Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of Unity and Disunity in Sociology

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay I will present some ideas on the themes of unity and disunity in our field. It will be a sociological analysis of our own house, a kind of sociology of knowledge about sociology. I will not only consider internal features of the discipline but also will move out of doors and consider our institutional embeddedness in the academy, as well as in larger societal, political, and cultural environments. It is rare that sociologists use their own tools to analyze themselves, but it important and profitable to do so. I use the terms “unity” and “disunity” in the title. Neither term is very clear in its meaning. My subject is sufficiently complex, however, that a single term with a single referent will not do. By “unity” I mean commitment to a common culture and mission, a sense of solidarity, lack of conflict, and a generally positive attitude toward others in one’s social category (in this case, other sociologists). By “disunity” I mean the opposite of each of the factors making for unity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. J. (1998). Presidential address: the rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. J. (2005). The questionable logic of “Mistakes” in “The Dynamics of Knowledge Growth in the Social Sciences. Social Research, 72(1), 237–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. (1994). “Sociology as Science, Humanism, and Art,” La Revue Tocqueville, Vol. XV, pp. 1–15.

  • Wilson, L. (1942). The academic man: A study in the sociology of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil J. Smelser.

Additional information

Adapted from a lecture in honor Piotr Sztompka on the occasion of his retirement, delivered at Jagiellonian University, Krakow, May, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smelser, N.J. Sources of Unity and Disunity in Sociology. Am Soc 46, 303–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9260-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9260-2

Keywords

Navigation