Self-Reported Intentions to Offend: All Talk and No Action?
- M. Lyn ExumAffiliated withDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Email author
- , Michael G. TurnerAffiliated withDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
- , Jennifer L. HartmanAffiliated withDepartment of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To study criminal decision making, researchers commonly present hypothetical offending scenarios to participants and record their self-reported intentions to offend (SRIO). These SRIO scores are treated as an indicator of participants’ predisposition to commit the act described in the scenario. Drawing from the field of clinical measurement, the current study examines the diagnostic accuracy of SRIO scores by comparing participants’ intentions to acquire illegal music files from a designated distributor to their actual attempts to acquire such files. Approximately 7% of participants who read about a (bogus) music piracy opportunity reported strong—and at times definitive—intentions to seek out the illegal files. However, in actuality, no one in the study engaged in this behavior. Clinimetric indicators suggest that SRIO scores are better at predicting abstention from crime than actual criminal participation.
KeywordsHypothetical scenarios Intentions to offend Predictive validity
- Self-Reported Intentions to Offend: All Talk and No Action?
American Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume 37, Issue 4 , pp 523-543
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Hypothetical scenarios
- Intentions to offend
- Predictive validity