Abstract
This paper is a commentary on Christian Smith’s “The Conceptual Incoherence of ‘Culture’ in American Cultural Sociology.” This paper accepts Smith’s finding of conceptual incoherence at the disciplinary level and argues that it is a symptom of empiricism in American sociology. The paper suggests we employ conceptual analysis as practiced by analytical philosophy and proceeds to show how the use of that methodology can resolve the problem regarding the meaning of culture. In the end, the paper defends a conception of culture along the lines of Archer’s (1996) intelligibilia, interpreted as action and its products bearing social reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M. (1996). Culture and agency: the place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2013). Social morphogenesis and the prospects of morphogenetic society. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bennett, T., & Flow, J. (Eds.). (2008). Sage handbook of cultural analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 14, 278–280.
Feinberg, J. (1978). Psychological egoism. In J. Feinberg (Ed.), Reason and responsibility: readings in some basic problems of philosophy (pp. 501–512). New York: Wadsworth.
Garland, D. (2012). Peculiar institution: America’s death penalty in an age of abolition. Cambridge: Belknap.
Jerolmack, C., & Kahn, S. (2014). Talk is cheap: ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 178–209.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals and manners: the culture of the french and American upper middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamont, M. (2000). Meaning-making in cultural sociology: broadening our agena. Contemporary Sociology, 29(4), 602–607.
Lamont, M., & Swidler, A. (2014). Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology, 37, 153–171.
Porpora, D. (1989). Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 195–212.
Porpora, D. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: the critical realist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, C. (2014). To flourish or destruct: a personalist theory of human goods, motivations, failure, and evil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, C. (2015). The conceptual incoherence of “culture” in American cultural sociology. American Sociologist.
Steiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton.
Steinmetz, G. (2005). The politics of method in the human sciences: positivism and its epistemological others. Durham: Duke University Press.
Swidler, A. (2001). What anchors cultural practices. In T. R. Shatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 74–92). New York: Routledge.
Turner, S. (2013). American sociology: from pre-disciplinary to post-normal. New York: Palgrave.
Turner, S. (2015). Understanding the tacit. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porpora, D.V. The Meaning of Culture and the Culture of Empiricism in American Sociology. Am Soc 47, 430–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-016-9316-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-016-9316-y