Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interobserver Variation Among Pathologists in Evaluating Perineural Invasion for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Head and Neck Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this study are as follows: (1) to assess variations among pathologists in evaluating perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), (2) to survey PNI criteria used by pathologists and how they came to adopt those criteria. An electronic survey was sent to 363 oral and/or surgical pathologists. Eligibility criteria included pathology board certification. The survey participants were asked to rate whether PNI was present, absent, or uncertain for 15 provided photomicrographs, which depicted various types of tumor-nerve relationships without excessive desmoplasia or lymphocytic host response. The survey obtained information regarding demographics, whether PNI criteria were taught during residency, criteria used by participants to evaluate PNI, how the participants developed their criteria, and agreement with six proposed PNI definitions. 88 pathologists completed the survey. The participants included 47 males and 41 females, with average age = 49 years and average practice experience = 17 years. Practice settings included dental school (40 %), medical school (36 %), private pathology lab (13 %), and other (11 %). Agreement between participants in rating PNI status for the provided images was fair (κ = .38, 95 % CI .37–.39). 56 % of respondents indicated that they were taught PNI criteria during residency training. The basis for criteria currently used by participants included residency training (n = 42), published literature (n = 29), and own experience/views (n = 32). Agreement regarding six proposed PNI definitions was slight (κ = .10, 95 % CI .08–.11). In conclusion, interobserver agreement in assessing PNI status was fair. Our results suggest that more widely accepted, objective, and reproducible criteria are needed for evaluating PNI in OSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Comprehensive Care Network: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): head and neck cancers, version 1. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#head-and-neck (2015). Accessed 27 Aug 2015.

  2. Johnston M, Yu E, Kim J. Perineural invasion and spread in head and neck cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12:359–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tai SK, Li WY, Chu PY, Chang SY, Tsai TL, Wang YF, et al. Risks and clinical implications of perineural invasion in T1-2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:994–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hinerman RW, Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, Werning JW, Villaret DB. Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: 35-year experience. Head Neck. 2004;26:984–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, Lee B, Rolnitzky L, Hille JJ, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, D’Amico F, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Batsakis JG. Nerves and neurotropic carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94:426–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akert K, Sandri C, Weibel ER, Peper K, Moor H. The fine structure of the perineural endothelium. Cell Tissue Res. 1976;165:281–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn M, Morgan MB, Beer TW. Perineural invasion: identification, significance, and a standardized definition. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:214–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller ME, Palla B, Chen Q, Elashoff DA, Abemayor E, St John MA, et al. A novel classification system for perineural invasion in noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: histologic subcategories and patient outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seefeld PH, Bargen JA. The spread of carcinoma of the rectum: invasion of lymphatics, veins and nerves. Ann Surg. 1943;118:76–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ojiri H. Perineural spread in head and neck malignancies. Radiat Med. 2006;24:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendenhall WM, Ferlito A, Takes RP, Bradford CR, Corry J, Fagan JJ, et al. Cutaneous head and neck basal and squamous cell carcinomas with perineural invasion. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:918–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gil Z, Carlson DL, Gupta A, Lee N, Hoppe B, Shah JP, et al. Patterns and incidence of neural invasion in patients with cancers of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Binmadi NO, Basile JR. Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a discussion of significance and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:1005–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA. Perineural and vascular invasion in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: increased incidence on re-review of slides and by using immunohistochemical enhancement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:354–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berlingeri-Ramos AC, Detweiler CJ, Wagner RF Jr, Kelly BC. Dual S-100-AE1/3 immunohistochemistry to detect perineural invasion in nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Skin Cancer. 2015;2015:620235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Frydenlund N, Leone DA, Mitchell B, Abbas O, Dhingra J, Mahalingam M. Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: role of immunohistochemistry, anatomical site, and the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor TrkA. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:1209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piña AR, Martinez MM, de Almeida OP. Glut-1, best immunohistochemical marker for perineurial cells. Head Neck Pathol. 2015;9:104–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tatemoto Y, Saka M, Tanimura T, Mori M. Immunohistochemical observations on binding of monoclonal antibody to epithelial membrane antigen in epithelial tumors of the oral cavity and skin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;64:721–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ayala FR, Rocha RM, Carvalho KC, Carvalho AL, da Cunha IW, Lourenco SV, et al. GLUT1 and GLUT3 as potential prognostic markers for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Molecules. 2010;15:2374–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Vicente JC, Fernandez-Valle A, Vivanco-Allende B, Santamarta TR, Lequerica-Fernandez P, Hernandez-Vallejo G, et al. The prognostic role of claudins -1 and -4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:2949–59.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ueno H, Shirouzu K, Eishi Y, Yamada K, Kusumi T, Kushima R, et al. Characterization of perineural invasion as a component of colorectal cancer staging. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scanlon CS, Banerjee R, Inglehart RC, Liu M, Russo N, Hariharan A, et al. Galanin modulates the neural niche to favour perineural invasion in head and neck cancer. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolokythas A, Cox DP, Dekker N, Schmidt BL. Nerve growth factor and tyrosine kinase A receptor in oral squamous cell carcinoma: is there an association with perineural invasion? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research (SCTR) Institute with an academic home at the Medical University of South Carolina, through NIH Grant Numbers UL1 RR029882 and UL1 TR000062; and the Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University—Baylor College of Dentistry. The authors wish to thank all colleagues who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela C. Chi.

Appendix: Survey Questions

Appendix: Survey Questions

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chi, A.C., Katabi, N., Chen, HS. et al. Interobserver Variation Among Pathologists in Evaluating Perineural Invasion for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Head and Neck Pathol 10, 451–464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0722-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0722-9

Keywords

Navigation