Another View of Conventions
- Charles Tilly
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Conventions consist of conventionally accepted reasons for dereliction, deviation, distinction, or good fortune. Their use facilitates coordination of interpersonal effort through appeal to shared understandings that emerge from the push and pull of social interaction, but then constrain further rounds of that interaction. The use of conventions differs from three other well defined and widely used forms of reason giving: codes, technical accounts, and stories. All four do relational work, but conventions operate most easily and effectively when participants in social relations are simply confirming the character of those relations rather than establishing them anew, contesting them, terminating them, or transforming them. In those cases, participants are more likely to employ codes, technical accounts, or stories.
- Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
- Drew, P. (2003). Precision and exaggeration in interaction. American Sociological Review, 68, 917–938. CrossRef
- Hardin, R. (2002). Street-level epistemology and democratic participation. Working Paper 2002/178, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid.
- Tilly, C. (2006). Why? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- White, H. (2001). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Zelizer, V. A. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Another View of Conventions
The American Sociologist
Volume 41, Issue 4 , pp 390-399
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Social Relations
- Charles Tilly (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA