Skip to main content
Log in

Mises on Monetary Reform: the Private Alternative

  • Published:
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

Abstract

This paper discusses Ludwig von Mises's proposals for monetary reform. We will largely focus on technical aspects—the concrete practical steps he recommended—without detailing how these relate to his general conceptions of money and of a sound monetary order. We will highlight two characteristic features of Mises's proposals. One, he stressed the role of the competitive market process and of private initiative in establishing a monetary order based on gold, effective gold coin circulation, and 100% reserve banking. Two, he presented an original scheme for privatizing the control of the money supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mises presents his monetary theory in Theory of Money and Credit (1980) and in Human Action (1949), especially chapters 17 and 20. He discusses the principles of a sound monetary order (and thus the goals to be pursued by monetary reform) in his Theory of Money and Credit, chap. 20 (first published in 1924) and chap. 21 (first published in 1953). See Pallas (2005) and Hülsmann (2007) for a general discussion of Mises’s contributions to monetary economics. For an analysis of the evolution of his monetary thought see Gertchev (2004).

  2. He also discussed monetary reform in papers written during the 1930s and World War II, mainly restating ideas he had already presented in 1919 and 1923.

  3. It was Mises's (1919a, pp. 156ff.) position that Austria should be granted a special subsidy during the first years of the unification because Austrians had made greater contributions to the war effort, and had suffered more from defeat. Also, the financial agreement between the two states had to allow Austrian entrepreneurs to redeem discounted war bonds at the central bank. This was absolutely essential because they had invested much more of their capital in war bonds than had the German entrepreneurs. Mises insisted on these two points, mentioning each of them twice in his 25-page report.

  4. This scheme corresponds more or less exactly to the way the euro has been introduced based on prevailing market exchange rates. In a first step (1999 to 2002), the different national currencies were kept in circulation, but they had changed their economic natures. They were no longer independent monies, but legal substitutes for the new money that had not yet any visible embodiment (however, electronic counterparts—the so-called central-bank “liquidities” already existed as from 1999). With Mises we could say that in those three years the mark, the franc, the schilling, etc., were but names for a part of the euro. In a second step, then, the old national paper notes were replaced by euro notes and coins.

  5. Without knowing it, Mises had spelled out here an idea that, many years before him, Carl Menger had stated in a private note, saying that ideas must run their course. F.A. Hayek discovered this note at the beginning of the 1930s, when he worked on a new edition of Menger's works. Mises (1969, pp. 3–6) later referred to this note in his The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics.

  6. The deficiences he alludes to concern the absence of legal limitations on checking accounts and other money substitutes.

  7. The reform enacted by the German government in 1923 differed from the Mises plan in respect to the second point. It stopped the printing press, but then introduced a new paper money without any backing in gold. This worked because the government had successfully created new confidence among the population that the decline of the currency had reached its limit. It established a new note-issuing Rentenbank endowed with a claim to 3,200 million marks which were said to be “backed up” by all commercial assets in Germany. On the day when this new bank started issuing its Rentenmarks, the printing of the old marks was halted, thus breaking the vicious circle of inflation.

  8. Similarly, he wrote in private correspondence: “There is only one effective method of avoiding inflation: All government expenditure must be covered by taxes and by borrowing from the public, not by borrowing from the commercial banks” (1951).

  9. He had little doubt that these warnings would go unheeded (1952).

  10. Mises repeated this warning about the Fed:

    It is essential for the reform suggested that the Federal Reserve System should be kept out of its way. Whatever one may think about the merits or demerits of the Federal Reserve legislation of 1913, the fact remains that the system has been abused by the most reckless inflationary policy. No institution and no man connected in any way with the blunders and sins of the past decades must be permitted to influence future monetary conditions. (1980, p. 493)

References

  • Gertchev, Nikolay. 2004. “Dehomogenizing Mises's Monetary Theory.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 18(3).

  • Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 2007. Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1919a. “Der Wiedereintritt Deutsch-Österreichs in das Deutsche Reich und die Währungsfrage.” In Wirtschaftliche Verhältnisse Deutsch-Österreichs. Ed. Michael Hainisch. Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 158. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1919b. “Über die im Hinblick auf das Fortschreiten der Geldentwertung zu ergreifenden Massnahmen” [On the measures to be taken on behalf of the decreasing value of money]. Memorandum. Mises Archive 109.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1923a. “Die geldtheoretische Seite des Stabilisierungsproblems.” Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 164(2) Munich: Duncker & Humblot. Mises Archive 109. Trans. “Stabilization of the Monetary Unit—From the Viewpoint of Theory.” In On the Manipulation of Money and Credit. Trans. Percy L. Greaves. New York: Free Market Books, 1978. Reprinted in The Causes of the Economic Crises. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2006.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1923b. Duncker & Humblot (Verein's publisher) letter to Mises. February 26; Mises Archive 78.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1949. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1951. Mises letter to Howard Pew. November 6; Grove City Archive: Pew files.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1952. Mises letter to Rougier. January 3; Grove City Archive: Rougier files.

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1969. The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1980. Theory of Money and Credit. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, Carsten. 2005. Ludwig von Mises als Pionier der modernen Geld und Konjunkturtheorie. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucken, Rudolph. 1964. Deutsche Geld-und Kreditpolitik, 1914–1963. 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Guido Hülsmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hülsmann, J.G. Mises on Monetary Reform: the Private Alternative. Quart J Austrian Econ 11, 208–218 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-008-9044-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-008-9044-4

Keywords

Navigation