Abstract
For publishers and librarians to work well together it will help for publishers have a good idea of the circumstances and challenges currently facing libraries. This includes but is not limited to budget; libraries also struggle with a complex technology environment, quickly changing licensing, pricing and content options, and incomplete adoption of standards by publishers and software vendors. This paper is a short introduction to these issues and includes a brief overview of what publishers can do to help librarians, and what librarians can do to help publishers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson EK. Electronic resource management systems and related products. Libr Technol Rep. 2014;50(3):30–42.
Breeding M. Library systems report 2015: operationalizing innovation. Am Libr. 2015;45:29
Stevenson Liz, Hutchens Chad. Kbart-how it will benefit libraries and users. Against Grain. 2014;23(1):1.
Dixon P. Ethical issues implicit in library authentication and access management: risks and best practices. J Libr Adm. 2008;47(3/4):141–62.
Machovec G. Consortial e-resource licensing: current trends and issues. J Libr Adm. 2015;55(1):69–78.
National Information Standards Organization. Seru: shared electronic resource understanding, vol. 5. Baltimore: National Information Standards Organization; 2012.
Dygert C, Van Rennes R. Building your licensing and negotiation skills toolkit. Ser Libr. 2015;68(1–4):17–25.
Lokhande AS. Licensing of electronic periodicals in academic libraries. Int J Inf Dissem Technol. 2014;4(4):275–7.
Smith J, Hartnett E. The licensing lifecycle: from negotiation to compliance. Ser Libr. 2015;68(1–4):205–14.
LOCKSS. Lockss: lots of copies keep stuff safe. http://www.lockss.org/.
Portico. Portico. http://www.portico.org/digital-preservation/.
Bergstrom TC. Librarians and the terrible fix: economics of the big deal. Serials. 2010;23(2):77–82.
Blecic DD, Wiberley SE Jr, Fiscella JB, Bahnmaier-Blaszczak S, Lowery R. Deal or no deal? Evaluating big deals and their journals. Coll Res Libr. 2013;74(2):178–94.
Cuddy C, Wrynn P. Licensing content for Pdas. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2007;4(1/2):175–84.
Fought RL, Gahn P, Mills Y. Promoting the library through the collection development policy: a case study. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2014;11(4):169–78.
Moore KB. Are we there yet? Moving to an e-only collection development policy for books. Ser Libr. 2015;68(1–4):127–36.
Hendrix D, Hasman L. A survey of collection development for United States Medical Licensing Examination (Usmle) and National Board Dental Examination (Nbde) preparation material. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008;96(3):207–16.
Arzola R, Havelka S. Mobile apps in collection development. Charlest Advis. 2015;16(3):43–5.
COUNTER. Counting online usage of networked electronic resources. http://www.projectcounter.org/index.html.
Foster AK, McEvoy K. Analyze this: usage and your collection—usage statistics at the point of need. Against Grain. 2013;25(6):72–4.
National Information Standards Organization (NISO). Standardized usage statistics harvesting initiative (Sushi) protocol, vol. 42. Baltimore: National Information Standards Organization (NISO); 2014.
Pesch O. Simplifying usage statistics: what’s next for Sushi. Ser Libr. 2013;65(1):25–31.
Michalek A, Buschman M. Analyze this: altmetrics and your collection—statistics and collection development. Against Grain. 2014;26(2):80–1.
Wilson V. Research methods: altmetrics. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2013;8(1):126–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, E. Print to Electronic: The Library Perspective. Pub Res Q 32, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9440-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9440-5