Skip to main content
Log in

Researchers’ Mobility, Productivity and Impact: Case of Top Producing Authors in Seven Disciplines

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether scientific mobility, either between countries or between affiliations has an effect on researchers’ productivity and impact. In order to investigate this issue, we examined the relationships between the number of institutional affiliations and countries of the top 100 authors in seven disciplines. The selected authors’ profiles contained the number of affiliations and countries each author is assigned. We studied the number of affiliations and countries and compared them to three bibliometric indicators: the number of publications in international, peer-reviewed journals, h-index and Field Weighted Citations Impact. Our findings show that although there are differences in the relationship between mobility, productivity and impact between disciplines, mobility between at least two affiliations has an overall positive effect on both output and impact while mobility between countries does not. Therefore, in most disciplines positive impact and productivity effects are tracked in affiliation mobility within a single country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackers L. Moving people and knowledge: scientific mobility in the European Union1. Int Migr. 2005;43(5):99–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aksnes DW, Rørstad K, Piro FN, Sivertsen G. Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Res Eval. 2013;22(4):215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baruffaldi SH, Landoni P. Return mobility and scientific productivity of researchers working abroad: the role of home country linkages. Res Policy. 2012;4(9):1655–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colledge L, Verlinde R (2014). Scival metrics guidebook.Elsevier.com. 2014. Retrieved April 8, 2015, from http://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/184749/scival-metrics-guidebook-v1_01-february2014.pdf.

  5. David PA, Foray D. Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. Policy Future Educ. 2003;1(1):20–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez-Zubieta A, Geuna A, Lawson C (2013). Researchers’ mobility and its impact on scientific productivity. Social Sciences Research network.com. 2013. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2244760.

  7. Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res Policy. 1991;20(5):499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaillard AM, Gaillard J. The international circulation of scientists and technologists. Sci Commun. 1998;20(1):106–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson J, McKenzie D. Scientific mobility and knowledge networks in high emigration countries: evidence from the Pacific. Res Policy. 2014;43(9):1486–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iredale R. The migration of professionals: theories and typologies. Int Migr. 2001;39(5):7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson JM, Regets MC (1998). International mobility of scientists and engineers to the united states–brain drain or brain circulation?ERIC.gov. 1998. Retrieved May 22, 2015, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED422166.

  12. Libaers DP. Role and contribution of foreign-born scientists and engineers to the public US nanoscience and technology research enterprise. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2007;54(3):423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundvall BÅ, Johnson B, Andersen ES, Dalum B. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Res Policy. 2002;31(2):213–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr. 2010;4:265–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moed HF, Halevi G. A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration. Scientometrics. 2014;101(3):1987–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saxenian A. From brain drain to brain circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2005;40(2):35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stephan PE, Levin SG. Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2001;20(1):59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Van Leeuwen ThN, Visser MS. Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator. J Informetr. 2013;7:272–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gali Halevi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halevi, G., Moed, H.F. & Bar-Ilan, J. Researchers’ Mobility, Productivity and Impact: Case of Top Producing Authors in Seven Disciplines. Pub Res Q 32, 22–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9437-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9437-0

Keywords

Navigation