Skip to main content
Log in

Social Science and Morality: An Empirical Analysis

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Philip Gorski’s effort to bridge the gap between social science and morality is well intended, but misguided. His attempt to tear down the wall between facts and values does not succeed. To understand why, we must recognize that morality is an enterprise in which we humans participate; one based on the creation, modification, and implementation of moral rules. It is, in short, prescriptive rather than descriptive. Language that suggests otherwise is misleading. Normal, as opposed to “moral,” facts do apply to morality, but their role is best explicated in a tripartite theory of morality. This argues that moral rules are: 1) informal and paradigmatically learned, 2) created and modified in polarized social negotiations, and 3) largely enforced by emotional means. Once this is understood, the temptation of social scientists to import their own moral commitments into their scientific endeavors makes sense, as does the need to draw a line between these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Aristotle 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited by R. McKeon. New York: Random House.

  • Austin, J. L. 1961. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1948. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettleheim, B. 1977. The Uses of Enchantment. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). 1988. The Collected Works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, C. 1908. On War. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 2005. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1915. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1961. Moral Education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, M., & Fein, M. 1992. Analyzing Psychotherapy: A Social Role Interpretation. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, M. 1993. I.A.M.: A Common Sense Guide to Coping with Anger. Praeger: Westport, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, M. 1997. Hardball Without an Umpire: The Sociology of Morality. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, M. 1999. The Limits of Idealism: When Good Intentions Go Bad. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. M. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1953–1974. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. (Edited by J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press and Institute for Psychoanalysis.

  • Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (Eds.). 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P.S. 2013. “Beyond the Fact/Value Distinction: Ethical Naturalism and the Social Sciences.” Society, Vol. 50, N. 6.

  • Hare, R. M. 1964. The Language of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise on Human Nature. London.

  • Kant, I. 1788 1956. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. L.W. Beck. New Yoerk: Bobbs-Merrill Company.

  • Marx, K. 1967. Das Capital. In F. Engels (Ed.), Translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. New York: International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, A. 2013. “Weber’s Social Space of Reasons.” Society, Vol. 50, N. 6.

  • Mill, J. S. 1857. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1960. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1886 1966. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Trans Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House.

  • Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. 1970. Behind Ghetto Walls: Black Families in a Federal Slum. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.J. 1968. 1762 The Social Contract (Translated by Maurice Cranston) New York: Penguin Books.

  • Rousseau, J. J. 1992. The Discourse on the Origins of Inequality. In D. Roger (Ed.), Masters and Christopher Kelly. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sable, A. 2013. “Whose Flourishing? Which Aristotelianism?” Society, Vol. 50, N. 6.

  • Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan & T. Cadell.

  • Smith, C. 2013. “Comparing Ethical Naturalism and ‘Public Sociology’” Society, Vol. 50, N. 6.

  • Sumner, W. G. 1960. Folkways. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 2004. Social Movements: 1768–2004. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. 1966. Democracy in America. Trans. by George Lawrence. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Turner, S. 2013. “Sociology Rediscovering Ethics” Society, Vol. 50, N. 6.

  • de Waal, F. 1982. Chimpanzee Politics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. 1996. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: The MacMillan Company.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melvyn L. Fein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fein, M.L. Social Science and Morality: An Empirical Analysis. Soc 51, 452–463 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9811-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9811-0

Keywords

Navigation