Date: 15 Dec 2009
“So My Family Can Survive:” Prisoner Re-Entry and the Risk and Resilience of Black Families
- Cassandra Chaney
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Given the thousands of African American men that are released from prison each year, a growing number of national, state and local programs have been established to facilitate easier transitions for these men into the workforce. However, very little is known about the relational risk and resilience factors of married and cohabiting African American men and their partners after their release from prison. More specifically, there is a lack of data that addresses the qualitative responses of married and cohabiting African Americans regarding the following seven dimensions: (a) factors associated with initial attraction; (b) feelings when they realized they were in a “coupled” relationship; (c) post-cohabitation adjustments; (d) the meaning of commitment; (e) perceptions regarding how being in a relationship changed their lives; (f) perceptions regarding how the relationship expanded the couple’s view of commitment; as well as (g) couple perceptions regarding the future of their relationship. To address this paucity, this paper will feature narratives provided by two previously incarcerated African American men (one married; one cohabiting) and their partners. Qualitative analyses of the data resulted in risk and resilience themes related to each of the aforementioned dimensions. Themes were related to the start of the relationship, perceptions regarding in a “coupled” relationship, psychological and behavioral changes after cohabitation, the definition and demonstration of commitment, how being in a relationship positively changed the lives of these couples, broadened how they think about commitment, as well as confidence regarding the future of their relationship. Supporting qualitative data are presented in connection with each theme. Using qualitative coding and analysis, implications and recommendations regarding how national, state, and local programs can identify the risks and further develop the strengths of these men are also provided.
Administration for Children and Families—African–American Healthy Marriage Initiative. (2009). Retrieved March 2, 2009 from website: http://www.aahmi.net.
Administration for Children and Families—Fiscal Year. (2009). Logic Model. Retrieved Saturday, April 25, 2009 from website:http://www.acf.hhs.gov/healthymarriage/pdf/2009_logicmodel.pdf.
Belenko, S. (2006). Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse-related service needs. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 94–113.CrossRef
Bogenschneider, K. (2006). Family policy matters: How policymaking affects families and what professionals can do (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Brown, P. M. (1995). The death of intimacy: Barriers to meaningful interpersonal relationships. New York: Haworth.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (Summary Findings). (2009). Retrieved on Thursday, April 15, 2009 from: http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/prisons.htm.
Chaney, C. (2006). Emotional closeness and commitment among African–American couples: Implications for promoting relationship stability. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Cole, D. (2000). Why so severe? Tough on crime policies burden disempowered minority. L.P. Fulton County Daily Report.
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Davis, K. E. (1985). Near and dear: friendship and love compared. Psychology Today, 19, 22–30.
Dorfman, L., & Schiraldi, V. (2001). Off balance: youth, race, and crime in the news. Justice Policy Institute.
Feldman, L., Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2001). Too little too late: President Clinton’s prison legacy. Justice Policy Institute.
Frost, N. A. (2008). Alternative measures of punitiveness and their (substantial) consequences. Punishment & Society, 10(3), 277–300.CrossRef
Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15(3), 203–207.CrossRef
Garmezy, N. (1990). A closing note: Reflections on the future. In J. Rolf, A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 527–534). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K. E., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes and even higher expectations: the retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301–1312.CrossRef
Hairston, C. F. (2002). Prisoners and families: Parenting issues during incarceration. Retrieved on Saturday, April 11, 2009 from: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410628_PrisonersandFamilies.pdf.
Hairston, C. F., & Oliver, W. (2006). Domestic violence and prisoner reentry: Experiences of African American men and women. Retrieved on Saturday, April 11, 2009 from:http://www.vera.org/publication_pdf/367_660.pdf.
Holmberg, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Veroff, J. (2004). Thrice told tales: Married couples tell their stories. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Hopkins, K. (2007). My kids and wife have been my life. Doctoral Dissertation: Louisiana State University.
Knepper, P. (2003). Explaining criminal conduct: Theories and systems in criminology. Durham: Carolina Academic.
Luthar, S. S., & Zigler, E. (1991). Vulnerability and competence: A review of research on resilience in childhood. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(1), 6–22.CrossRef
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.CrossRef
Masten, A., Best, K., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.CrossRef
Mattis, J. S. (2000). African american women’s definitions of spirituality and religiosity. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(1), 101–122.CrossRef
Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1976). Love and addiction. New York: New American Library.
Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375.CrossRef
Pettus, C. A., & Severson, M. (2006). Paving the way for effective reentry practice. The Prison Journal, 86(2), 206–229.CrossRef
Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2002). Social capital among women offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 167–187.CrossRef
Reese, R. (2001). Criminal justice and social injustice: African American men in the U.S. Journal of Ethics and Justice, 1–8. September.
Reese, R. (2004). Noble principles: Ignoble practices: Race and the U.S. criminal justice system. Perspectives, 1–8.
Rempel, J., & Holmes, J. (1986). How do I love thee? Psychology Today, 30–31. February.
Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 181–214). New York: Cambridge.
Scott, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55(4), 499–509.CrossRef
Simmons, T., & O’Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
Simpson, J. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 683–692.CrossRef
Smock, P. J., & Gupta, S. (2002). Cohabitation in contemporary North America. In A. Booth & A. J. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 53–84). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Smock, P. J., & Manning, W. D. (2004). Living together unmarried in the United States: demographic perspectives and implications for family policy. Law and Policy, 26(1), 87–117.CrossRef
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Taylor, R., Jackson, J. S., & Chatters, L. (1997). Family life in Black America. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(12), 452–460.CrossRef
Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington: The Urban Institute.
Travis, J., Cincotta McBride, E., & Solomon, A. L. (2005). Urban Institute—Justice Policy Center. Retrieved on April 14, 2009 from: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310882_families_left_behind.pdf. June.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Retrieved on March 27, 2009 from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2003.html.
Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Williams, O. J. (1999). African American men who batter: Treatment considerations and community response. In R. Staples (Ed.), The Black family: Essays and studies (pp. 265–279). Belmont: Wadsworth.
- “So My Family Can Survive:” Prisoner Re-Entry and the Risk and Resilience of Black Families
Journal of African American Studies
Volume 15, Issue 1 , pp 95-114
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Prisoner re-entry
- Cassandra Chaney (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Human Ecology, Division of Family, Child and Consumer Sciences, Louisiana State University, 336 Human Ecology Building, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803-4300, USA