Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Family and Homosexuality in Chinese Culture: Rights Claims by Non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Family of origin is one of the less-studied areas to have been investigated during the rights-claiming process by non-heterosexuals. This paper discusses how family of origin plays a significant role in the claiming of rights (such as the authority to make health care or medical treatment, funeral arrangement and inheritance) by non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong. Because of the functional specificities of Chinese families and their perceptions of homosexuality, Chinese non-heterosexuals are eager to introduce their sexuality to their family of origin rather than participate in a more separated approach to coming out. This process constitutes a “coming home” approach to coming out as a member of a gender or sexual minority group. The negative effects of exclusion and ignorance not only affect the mental health of non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong but also shape and create social barriers to the claiming of rights. Findings from this study reveal that family of origin is a significant factor deterring non-heterosexuals from considering, planning or taking action to claim sexual citizenship rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This incident was about the arrest of a fellow police inspector named John MacLennan for indecency, and later the police found the suspect dead in his residence.

References

  • Andersen, A. J. (2011). Sexual citizenship in Norway. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(1), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2000). The sexual citizen: Queer politics and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2002). Sexual citizenship: Marriage, the market and the military. In S. Seidman & D. Richardson (Eds.), The handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 443–457). London, England: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Binnie, J. (1997). Invisible Europeans: Sexual citizenship in the new Europe. Environment and Planning A, 29, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, P. C. W. (2008). Stonewalling through schizophrenia: An anti-gay rights culture in Hong Kong. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, W. S. (2000). Tongzhi: Politics of same-sex eroticism in Chinese societies. New York, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, W. S. (2001). Homosexuality and the cultural politics of tongzhi in Chinese societies. In G. Sullivan & P. A. Jackson (Eds.), Gay and lesbian Asia: Cultural, identity, community (pp. 27–46). New York, NY: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Business (2012) Hong Kong LGBT climate study 2011–2012. http://www.communitybusiness.org/LGBT/ClimateStudy.html.

  • Cossman, B. (2002). Sexing citizenship, privatizing sex. Citizenship Studies, 6(4), 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Anderson, G. (Ed.). (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (1993). Sexual citizenship: The material construction of sexualities. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Think description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of culture. Hutchinson: London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong SAR Government (2006). Hong Kong Affair Bureau. Survey on public attitudes towards homosexuals. http://www.cmab.gov.hk/doc/en/documents/policy_responsibilities/public_consultation/public_homosexuals_eng.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.

  • Hong Kong SAR Government (2009). Proposal to amend domestic violence ordinance to cover same-sex victims [Press release]. http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200901/10/P200901090267.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2013.

  • Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2010). Qualitative research methods. London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. (1861). Offences against the Person Act 186. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1861/100/pdfs/ukpga_18610100_en.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2016.

  • Ho, P. S. Y. (1997). Politicizing identity: Decriminalization of homosexuality and the emergence of gay identity in Hong Kong. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex, UK.

  • Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups. (2008). Research report on Hong Kong people’s views on homosexuality. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Government (1983). Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong. Report on laws governing homosexual conduct. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

  • Hong Kong Government (1988). Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong. Homosexual offenses: Should the law be changed? A consultation paper. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

  • Hong Kong Government (1996). Equal opportunities: A study of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. A consultation paper. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

  • Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Filial piety in Japan and China: Borrowing, variation and significance. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2(1), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F. (2007). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). London, England: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, T. (2011). Chinese male homosexualities: Memba, tongzhi and golden boy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Council. (2008a). Background brief prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat for the meeting on 8 December 2008: Proposed amendment to the domestic violence ordinance, LC Paper No. CB(2)341/08-09(04). Panel on Welfare Services, Council Business Division 2, Legislative Council Secretariat.

  • Legislative Council. (2008b). Proposed amendments to the Domestic Violence Ordinance, LC Paper No. CB(2)341/08-09(03). Panel on Welfare Services, Labour and Welfare Bureau.

  • Legislative Council. (2009). Paper for the House Committee meeting on 4 December 2009: Report of the Bills Committee on Domestic Violence (Amendment) Bill 2009, LC Paper No. CB(2)418/09-10. Council Business Division 2, Legislative Council Secretariat.

  • Lin, A. (1992). Study of filial piety in Confucian thought. Taipei, Taiwan: Wen Jin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development: Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. (2001). Sexual Strangers: Gay, lesbians, and dilemmas of citizenship. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, C. (2007). Beyond the welfare state: The new political economy of welfare. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate citizenship: Private decisions and public dialogues. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2005). Intimate citizenship in an unjust world. In M. Romero & E. Margolis (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social inequalities (pp. 75–99). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., & Hendrick, J. (2009). The welfare states in post-industrial society: A global perspective. London, England: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (1998). Sexuality and citizenship. Sociology, 32(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (2000a). Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorizing sexual rights. Critical Social Policy, 6(4), 105–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (2000b). Claiming citizenship? Sexuality, citizenship and lesbian/feminist theory. Sexualities, 3(2), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (2004). Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexuality, 7(4), 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. (2005). Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode, 37(3), 515–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D., & Monro, S. (2012). Sexuality, equality and diversity. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (2001). From identity to queer politics: Shifts in normative heterosexuality and the meaning of citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 5(3), 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (2009). Critique of compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 6(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stychin, C. F. (2001). Sexual citizenship in the European Union. Citizenship Studies, 5(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, D. T. S. (2009). Conditional space: Hong Kong lesbian desire and everyday life. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Equal Opportunities Commission (2013). Equal Opportunities Awareness Survey 2012. http://www.eoc.org.hk/eoc/upload/ResearchReport/2013191436554640807.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2013.

  • The University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme, & HO, C. (2012). Survey on Hong Kong public’s attitudes towards rights of people of different sexual orientations. http://www.eoc.org.hk/eoc/upload/ResearchReport/2013191436554640807.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2013.

  • The University of Hong Kong Public Opinion Programme, & HO, C. (2013). Survey on Hong Kong public’s attitudes towards rights of people of different sexual orientations. https://www.hkupop.hku.hk/english/report/LGBT_CydHo2013/content/resources/report.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.

  • Weeks, J. (1998). The sexual citizen. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. (2004). (Post) identity politics and anti-normalization: (Homo)sexual rights movement. In A. S. Ku & N. Pun (Eds.), Remaking citizenship in Hong Kong, community, nation and the global city (pp. 174–190). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. (2007). Rethinking the coming home alternative: Hybridization and coming out politics in Hong Kong’s anti-homophobia parades. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 8(4), 600–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. Y., & Tang, C. S. K. (2004). Coming out experiences and psychological distress of Chinese homosexual men in Hong Kong. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(2), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Hong Kong Baptist University. I hereby declare that the advice and information in the manuscript are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its release to the press.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ka Ki Chan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Hong Kong Baptist University.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, K.K. Family and Homosexuality in Chinese Culture: Rights Claims by Non-heterosexuals in Hong Kong. Sexuality & Culture 21, 845–859 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9425-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9425-y

Keywords

Navigation