Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rescue: Faith in the Unlimited Future

  • Symposium: The Religious and Secular in Medicine and Health
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rescue activities in US acute care settings reaffirm an unspoken belief in an unlimited future for patients, families, clniicians, and the public at large. Reaching for that future erases the patient’s experiences in the present, which can be detrimental to her welfare. A case study is used to illustrate how clinicians’ urgency to reify their faith in the patient’s unlimited future violated her real-world existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For discussions of the rationales for separating “us” and “them” in society, see Morone (1997), Scott (2008), and Baynton (2001); for the role of self-alienation, see Gilman (1988) and Soelle (1975).

  2. Private conversation with Jos Welie.

  3. See “Facing Death” (2010) for a statement that as technology expands, decision-making around dying will become even more difficult.

  4. It is interesting that both the WHO checklist and the TeamSTEPPS practices are formulaic interruptions. While they are designed to enhance communication and team-building, they are also explicit revisions to existing protocol rather than practices that exist outside established hospital routines. Two interventions that take up time in the present, dignity therapy (Chochinov et al. 2005) and Schwartz center rounds (Lown and Manning, 2010), require staff time of their own, apart from procedural work. They are not designed for patient safety, but rather to enrich the lives of patients and staff.

Further Reading

  • Bauman, Z. 1992. Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynton, D. C. 2001. Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History. In P. K. Longmore & L. Umansky (Eds.), The New Disability History: American Perspectives (pp. 33–57). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biss, E. 2014. On Immunity: An Inoculation. Minneapolis: Graywolf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer, D. 1996. Letters and Papers from Prison (Vol. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works, Volume 8). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. 2003. What Price Better Health? Hazards of the Research Imperative. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. 2009. Taming the Beloved Beast: How Medical Technology Costs are Destroying our Health Care System. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, H. S. 1999. Changing the Game in the Intensive Care Unit: Letting Nature Take Its Course. Critical Care Nurse 19(3), 25–34.

  • Chapple, H. S. 2010. No Place For Dying: Hospitals and the Ideology of Rescue. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapper, T. C., & Kong, M. 2012. TeamSTEPPS: The Patient Safety Tool That Needs to Be Implemented. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8, e367–e373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chochinov, H. M., Hack, T., Hassard, T., Kristjansen, L. J., McClement, S., Harlos, M. 2005. Dignity Therapy: A Novel Psychotherapeutic Intervention for Patients Near the End of LIfe. Journal of Clinical Oncology 23(24), 5520–5525.

  • Coulehan, J. 2011. Deep Hope: A Song without Words. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (32)3, 143–160.

  • Gilman, S. L. (1988). Depicting Disease: A Theory of Representating Illness. In Disease and Representation: Images of Illness from Madness to AIDS (pp.1–17). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Guyer, J. I. 2007. Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time. American Ethnologist, 34(3), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. 2005. …And a Time to Die: How American Hospitals Shape the End of Life. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown, B. A., Manning, C. F. 2010.The Schwartz Center Rounds: Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Enhancing Patient-Centered Communication, Teamwork, and Provider Support. Academic Medicine, 85(6), 1073–1081.

  • Mahajan, R. P. 2011. The WHO Surgical Checklist. Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 25, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morone, J. A. 1997. Enemies of the People: The Moral Dimention ot Public Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22(4), 993–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navasky, M., O’Connor, K. 2010. Facing Death. Frontline. PBS. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/facing-death/.

  • Rushton, C. H. 2009. Ethical Discernment and Action: The Art of Pause. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 20(1), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. 2008. Belief in a Just World: A Case Study in Public Health Ethics. Hastings Center Report, 38(1), 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. A. 2013. The Transplant Imaginary: Mechnical Hearts, Animal Parts, and Moral Thinking in Highly Experimental Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, S. L. 2008. Using CUS Words in the NICU. Neonatal Network, 27(6), 423–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soelle, D. 1975. Suffering. Philadelphia: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S. 1999. Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Stanton Chapple.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapple, H.S. Rescue: Faith in the Unlimited Future. Soc 52, 424–429 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9925-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9925-z

Keywords

Navigation