Abstract
Family of origin is one of the less-studied areas to have been investigated during the rights-claiming process by non-heterosexuals. This paper discusses how family of origin plays a significant role in the claiming of rights (such as the authority to make health care or medical treatment, funeral arrangement and inheritance) by non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong. Because of the functional specificities of Chinese families and their perceptions of homosexuality, Chinese non-heterosexuals are eager to introduce their sexuality to their family of origin rather than participate in a more separated approach to coming out. This process constitutes a “coming home” approach to coming out as a member of a gender or sexual minority group. The negative effects of exclusion and ignorance not only affect the mental health of non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong but also shape and create social barriers to the claiming of rights. Findings from this study reveal that family of origin is a significant factor deterring non-heterosexuals from considering, planning or taking action to claim sexual citizenship rights.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This incident was about the arrest of a fellow police inspector named John MacLennan for indecency, and later the police found the suspect dead in his residence.
References
Andersen, A. J. (2011). Sexual citizenship in Norway. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(1), 120–134.
Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2000). The sexual citizen: Queer politics and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2002). Sexual citizenship: Marriage, the market and the military. In S. Seidman & D. Richardson (Eds.), The handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 443–457). London, England: SAGE.
Binnie, J. (1997). Invisible Europeans: Sexual citizenship in the new Europe. Environment and Planning A, 29, 237–248.
Chan, P. C. W. (2008). Stonewalling through schizophrenia: An anti-gay rights culture in Hong Kong. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 71–87.
Chou, W. S. (2000). Tongzhi: Politics of same-sex eroticism in Chinese societies. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
Chou, W. S. (2001). Homosexuality and the cultural politics of tongzhi in Chinese societies. In G. Sullivan & P. A. Jackson (Eds.), Gay and lesbian Asia: Cultural, identity, community (pp. 27–46). New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.
Community Business (2012) Hong Kong LGBT climate study 2011–2012. http://www.communitybusiness.org/LGBT/ClimateStudy.html.
Cossman, B. (2002). Sexing citizenship, privatizing sex. Citizenship Studies, 6(4), 483–506.
Esping-Anderson, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London, England: Sage.
Evans, D. (1993). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London, England: Routledge.
Geertz, C. (1973). Think description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of culture. Hutchinson: London, England.
Hong Kong SAR Government (2006). Hong Kong Affair Bureau. Survey on public attitudes towards homosexuals. http://www.cmab.gov.hk/doc/en/documents/policy_responsibilities/public_consultation/public_homosexuals_eng.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
Hong Kong SAR Government (2009). Proposal to amend domestic violence ordinance to cover same-sex victims [Press release]. http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200901/10/P200901090267.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2013.
Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2010). Qualitative research methods. London, England: SAGE.
Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. (1861). Offences against the Person Act 186. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1861/100/pdfs/ukpga_18610100_en.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2016.
Ho, P. S. Y. (1997). Politicizing identity: Decriminalization of homosexuality and the emergence of gay identity in Hong Kong. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex, UK.
Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups. (2008). Research report on Hong Kong people’s views on homosexuality. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups.
Hong Kong Government (1983). Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong. Report on laws governing homosexual conduct. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hong Kong Government (1988). Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong. Homosexual offenses: Should the law be changed? A consultation paper. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hong Kong Government (1996). Equal opportunities: A study of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. A consultation paper. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Filial piety in Japan and China: Borrowing, variation and significance. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2(1), 67–74.
Isin, E. F. (2007). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). London, England: Zed Books.
Kong, T. (2011). Chinese male homosexualities: Memba, tongzhi and golden boy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Legislative Council. (2008a). Background brief prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat for the meeting on 8 December 2008: Proposed amendment to the domestic violence ordinance, LC Paper No. CB(2)341/08-09(04). Panel on Welfare Services, Council Business Division 2, Legislative Council Secretariat.
Legislative Council. (2008b). Proposed amendments to the Domestic Violence Ordinance, LC Paper No. CB(2)341/08-09(03). Panel on Welfare Services, Labour and Welfare Bureau.
Legislative Council. (2009). Paper for the House Committee meeting on 4 December 2009: Report of the Bills Committee on Domestic Violence (Amendment) Bill 2009, LC Paper No. CB(2)418/09-10. Council Business Division 2, Legislative Council Secretariat.
Lin, A. (1992). Study of filial piety in Confucian thought. Taipei, Taiwan: Wen Jin.
Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development: Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Phelan, S. (2001). Sexual Strangers: Gay, lesbians, and dilemmas of citizenship. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Pierson, C. (2007). Beyond the welfare state: The new political economy of welfare. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate citizenship: Private decisions and public dialogues. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Plummer, K. (2005). Intimate citizenship in an unjust world. In M. Romero & E. Margolis (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social inequalities (pp. 75–99). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Powell, J., & Hendrick, J. (2009). The welfare states in post-industrial society: A global perspective. London, England: Springer.
Richardson, D. (1998). Sexuality and citizenship. Sociology, 32(1), 83–100.
Richardson, D. (2000a). Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorizing sexual rights. Critical Social Policy, 6(4), 105–135.
Richardson, D. (2000b). Claiming citizenship? Sexuality, citizenship and lesbian/feminist theory. Sexualities, 3(2), 271–288.
Richardson, D. (2004). Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexuality, 7(4), 391–411.
Richardson, D. (2005). Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode, 37(3), 515–553.
Richardson, D., & Monro, S. (2012). Sexuality, equality and diversity. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seidman, S. (2001). From identity to queer politics: Shifts in normative heterosexuality and the meaning of citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 5(3), 321–328.
Seidman, S. (2009). Critique of compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 6(1), 18–28.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
Stychin, C. F. (2001). Sexual citizenship in the European Union. Citizenship Studies, 5(3), 285–301.
Tang, D. T. S. (2009). Conditional space: Hong Kong lesbian desire and everyday life. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
The Equal Opportunities Commission (2013). Equal Opportunities Awareness Survey 2012. http://www.eoc.org.hk/eoc/upload/ResearchReport/2013191436554640807.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2013.
The University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme, & HO, C. (2012). Survey on Hong Kong public’s attitudes towards rights of people of different sexual orientations. http://www.eoc.org.hk/eoc/upload/ResearchReport/2013191436554640807.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2013.
The University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme, & HO, C. (2013). Survey on Hong Kong public’s attitudes towards rights of people of different sexual orientations. https://www.hkupop.hku.hk/english/report/LGBT_CydHo2013/content/resources/report.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
Weeks, J. (1998). The sexual citizen. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 35–52.
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wong, D. (2004). (Post) identity politics and anti-normalization: (Homo)sexual rights movement. In A. S. Ku & N. Pun (Eds.), Remaking citizenship in Hong Kong, community, nation and the global city (pp. 174–190). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wong, D. (2007). Rethinking the coming home alternative: Hybridization and coming out politics in Hong Kong’s anti-homophobia parades. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 8(4), 600–616.
Wong, C. Y., & Tang, C. S. K. (2004). Coming out experiences and psychological distress of Chinese homosexual men in Hong Kong. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(2), 149–157.
Funding
This study was funded by Hong Kong Baptist University. I hereby declare that the advice and information in the manuscript are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its release to the press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Hong Kong Baptist University.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, K.K. Family and Homosexuality in Chinese Culture: Rights Claims by Non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong. Sexuality & Culture 21, 845–859 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9425-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9425-y