Society

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 439–446

Politicized Science

Commentary

DOI: 10.1007/s12115-013-9686-5

Cite this article as:
Redding, R.E. Soc (2013) 50: 439. doi:10.1007/s12115-013-9686-5

Abstract

Publication of the study, How Different are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study (Regnerus, 2012), caused a firestorm in the scientific community. Unlike previous studies, it found differences between the children raised by parents who had experienced a same-sex relationship as compared to those raised by heterosexual parents. Most would acknowledge that policy-relevant social science is seldom value free and frequently gets politicized, but the Regnerus controversy illustrates that it is value dependent, with scientist deeply embedded in its politicization. The kind if science that gets conducted, how findings are interpreted and received, and the degree of critical scrutiny such studies receive is dependent upon scientists’ sociopolitical views. Making every effort to apply the same standards when scrutinizing studies that provide politically palatable results as those that do not, and promoting rather than discouraging ideological diversity among researchers and their funders, are the best way to ensure value-pluralism and the integrity of science in the oft-politicized field of social science.

Keywords

Gay parentingScientific groupthinkBiasPolitics and SciencePoliticallyCorrect science

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chapman University, One University DriveOrangeUSA