, L. (Ed.). (1989). The new cultural history. Berkeley & Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 431–448.
Jovchelovtich, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community, and culture. London: Routledge.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2012). Narrative, memory and social representations: a conversation between history and social psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9217-8.
Joyce, P. (1991). Visions of the people: Industrial England and the question of class, 1841–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lake, P. G. (1987). Calvinism and the english church 1570–1635. Past and Present, 114, 32–76.
Lake, P. (1989). Antipopery: the structure of a prejudice. In R. Chust & A. Hughes (Eds.), Conflict in early Stuart England (pp. 72–106). London: Longman.
Lake, P., & Questier, M. (Eds.). (2000). Conformity and orthodoxy in the english church, c.1560–1660. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow engineers and scientists through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1972). The savage mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1910). Les Fonctions Mentales dans les Sociétés Inférieures. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France.
Luckmann, T., & Berger, P. L. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marková, I. Method and explanation in history and in social representations. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9210-2.
Millstone, N. (2011). Plot’s Commonwealth: The circulation of manuscripts and the practice of politics in early Stuart England, c.1614–1640. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (Trans: Rabinovitch, S.) (pp. 3–69). Cambridge & Paris: Cambridge University Press & Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: from the ‘naive’ to the ‘amateur’ scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 98–125). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novick, P. (1988). That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenfeld, S. (2008). Before democracy: the production and uses of common sense. The Journal of Modern History, 80(1), 1–54.
Sammut, G., Tsirogianni, S., & Wagoner, B. (2012). Representations from the past: social relations and the devolution of social representations. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9212-0.
Schmaus, W. (1996). Lévy-Bruhl, Durkheim, and the positivist roots of the sociology of knowledge. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 32(4), 424–440.
Schöttler, P. (1995). Mentalities, ideologies, discourses: on the “third level” as a theme in historical research. In A. Lüdtke (Ed.), The history of everyday life: Reconstructing historical experiences and ways of life (Trans: Templer, W.) (pp. 72–115). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shagan, E. (2010). Beyond good and evil: thinking with moderates in early modern England. Journal of British Studies, 49(3), 488–513.
Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith, P. H. (2004). The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Soll, J. (2009). The information master: Jean-Baptiste Colbert’s secret state intelligence system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stedman-Jones, G. (1983). Languages of class: Studies in english working class history, 1832–1982. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E. P. (1966). The making of the english working class. New York: Vintage Books.
Tileagă, C. (2012). Communism and the meaning of social memory: towards a critical-interpretive approach. Integreative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9207-x.
White, H. (1975). metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
White, H. (1982). Tropics of discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millstone, N. ‘Historicising Common Sense’. Integr. psych. behav. 46, 529–543 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9222-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9222-y